A ruckus has ensued following a minor incident during singer Deserts Chang’s (張懸) concert at the University of Manchester, England, on Nov. 2, when Chang displayed a Republic of China flag on stage and was shouted at by a student from China.
The incident has kindled a blaze of indignant reactions from Internet users in Hong Kong and Taiwan, with many accusing young people in China of being brainwashed and fanatically nationalist among other things.
However, a comment about the incident from a student in China tells a different story. Those who think that young people in China are one big crowd of brainwashed, angry youth might like to read the message. They might discover that they have got the wrong idea.
The student’s message reads as follows: “Freedom is precious and very fragile. I don’t think the quest for freedom will ever end. If you agree with me and what I just said, please click on ‘like’ and share it to let the whole world know that young people in China are definitely not all the kind who would yell ‘No politics today!’ at Chang. They are not all the kind of people who have been made into mental slaves by political oppression and who do not care about politics or dare to talk about it, even when they are abroad.”
“There are other people in this country who want to stand up and do something, even if they know it is futile, and who keep up their moral and even physical courage and set out to achieve their ideals,” the message said.
In China’s online world, political control creates an environment in which it is hard for the voices of people who do not trust the government to get much attention. However, those who are familiar with the way the Internet works in China would say that if the Internet were not so tightly monitored and controlled, and if people were not so worried about speaking their mind, it is hard to say which side would have the loudest voice — the fervent nationalists or the likes of the student who wrote the message.
While some people get carried away with nationalistic fervor, most members of Chinese society say nothing, but their silence does not mean that they have no opinions. These days it is clear that some people in the government and society at large have realized that overheated nationalistic sentiments might turn into their opposite and could even cause trouble for the authorities.
As a result, two contradictory trends can be seen in what the Chinese government says and does. On one hand, Chinese media keep using the same old methods to whip up nationalistic feelings, but on the other hand the authorities can be seen doing everything they can to cool down popular nationalism when it looks as though it might get out of control.
This contradiction shows the predicament in which the Chinese government often finds itself. It comes under pressure from its supporters as well as those who have less faith in it, and a regime that exists without an electoral basis will eventually find that even its supporters cannot necessarily be relied on.
In an ever more diverse society, a government that thinks it can establish and consolidate its legitimacy by manipulating nationalism is only making trouble for itself.
This needs to be carefully considered when reading what Internet users have to say about Xinjiang, Tibet and other such issues.
Wang Dan is a visiting associate professor at National Tsing Hua University’s College of Humanities and Social Sciences.
Translated by Julian Clegg
Saudi Arabian largesse is flooding Egypt’s cultural scene, but the reception is mixed. Some welcome new “cooperation” between two regional powerhouses, while others fear a hostile takeover by Riyadh. In Cairo, historically the cultural capital of the Arab world, Egyptian Minister of Culture Nevine al-Kilany recently hosted Saudi Arabian General Entertainment Authority chairman Turki al-Sheikh. The deep-pocketed al-Sheikh has emerged as a Medici-like patron for Egypt’s cultural elite, courted by Cairo’s top talent to produce a slew of forthcoming films. A new three-way agreement between al-Sheikh, Kilany and United Media Services — a multi-media conglomerate linked to state intelligence that owns much of
The US and other countries should take concrete steps to confront the threats from Beijing to avoid war, US Representative Mario Diaz-Balart said in an interview with Voice of America on March 13. The US should use “every diplomatic economic tool at our disposal to treat China as what it is... to avoid war,” Diaz-Balart said. Giving an example of what the US could do, he said that it has to be more aggressive in its military sales to Taiwan. Actions by cross-party US lawmakers in the past few years such as meeting with Taiwanese officials in Washington and Taipei, and
Denmark’s “one China” policy more and more resembles Beijing’s “one China” principle. At least, this is how things appear. In recent interactions with the Danish state, such as applying for residency permits, a Taiwanese’s nationality would be listed as “China.” That designation occurs for a Taiwanese student coming to Denmark or a Danish citizen arriving in Denmark with, for example, their Taiwanese partner. Details of this were published on Sunday in an article in the Danish daily Berlingske written by Alexander Sjoberg and Tobias Reinwald. The pretext for this new practice is that Denmark does not recognize Taiwan as a state under
The Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan has no official diplomatic allies in the EU. With the exception of the Vatican, it has no official allies in Europe at all. This does not prevent the ROC — Taiwan — from having close relations with EU member states and other European countries. The exact nature of the relationship does bear revisiting, if only to clarify what is a very complicated and sensitive idea, the details of which leave considerable room for misunderstanding, misrepresentation and disagreement. Only this week, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) received members of the European Parliament’s Delegation for Relations