No one should be surprised at what the “middle kingdom” is doing it at this precarious time. After all, China’s territorial map was redrawn many times during the last two centuries, and in most cases it shrank, with imperial guns held against its head. Suffering from countless humiliations, but unable to seek revenge against stronger hands like Russia, China instead invaded and annexed Tibet, a defenseless territory.
This time, China is drawing red lines in thin air over the East China Sea.
However, the altitude of the new air defense identification zone (ADIZ) is missing. It is not clear how far the outer limit of the zone penetrates into the third dimension — space. Does it reach only the commercial aircraft cruising-height of about 13,000m? Or does it reach to 30,000m, the altitude U2 spy planes operate at, or 90,000m, the altitude of a polar orbiting satellite?
Actually, the red zone height that Beijing has in mind is not an altitude, but is dependent upon US President Barack Obama’s focus and resolve. If China faces a stern face with grinding teeth from Obama, the height will drop to several thousand meters, a level that is suitable for drones. On the other hand, if there is acquiescence, it will extend all the way to the sky over Washington.
China is floating a gigantic test balloon and taunting the US, Japan and South Korea to puncture it, if they dare.
Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) senses a golden opportunity to probe Obama, whose popularity is sinking domestically. Xi so far seems to grasp well the gravity and limitations of his move.
More than two decades ago, Moscow shot down a South Korean commercial aircraft it claimed had violated its air defense zone. Does China contemplate a similar move?
Given its dependence on foreign investment, China should think twice before taking such action. After all, China’s zone extends beyond its territorial waters and exclusive economic zone in the East China Sea.
The country’s interest will be better served by dispatching its newly completed aircraft carrier to the area.
At least a sea level, surface-to-surface confrontation at low speed is much more manageable than a high-speed midair collision.
Kengchi Goah is a senior research fellow at the US-based Taiwan Public Policy Council.
Could Asia be on the verge of a new wave of nuclear proliferation? A look back at the early history of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), which recently celebrated its 75th anniversary, illuminates some reasons for concern in the Indo-Pacific today. US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin recently described NATO as “the most powerful and successful alliance in history,” but the organization’s early years were not without challenges. At its inception, the signing of the North Atlantic Treaty marked a sea change in American strategic thinking. The United States had been intent on withdrawing from Europe in the years following
My wife and I spent the week in the interior of Taiwan where Shuyuan spent her childhood. In that town there is a street that functions as an open farmer’s market. Walk along that street, as Shuyuan did yesterday, and it is next to impossible to come home empty-handed. Some mangoes that looked vaguely like others we had seen around here ended up on our table. Shuyuan told how she had bought them from a little old farmer woman from the countryside who said the mangoes were from a very old tree she had on her property. The big surprise
The issue of China’s overcapacity has drawn greater global attention recently, with US Secretary of the Treasury Janet Yellen urging Beijing to address its excess production in key industries during her visit to China last week. Meanwhile in Brussels, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen last week said that Europe must have a tough talk with China on its perceived overcapacity and unfair trade practices. The remarks by Yellen and Von der Leyen come as China’s economy is undergoing a painful transition. Beijing is trying to steer the world’s second-largest economy out of a COVID-19 slump, the property crisis and
As former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) wrapped up his visit to the People’s Republic of China, he received his share of attention. Certainly, the trip must be seen within the full context of Ma’s life, that is, his eight-year presidency, the Sunflower movement and his failed Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement, as well as his eight years as Taipei mayor with its posturing, accusations of money laundering, and ups and downs. Through all that, basic questions stand out: “What drives Ma? What is his end game?” Having observed and commented on Ma for decades, it is all ironically reminiscent of former US president Harry