Years ago, Taiwan was reportedly advised not to develop nuclear weaponry. The advice may appear justified given the devices’ destructive power and possible, uncontrollable consequences. However, Taiwan should not also be prohibited from developing laser defense technologies, which would provide the country with precision targeting capabilities at minimal risk of collateral damage.
High-powered lasers are efficient cutting tools and are widely implemented in the automotive and other manufacturing industries. Extending the technology for use in national defense has long been expected, and the US military has already claimed to have knocked down a drone with a high-precision laser beam.
Lasers can be categorized into two groups: chemical and solid-state. Solid-state lasers are more transportable and are therefore preferred.
Solid-state devices are also desirable due to their use of electric power, which is much easier to generate and to store in highly mobile platforms containing a generator and batteries.
The technology to process portable electric power and drive large arrays of laser emitters already exists, as do precision optics that can collect, focus, and shape multiple-array beams into a high-power pencil beam. With advanced sensors, computer programs and guidance technology, high-power laser beams can be guided to lock on to a hostile object. The laser will then spot-heat the target, meaning that it can easily cut through the object’s thick metal casing. As a result, the hostile object will either cease functioning or self-destruct due to internal over-heating and possible resultant explosions.
Taiwan has the technical capabilities and financial resources to support the development of a high-powered, laser-based missile defense system.
Such a program would also be beneficial for civilian businesses, even if its military goal is denied or fails to come to fruition. Optical technology — for example the development and manufacture of digital cameras — is widely recognized as an economic engine with dual purposes: military and civilian. Developments made in one area find their way into the other, and resources spent in either will not be wasted.
Taiwan should seriously consider this option.
Kengchi Goah is a senior research fellow at the US-based Taiwan Public Policy Council.
Saudi Arabian largesse is flooding Egypt’s cultural scene, but the reception is mixed. Some welcome new “cooperation” between two regional powerhouses, while others fear a hostile takeover by Riyadh. In Cairo, historically the cultural capital of the Arab world, Egyptian Minister of Culture Nevine al-Kilany recently hosted Saudi Arabian General Entertainment Authority chairman Turki al-Sheikh. The deep-pocketed al-Sheikh has emerged as a Medici-like patron for Egypt’s cultural elite, courted by Cairo’s top talent to produce a slew of forthcoming films. A new three-way agreement between al-Sheikh, Kilany and United Media Services — a multi-media conglomerate linked to state intelligence that owns much of
The US and other countries should take concrete steps to confront the threats from Beijing to avoid war, US Representative Mario Diaz-Balart said in an interview with Voice of America on March 13. The US should use “every diplomatic economic tool at our disposal to treat China as what it is... to avoid war,” Diaz-Balart said. Giving an example of what the US could do, he said that it has to be more aggressive in its military sales to Taiwan. Actions by cross-party US lawmakers in the past few years such as meeting with Taiwanese officials in Washington and Taipei, and
The Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan has no official diplomatic allies in the EU. With the exception of the Vatican, it has no official allies in Europe at all. This does not prevent the ROC — Taiwan — from having close relations with EU member states and other European countries. The exact nature of the relationship does bear revisiting, if only to clarify what is a very complicated and sensitive idea, the details of which leave considerable room for misunderstanding, misrepresentation and disagreement. Only this week, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) received members of the European Parliament’s Delegation for Relations
Denmark’s “one China” policy more and more resembles Beijing’s “one China” principle. At least, this is how things appear. In recent interactions with the Danish state, such as applying for residency permits, a Taiwanese’s nationality would be listed as “China.” That designation occurs for a Taiwanese student coming to Denmark or a Danish citizen arriving in Denmark with, for example, their Taiwanese partner. Details of this were published on Sunday in an article in the Danish daily Berlingske written by Alexander Sjoberg and Tobias Reinwald. The pretext for this new practice is that Denmark does not recognize Taiwan as a state under