Taroko Gorge is one of the wonders of the natural world and Taiwanese are justly proud and protective of it. The establishment of the Toroko National Park in 1986 was a major step forward in the preservation of the park’s beauty and resources.
The Ministry of Culture, and doubtless many others in Taiwan, would like to see the park included among UNESCO’s World Heritage Sites, along with other sites. However, it appears too willing to sell out the nation’s sovereignty if that is what it takes to get places in Taiwan on the list.
Since the establishment of the World Heritage Sites list, following UNESCO’s adoption of the Convention Concerning the Protection of the World Cultural and Natural Heritage in 1972, the list has grown to include 981 sites.
The catch-22 is that a country has to be a signatory to the convention in order to nominate sites for the list, and only UN member states are eligible to sign the treaty. The Republic of China is no longer a member of the UN. However, the People’s Republic of China signed the convention in December 1975 and now has more than 40 sites on the heritage list.
Minister of Culture Lung Ying-tai (龍應台) on Thursday said the ministry was interested in working with China to nominate places in Taiwan and had asked if the idea could be discussed during cross-strait talks. She said cultural heritage supersedes ideological differences and is distinct from politics.
“We hope to collaborate with Beijing on the basis of mutual respect and spirit of cooperation,” she said, adding that Taiwanese sites would “absolutely not” be listed under the Chinese government.
Leaving aside the issue of whether Beijing has ever shown “mutual respect” to Taiwan, it is clear that Lung needs to take a course in politics and history.
Beijing has long appropriated icons that do not belong to it to press its sovereignty claims. In late 2003 there was an uproar in Taiwan after the People’s Bank of China issued “The Chinese Island of Taiwan” set of collectable coins, which featured Chaotien Temple in Yunlin County and Chihkan Tower (Fort Provintia) in what is now Greater Tainan. Tainan’s cultural affairs department labeled the coins “an act of cultural appropriation.”
Looking at the list of sites in China on the heritage list, one cannot help but be struck by the cruel irony of the descriptions of the Potala Palace in Lhasa, which was added in 1994 for being an “exceptional symbol of the integration of secular and religious authority.” The Potala “inscription” was later expanded to include the Jokhang Temple Monastery and the Dalai Lamas’ summer palace, Norbulingka.
The description of the Potala Palace says that it “symbolizes Tibetan Buddhism and its central role in the traditional administration of Tibet.” As for Norbulingka, there is a note that “since the departure of the 14th Dalai Lama in 1959,” the palace has been managed by the Cultural Management Committee and Bureau of the Tibet Autonomous Region.
“Departure” is such a benign word, as opposed to “fled for his life.” And while Beijing is happy to promote the Potala Palace to prove its ownership of Tibet, for decades it has done everything it can to destroy Tibetan Buddhism and take the “Tibet” out of Tibetans. Perhaps the cadres in Beijing forgot to tell UNESCO that the Jokhang is frequently closed to Tibetans and others who would like to worship there.
Beijing has repeatedly proven itself unhelpful when it comes to interactions between Taiwan and world organizations, including demanding that information during the SARS epidemic be routed through it to pass on to Taipei.
Seeking Beijing’s “help” to get Taroko on the World Heritage Sites list to preserve it would do little to help preserve Taiwan’s sovereignty or identity on the world stage. For the rulers in Beijing, nothing supersedes ideology and nothing is distinct from politics. Anyone who thinks otherwise is a fool.
Could Asia be on the verge of a new wave of nuclear proliferation? A look back at the early history of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), which recently celebrated its 75th anniversary, illuminates some reasons for concern in the Indo-Pacific today. US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin recently described NATO as “the most powerful and successful alliance in history,” but the organization’s early years were not without challenges. At its inception, the signing of the North Atlantic Treaty marked a sea change in American strategic thinking. The United States had been intent on withdrawing from Europe in the years following
My wife and I spent the week in the interior of Taiwan where Shuyuan spent her childhood. In that town there is a street that functions as an open farmer’s market. Walk along that street, as Shuyuan did yesterday, and it is next to impossible to come home empty-handed. Some mangoes that looked vaguely like others we had seen around here ended up on our table. Shuyuan told how she had bought them from a little old farmer woman from the countryside who said the mangoes were from a very old tree she had on her property. The big surprise
The issue of China’s overcapacity has drawn greater global attention recently, with US Secretary of the Treasury Janet Yellen urging Beijing to address its excess production in key industries during her visit to China last week. Meanwhile in Brussels, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen last week said that Europe must have a tough talk with China on its perceived overcapacity and unfair trade practices. The remarks by Yellen and Von der Leyen come as China’s economy is undergoing a painful transition. Beijing is trying to steer the world’s second-largest economy out of a COVID-19 slump, the property crisis and
The past few months have seen tremendous strides in India’s journey to develop a vibrant semiconductor and electronics ecosystem. The nation’s established prowess in information technology (IT) has earned it much-needed revenue and prestige across the globe. Now, through the convergence of engineering talent, supportive government policies, an expanding market and technologically adaptive entrepreneurship, India is striving to become part of global electronics and semiconductor supply chains. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Vision of “Make in India” and “Design in India” has been the guiding force behind the government’s incentive schemes that span skilling, design, fabrication, assembly, testing and packaging, and