“O my friends, there is no friend.”
With this line, attributed to Aristotle, the French philosopher Jacques Derrida opened Politics of Friendship, his treatise on friendship and its political implications.
As Taiwan’s last ambassador to South Africa, Loh I-cheng (陸以正) paid homage to former South African president Nelson Mandela on Friday.
Loh spoke of a close personal relationship with Mandela, though his reminiscences were tinged with bitterness over the then-president’s decision to switch ties to the People’s Republic of China (PRC) in 1996.
The switch was hardly a bombshell. Even before Mandela told Loh, Taiwanese officials were well aware that the influence of the South African Communist Party on Mandela’s African National Congress (ANC) made continued official relations untenable.
Mandela, who visited Taipei and Beijing as ANC head in 1993, most likely angled for dual recognition. However, any suggestion of such a bed sharing arrangement was stymied by China, just as it had been when Niger attempted to do similarly the year before (albeit after several weeks of wrangling).
Loh’s recollection of being “infuriated” doubtless reflects the frustration of any diplomat who has seen weed-killing realpolitik poured on the roots of a relationship that took years to cultivate. In the end, the “human touch,” which Loh ascribed to Mandela, counted for little.
While Loh seems to have been realistic about the inevitability of the situation, his chagrin brought to mind a series of columns by the career diplomat Bernard Joei (芮正皋) which ran in the China Post from 1993 to 1996.
Collected under the title In Search of Justice, these ruminations are a fine example of the delusional spin employed by Taipei in appraising developments in Taiwan-South Africa relations as they unfurled.
Joei wrote of Mandela’s decision to “cow down to communist China’s pressure,” sententiously adding that “by doing so, Mandela has gone against his own high standard of morality and created a situation that shall not reflect favorably on him in the history books.”
Repeatedly and glibly invoking the term “neo-apartheid” in relation to the PRC’s effort to isolate Taiwan, Joei expressed shock at Mandela’s about-face.
How could a man who overcame the injustices of apartheid be “hopping into bed with a [PRC] regime scorned the world over for its abuses of human rights, dictatorship, intolerance of opposing political views and mistreatment of ethnic minorities?” Joei asked.
The holier-than-thou bleating descends into full-blown slapstick in one column where Joei, a former charge d’affaires and ambassador to several African nations, draws parallels between the ROC and the ANC.
They were founded in the same year, Joei po-facedly prattles: “Just as the ANC struggled against apartheid, the ROC fought ruthless warlords and Japanese aggression to stay alive.”
If this comparison is not exactly watertight, perhaps another is more apposite. In 1993, South African academic Peter Vale spoke on the future of Taiwan-South Africa relations at a conference in Taipei sponsored by the Democratic Progressive Party.
Vale said that Taiwan and South Africa belonged to a group of pariah nations — including Chile and Israel — which had become known as the “Fifth World.”
These countries shared a number of characteristics: They were governed by immigrants or their descendants, they had achieved a degree of economic development that was the envy of their neighbors and they were the targets of communist agitation.
Once the “pariah bond” was ruptured by the end of apartheid, the outcome was inevitable.
Economic considerations were about the only card Taipei had left to play. However, while South Africa’s trade with Taiwan was at roughly twice the volume of its trade with Beijing at the time of the split, the new ANC government was clearly thinking ahead.
Taiwanese officials attempted to scaremonger by suggesting that trade with the PRC would actually damage the South African economy as China was a direct competitor. Naturally, this desperate last gambit failed. As of last year, the PRC remains South Africa’s No. 1 trade partner, with two-fifths of the combined volume of US$19.4 billion flowing in Pretoria’s direction.
Across the world, memories appeared short last week as representatives of political parties that vilified Mandela engaged in hagiography. However, the old guard of the KMT is on even shakier ground than Britain’s Tories when it comes to apotheosizing Mandela.
As a pair of pariahs, Taiwan and apartheid-era South Africa were back-scratching bedfellows. Along with Israel, Taiwan facilitated the Botha government’s nuclear program in the 1980s, while the international community stood back. The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) government of former president Chiang Ching-kuo (蔣經國) hailed the regime as a bulwark against communism while acquiescing in the perpetuation of a wicked system of repression. And why not? For in the subjugation of a people by a minority, immigrant regime, it was presented with its own reflection.
By the end of the 1980s, the ANC already had ties with twice as many nations as South Africa. Some countries were later than others jumping the sinking ship of apartheid. Despite its last-minute attempts to salvage something from the wreckage by wooing Mandela and the ANC, the KMT government was still clinging to the railings of a rotten vessel as it went down. This should not be forgotten.
James Baron is a freelance journalist and writer. He previously worked for the Taiwan International Cooperation and Development Fund.
Could Asia be on the verge of a new wave of nuclear proliferation? A look back at the early history of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), which recently celebrated its 75th anniversary, illuminates some reasons for concern in the Indo-Pacific today. US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin recently described NATO as “the most powerful and successful alliance in history,” but the organization’s early years were not without challenges. At its inception, the signing of the North Atlantic Treaty marked a sea change in American strategic thinking. The United States had been intent on withdrawing from Europe in the years following
My wife and I spent the week in the interior of Taiwan where Shuyuan spent her childhood. In that town there is a street that functions as an open farmer’s market. Walk along that street, as Shuyuan did yesterday, and it is next to impossible to come home empty-handed. Some mangoes that looked vaguely like others we had seen around here ended up on our table. Shuyuan told how she had bought them from a little old farmer woman from the countryside who said the mangoes were from a very old tree she had on her property. The big surprise
The issue of China’s overcapacity has drawn greater global attention recently, with US Secretary of the Treasury Janet Yellen urging Beijing to address its excess production in key industries during her visit to China last week. Meanwhile in Brussels, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen last week said that Europe must have a tough talk with China on its perceived overcapacity and unfair trade practices. The remarks by Yellen and Von der Leyen come as China’s economy is undergoing a painful transition. Beijing is trying to steer the world’s second-largest economy out of a COVID-19 slump, the property crisis and
As former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) wrapped up his visit to the People’s Republic of China, he received his share of attention. Certainly, the trip must be seen within the full context of Ma’s life, that is, his eight-year presidency, the Sunflower movement and his failed Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement, as well as his eight years as Taipei mayor with its posturing, accusations of money laundering, and ups and downs. Through all that, basic questions stand out: “What drives Ma? What is his end game?” Having observed and commented on Ma for decades, it is all ironically reminiscent of former US president Harry