According to Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) data, third-quarter economic growth dropped to 1.58 percent, a decline of 0.89 percentage points from the 2.47 percent forecast in August. The main reason for this was that exports, consumption and investment all fell short of expectations. In addition, exports declined last month, and September exports declined more than expected compared with the same period last year.
The continued drop last month implies that annual economic growth will be worse than expected. Originally, annual growth was forecast at 4 percent, but now no one is willing to predict that it will reach 2 percent.
DGBAS Minister Shih Su-mei (石素梅) says GDP for the year will be adjusted downward, although, absurdly, the directorate has already done so 10 times this year. The Taiwan Institute of Economic Research (TIER) has said that economic growth will fall short of the 2 percent mark, so it is time for the government to stop misleading the public.
At a meeting on improving the economy on July 30, President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) said that economic growth would be stimulated through three growth engines — the establishment of “free economic pilot zones,” expanded public construction and export growth.
The most important thing for building economic momentum will be to increase private consumption and consumer confidence. There are three main reasons why Ma’s three growth engines will not become driving forces for economic growth any time soon.
First, when it comes to the pilot zones, Taiwan’s economic structure is not helped by governance by slogan. Second, 10 percent of GDP to expand public construction is not enough, and it will not do much to build momentum. Third, in terms of export growth, Taiwanese industry is responding too slowly to dynamic international competition and it is unable to create results.
An increase in consumer spending, which is falling sharply, is required to promote economic growth. The ability to do so will be affected by three factors: Public confidence in government policy has hit rock bottom as the recent food safety issues are becoming a national security issue, fuel and electricity price increases brought commodity price increases, which is increasing public suffering, and real incomes have dropped to the same levels as 16 years ago, which is leading to sharp drops in consumer spending.
To build economic momentum, the government must start all over again. Doing so requires pragmatic and fundamental changes. The top financial officials place great importance on slogans, but they are incapable of focusing on pragmatic economic growth policies and are overconfident in their judgement. Their economic decisions have set some critical traps, and their explanations for their inability to meet growth expectations are deceiving themselves and the public.
The government should give serious consideration to the following pragmatic approaches to building economic growth: First, it should figure out how to build public confidence in government policy instead of treating public opinion with animosity and implementing policy that goes directly against it. Second, it should control and limit price increases, and control and manage food safety so that it does not deteriorate further. Third, it should work hard at increasing real wages and building confidence among domestic consumers.
The most urgent task is to increase private consumption to stimulate the economy and kickstart economic growth.
Kuo Chen-hero is an adjunct professor in the School of Business at Soochow University.
Translated by Perry Svensson
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
Since the Russian invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, people have been asking if Taiwan is the next Ukraine. At a G7 meeting of national leaders in January, Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida warned that Taiwan “could be the next Ukraine” if Chinese aggression is not checked. NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg has said that if Russia is not defeated, then “today, it’s Ukraine, tomorrow it can be Taiwan.” China does not like this rhetoric. Its diplomats ask people to stop saying “Ukraine today, Taiwan tomorrow.” However, the rhetoric and stated ambition of Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) on Taiwan shows strong parallels with