Legislators have proposed a draft sentence commutation act (罪犯減刑條例) that, in contrast to the version enacted in 2007, seeks only to alleviate the excessive intake plaguing the nation’s prisons, without proposing a more comprehensive policy on crime. If adopted, the subsequent social costs of the draft act would be considerable.
After a criminal verdict is handed down, what is referred to as a res judicata comes into play: The matter has been judged and the verdict cannot be questioned or overturned by any means other than through a retrial or extraordinary appeal.
Article 40 of the Republic of China Constitution grants the president the power to remit sentences, and grant amnesties and pardons. The exercise of these powers would mean overturning a verdict and therefore would present a serious threat to the stability of the law. Such powers should not be exercised lightly.
If the proposed act is passed, it would be paramount to clearly identifying cases for which sentence remission might be a consideration and which would not, since reduced sentences cannot be applied across the board.
Serious crimes and crimes that have a high recidivism rate should not be eligible for sentence remission. However, it is not easy to ascertain what constitutes a serious crime, nor is it simple to set clear standards to determine recidivism rates.
In some cases, such as sex or drug offenses and organized crime, the decision could be more clear-cut. The complexity of this issue illustrates that it is one thing for legislators to decide on such matters and another to ensure that the decisions are fair.
If the proposed act is passed, it will mean that someone convicted of a crime that is considered appropriate for sentence commutation could have their sentence reduced irrespective of whether they have been fully rehabilitated.
This, coupled with the absence of a comprehensive process to determine a recidivism rate or suitability for sentence reduction, means the draft act focuses exclusively on ameliorating prison overcrowding. And a sudden increase in reduced sentences will only generate enormous pressure on the maintenance of public order.
When amendments were made to the Criminal Code in 2005, the judiciary implemented a two-tier system in which the perpetrators of serious crimes were given heavy sanctions, while those who committed less serious offenses were given non-custodial sentences.
As a result, to ameliorate the problem of prison overcrowding within the current criminal justice system, prosecutors have the option of negotiating a deferred prosecution agreement for less grievous crimes that would normally carry a custodial sentence of no more than three years, while judges can mete out suspended sentences or commute custodial sentences to a fine or community service.
These options are selected while considering a balance between recidivism and institutionalization. However, simply reducing or truncating sentences as a solution may well create more social problems.
Wu Ching-chin is an associate professor of law at Aletheia University.
Translated by Paul Cooper
Congressman Mike Gallagher (R-WI) and Congressman Raja Krishnamoorthi (D-IL) led a bipartisan delegation to Taiwan in late February. During their various meetings with Taiwan’s leaders, this delegation never missed an opportunity to emphasize the strength of their cross-party consensus on issues relating to Taiwan and China. Gallagher and Krishnamoorthi are leaders of the House Select Committee on the Chinese Communist Party. Their instruction upon taking the reins of the committee was to preserve China issues as a last bastion of bipartisanship in an otherwise deeply divided Washington. They have largely upheld their pledge. But in doing so, they have performed the
It is well known that Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) ambition is to rejuvenate the Chinese nation by unification of Taiwan, either peacefully or by force. The peaceful option has virtually gone out of the window with the last presidential elections in Taiwan. Taiwanese, especially the youth, are resolved not to be part of China. With time, this resolve has grown politically stronger. It leaves China with reunification by force as the default option. Everyone tells me how and when mighty China would invade and overpower tiny Taiwan. However, I have rarely been told that Taiwan could be defended to
It should have been Maestro’s night. It is hard to envision a film more Oscar-friendly than Bradley Cooper’s exploration of the life and loves of famed conductor and composer Leonard Bernstein. It was a prestige biopic, a longtime route to acting trophies and more (see Darkest Hour, Lincoln, and Milk). The film was a music biopic, a subgenre with an even richer history of award-winning films such as Ray, Walk the Line and Bohemian Rhapsody. What is more, it was the passion project of cowriter, producer, director and actor Bradley Cooper. That is the kind of multitasking -for-his-art overachievement that Oscar
Chinese villages are being built in the disputed zone between Bhutan and China. Last month, Chinese settlers, holding photographs of Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平), moved into their new homes on land that was not Xi’s to give. These residents are part of the Chinese government’s resettlement program, relocating Tibetan families into the territory China claims. China shares land borders with 15 countries and sea borders with eight, and is involved in many disputes. Land disputes include the ones with Bhutan (Doklam plateau), India (Arunachal Pradesh, Aksai Chin) and Nepal (near Dolakha and Solukhumbu districts). Maritime disputes in the South China