We have created an online world whose vastness exceeds our comprehension. As a measure of its magnitude, consider this: Last year, the new Internet address system, IPv6, created more than 340 trillion trillion trillion addresses — that is about 48,000 trillion trillion addresses for every person on Earth. That should be sufficient to service the 5 billion devices that currently connect to the Internet and the 22 billion devices forecast to be in use by 2020.
The hard part of the connectivity explosion is not building capacity, but how it should be managed. We must answer profound questions about the way we live: Should everyone be permanently connected to everything? Who owns which data and how should information be made public? Can and should data use be regulated, and if so, how? What role should government, business and ordinary Web users play in addressing these issues?
Such questions can no longer be ignored. As the virtual world expands, so too do breaches of trust and misuse of personal data. Surveillance has increased public unease — and even paranoia — about state agencies. Private companies that trade in personal data have incited the launch of a “reclaim privacy” movement.
As one delegate at a recent World Economic Forum debate said: “The more connected we have become, the more privacy we have given up.”
However, we can shape our future cyberworld in a way that keeps our data safe, re-establishes trust online and welcomes in billions of new participants. Ensuring security will require that the Internet’s many stakeholders establish some kind of governance system.
Organizations such as the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers will need to become much more global in scope.
At the same time, we must guard against overregulation or government control. This might require us to phase out the Internet Assigned Numbers Authority to prevent it from falling under the control of an intergovernmental body, as some states have demanded.
Governments certainly have an important part to play, but too much control would almost certainly stifle innovation, increase costs and probably exclude important anti-establishment voices. A better approach that would enhance public trust in the system would be to establish diversified stewardship with multiple stakeholders.
One such stakeholder group is business. Now that our personal data have become such a valuable asset, companies are coming under increasing pressure to develop online business models that protect rather than exploit users’ private information. In particular, Internet users want to stop companies befuddling their customers with convoluted and legalistic service agreements to extract and sell their data.
This type of abuse could be limited by creating legal and social contracts to govern the authorization of data use.
One idea, proposed by information scientist Marc Davis, is to draw up a standard, readable seven-point “Terms of Service” agreement that empowers people’s control of the uses of their personal data. Another is to allow users themselves to decide from a preset menu how much personal information they are prepared to share.
Yet the trust issue goes beyond just regulation. Companies must find ways to introduce new technologies and do business that are popular with their customers and retain their trust. In a world of human-robot interfaces, 3D printing, nanotechnology and shale gas extraction, any innovative company must ask itself this basic question.
Finally, we must consider the human dimension of our virtual world. Hyperconnectivity not only creates new commercial opportunities, it also changes the way ordinary people think about their lives. The so-called FOMO (fear of missing out) syndrome reflects the anxieties of a younger generation whose members feel compelled to capture instantly everything they do and see.
Ironically, this hyperconnectivity has increased our insularity, as we increasingly live through our electronic devices. Neuroscientists believe that this may even have altered how we now relate to one another in the real world.
At the heart of this debate is the need to ensure that in a world where many, if not all, of the important details of our lives — including our relationships — exist in cyberperpetuity, people retain, or reclaim, some level of control over their online selves.
While the world of forgetting may have vanished, we can reshape the new one in a way that benefits rather than overwhelms us. Our overriding task is to construct a digital way of life that reinforces our existing sense of ethics and values, with security, trust and fairness at its heart.
Rod Beckstrom is chief security adviser for Samsung Electronics USA and chair of the World Economic Forum’s Global Agenda Council on the Future of the Internet.
Project Syndicate/World Economic Forum/Institute for Human Sciences
Could Asia be on the verge of a new wave of nuclear proliferation? A look back at the early history of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), which recently celebrated its 75th anniversary, illuminates some reasons for concern in the Indo-Pacific today. US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin recently described NATO as “the most powerful and successful alliance in history,” but the organization’s early years were not without challenges. At its inception, the signing of the North Atlantic Treaty marked a sea change in American strategic thinking. The United States had been intent on withdrawing from Europe in the years following
My wife and I spent the week in the interior of Taiwan where Shuyuan spent her childhood. In that town there is a street that functions as an open farmer’s market. Walk along that street, as Shuyuan did yesterday, and it is next to impossible to come home empty-handed. Some mangoes that looked vaguely like others we had seen around here ended up on our table. Shuyuan told how she had bought them from a little old farmer woman from the countryside who said the mangoes were from a very old tree she had on her property. The big surprise
The issue of China’s overcapacity has drawn greater global attention recently, with US Secretary of the Treasury Janet Yellen urging Beijing to address its excess production in key industries during her visit to China last week. Meanwhile in Brussels, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen last week said that Europe must have a tough talk with China on its perceived overcapacity and unfair trade practices. The remarks by Yellen and Von der Leyen come as China’s economy is undergoing a painful transition. Beijing is trying to steer the world’s second-largest economy out of a COVID-19 slump, the property crisis and
As former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) wrapped up his visit to the People’s Republic of China, he received his share of attention. Certainly, the trip must be seen within the full context of Ma’s life, that is, his eight-year presidency, the Sunflower movement and his failed Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement, as well as his eight years as Taipei mayor with its posturing, accusations of money laundering, and ups and downs. Through all that, basic questions stand out: “What drives Ma? What is his end game?” Having observed and commented on Ma for decades, it is all ironically reminiscent of former US president Harry