It is widely known that the high-tech, petrochemical, electroplating and dyeing and finishing industries use large amounts of energy and water while creating heavy pollution.
When planning where to locate these industries’ factories, it would be better to place similar companies in one area to create a demand for specialized environmental protection companies to safely dispose of their waste.
However, if a particular company in one of these industries handles their own waste disposal, they will skimp on costs. Often the result is that they will secretly dispose of waste while environmental protection officials are off duty.
This allows them to cut costs of labor, infrastructure, water and electricity.
This scenario is nothing new to Taiwan.
As an example, a large hog farm used a wastewater treatment plant to dispose of excrement in a method aligned with environmental protection standards.
However, while the farm appeared to meet these standards, it was secretly disposing of the excrement improperly to save money, water and electricity.
Local residents protested when the company’s activities were discovered.
Apart from issuing fines, which do nothing to address the root cause of this problem, the government has stated that it lacks adequate personnel to manage the issue properly.
The government instead addressed the issue by resorting to moral tactics, such as asking the business community whether they have a conscience.
This points to one of the causes of incidents such as the recent wastewater pollution caused by Advanced Semiconductor Engineering Inc (ASE).
The ASE event gained so much attention because the public had assumed that world-famous semiconductor companies such as ASE operate according to environmental protection laws.
However, because of the information appearing in our newspapers, the public has discovered that big companies such as these are major violators of the laws regulating waste disposal.
Before the ASE incident, environmental protection bureaus fined other well-known electronics companies in several areas for their illegal waste disposal.
A sober look at the Environmental Protection Administration’s (EPA) role in the ASE incident reveals that although it appears to be strict, the administration is actually weak in its regulation.
The EPA must carry out full health checks on any company with a record of violating these laws, otherwise the health and quality of life of local residents could be greatly impacted.
If the EPA continues to neglect handling the most basic pollution problems, we cannot expect anything from it once it becomes the environmental resources ministry.
If the ASE incident causes companies to direct their business elsewher, Taiwan could lose its reputation as an electronics industry leader.
In 2002, companies around the world using integrated circuits agreed to use the Green Partner certification as a response to rising environmental awareness.
If cases such as ASE’s environmental pollution are handled inappropriately, companies in need of integrated circuits will redirect their business to other parts of the world.
Yang Ping-shih is a professor at National Taiwan University’s College of Bio-Resources and Agriculture.
Translated by Drew Cameron
French firm DCI-DESCO in April won a bid to upgrade Taiwan’s Lafayette frigates, which has strained ties between China and France. In 1991, France sold Taiwan six Lafayette frigates and in 1992 sold it 60 Mirage 2000 fighter jets. To prevent arms sales between the nations, China negotiated an agreement with France and in 1994 in a joint statement, France promised that there would be no future arms sales to Taiwan. From China’s point of view, the DCI-DESCO deal constitutes a breach of the agreement, but the French stance is that it is not selling Taiwan new weapons, but instead providing a
President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) in her inaugural address on May 20 firmly said: “We will not accept the Beijing authorities’ use of ‘one country, two systems’ to downgrade Taiwan and undermine the cross-strait status quo.” The Chinese government was not too happy, and later that day, an opinion piece on the Web site of China’s state broadcaster China Central Television said: “While Tsai’s first inaugural address four years ago was read by Beijing as an ‘unfinished answer sheet,’ the one she presented this time was even more below-par.” Speaking to the China Review News Agency, Shanghai Institutes for International Studies vice president
The COVID-19 pandemic continues to wreak havoc worldwide. Despite countries being under pressure economically and from the novel coronavirus, China’s National People’s Congress last month passed national security legislation for Hong Kong, a decision that has shocked the world. Let there be no doubt: This move is the beginning of the end of China’s plans for “one country, two systems” in Hong Kong and Taiwan. Proposed amendments to extradition laws last year ignited massive protests in Hong Kong, with millions of participants, shocking the world and making confrontation between government forces and those who opposed the change a permanent part of Hong
Protecting domestic workers Ms Heidi Chang’s (張姮燕) article (“Employers need protections too,” May 24, page 6) made the case that “migrant workers’” rights had improved in Taiwan, but employers’ rights had not, going so far as to complain that all employers are treated equally under the law — as though this was not how the law was supposed to work. The truth is that the rights of foreign blue-collar workers have still not caught up with the rights their employers have always enjoyed. This segment of the foreign community in Taiwan is more likely than other groups to encounter abuse. Recently, a care