US Vice President Joe Biden visited China early this month, hoping to soften Beijing’s stance on the newly established East China Sea air defense identification zone (ADIZ) through his “personal relationship” with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平). In the end, they failed to reach any consensus after marathon talks of five and a half hours, as they both stuck to their positions.
Perhaps the only sparkle of the visit came when Biden, who was accompanied by US Ambassador to China Gary Locke, dropped by the consular department at the US embassy in Beijing on Dec. 4 and ran into a line of Chinese visa applicants there. He waved to the hundreds of Chinese visa seekers and said that “innovation can only occur when you breathe free” and encouraged the Chinese people to challenge the government, their teachers and their religious leaders.
The US embassy in Beijing is considered US territory, and what Biden says on US territory does not have very much to do with China. Some Chinese Internet users even mocked his remarks, saying that the Chinese visa seekers he saw at the embassy are going to the US to challenge US President Barack Obama rather than staying in China to challenge Xi.
Chinese dissidents such as Liu Xiaobo (劉曉波), Xu Zhiyong (許志永) and Wang Bingzhang (王炳章) are all in Chinese prisons; this is what happens in China when you challenge the government.
One important thing that Biden did not do during his visit was to personally urge Xi to release Liu and his wife, Liu Xia (劉霞), during his face-to-face meeting with the Chinese president.
Before Biden’s departure to China, Amnesty International, Human Rights Watch and PEN American Center published an open letter to him in which they expressed their hope that he would demand that Beijing release Liu, the 2010 Nobel Peace Prize laureate, stop harassing his wife, and reiterate the US’ feeling of responsibility on the human rights issue.
In their open letter, the three organizations said:
“We understand that there are a plethora of important issues that you will be discussing when you are in Beijing, but we hope that this will be one of them. Please continue to raise Liu Xiaobo’s case at every available opportunity and demand that authorities end all forms of repression and intimidation of his family, including freeing Liu Xia from extralegal house arrest.”
Regrettably, Biden did not make public mention of this vicious example of China’s human rights violations.
Both Obama and Biden are second-rate politicians. They see the business opportunities in the Chinese market, but they do not see the trap lurking in the background. They merely see Xi’s smile, but forget that he is a dictator who hides a knife behind his smile.
Back in 1987, then-US president Ronald Reagan challenged then-Soviet Union leader Mikhail Gorbachev to destroy the Berlin Wall during a speech in front of the wall, saying:
“General Secretary Gorbachev, if you seek peace, if you seek prosperity for the Soviet Union and eastern Europe, if you seek liberalization, come here to this gate. Mr Gorbachev, open this gate. Mr Gorbachev, tear down this wall!”
How brave and determined Reagan was.
As Reagan’s speechwriter Peter Robinson once recalled some years later, the speech was fundamentally a moral call, a moral challenge to Gorbachev. It was a call Reagan explicitly insisted on making, rejecting the opposition of the US Department of State and the National Security Council (NSC).
Robinson also said that all the career diplomats at the state department and the NSC had a good education and had been given the best training, but that throughout their professional careers, they learned to follow the rules and conventions, forgetting the confrontation between justice and injustice and between freedom and authoritarianism.
He added that viewing an issue from a moral perspective made them uncomfortable, because it clashed with their mode of thinking.
When Reagan urged Gorbachev to tear down the Berlin Wall, he said something that the general public dared not say or even think. His remarks triggered the public’s imagination and their thirst for freedom and democracy.
We can only hope that a great statesman with Reagan’s vision, wisdom and courage will appear in the US. We must not forget that a tyrant is not a friend.
Yu Jie is an exiled Chinese author in the US.
Translated by Eddy Chang
Saudi Arabian largesse is flooding Egypt’s cultural scene, but the reception is mixed. Some welcome new “cooperation” between two regional powerhouses, while others fear a hostile takeover by Riyadh. In Cairo, historically the cultural capital of the Arab world, Egyptian Minister of Culture Nevine al-Kilany recently hosted Saudi Arabian General Entertainment Authority chairman Turki al-Sheikh. The deep-pocketed al-Sheikh has emerged as a Medici-like patron for Egypt’s cultural elite, courted by Cairo’s top talent to produce a slew of forthcoming films. A new three-way agreement between al-Sheikh, Kilany and United Media Services — a multi-media conglomerate linked to state intelligence that owns much of
The US and other countries should take concrete steps to confront the threats from Beijing to avoid war, US Representative Mario Diaz-Balart said in an interview with Voice of America on March 13. The US should use “every diplomatic economic tool at our disposal to treat China as what it is... to avoid war,” Diaz-Balart said. Giving an example of what the US could do, he said that it has to be more aggressive in its military sales to Taiwan. Actions by cross-party US lawmakers in the past few years such as meeting with Taiwanese officials in Washington and Taipei, and
The Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan has no official diplomatic allies in the EU. With the exception of the Vatican, it has no official allies in Europe at all. This does not prevent the ROC — Taiwan — from having close relations with EU member states and other European countries. The exact nature of the relationship does bear revisiting, if only to clarify what is a very complicated and sensitive idea, the details of which leave considerable room for misunderstanding, misrepresentation and disagreement. Only this week, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) received members of the European Parliament’s Delegation for Relations
Denmark’s “one China” policy more and more resembles Beijing’s “one China” principle. At least, this is how things appear. In recent interactions with the Danish state, such as applying for residency permits, a Taiwanese’s nationality would be listed as “China.” That designation occurs for a Taiwanese student coming to Denmark or a Danish citizen arriving in Denmark with, for example, their Taiwanese partner. Details of this were published on Sunday in an article in the Danish daily Berlingske written by Alexander Sjoberg and Tobias Reinwald. The pretext for this new practice is that Denmark does not recognize Taiwan as a state under