Central bank Governor Perng Fai-nan (彭淮南) last week engaged in yet another debate with Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co chairman Morris Chang (張忠謀) over the bank’s foreign exchange rate policy and the true value of the New Taiwan dollar. The men have been debating what level the NT dollar should be valued at for the past five years.
People have different views about whether the NT dollar should be allowed to depreciate to boost export growth or strengthened to make imports cheaper. No policy change can please both exporters and importers.
The currency policy is nearly as mysterious as the interest rate policy, yet its fundamental task is just as important to everyday life.
There is no doubt that the central bank under Perng’s leadership has for years used various monetary tools to fine tune currency and interest rates to maintain stability in consumer prices and financial markets. There are signs of increased global demand ahead given the recovering purchasing managers’ index and leading economic indicators in major economies, but why does growth momentum remain weak?
The nation witnessed a poor 1.58 percent annual GDP growth in the third quarter and a continued contraction in exports last month. Apparently, the currency policy is not sufficient to heal the nation’s economic wounds.
An important message behind the Perng-Chang debate is that there is real concern about declining competitiveness and the weakening economy. Even though the economy is likely to improve next year thanks to the continued global recovery, one has to be skeptical about the strength of near-term growth and the sustainability of long-term development considering the drop in foreign investment, declining government investment and still-weak consumer spending.
Regardless of whether Taiwan can attain 2 percent annual growth for this year, Taiwan Research Institute founder Liu Tai-ying (劉泰英) said last week that the weaker exports performance reflects not the central bank’s currency policy, but the lower added value that Taiwanese products generate. In other words, if there is no demand for Taiwanese goods in overseas markets because of poor added value, it does not matter how cheap they are.
Therefore, two things are important. First, why have Taiwanese manufacturers lagged behind their rivals in upgrading their technology and failed to develop high value-added products? Second, why has the government failed to attract and guide investment into production in the real economy instead of leaving money to flow into equities and real-estate markets?
Perng and Chang’s debate over the true value of the NT dollar is likely to continue in the foreseeable future, but people should not misunderstand the message behind their debate. The nation’s inability to deal with the slowness in the production of high value-added products and the government’s poor policymaking will likely push the economy into a vicious cycle and, as Liu suggested, Taiwan may begin to experience Japan’s “lost decade” very soon.
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
Since the Russian invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, people have been asking if Taiwan is the next Ukraine. At a G7 meeting of national leaders in January, Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida warned that Taiwan “could be the next Ukraine” if Chinese aggression is not checked. NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg has said that if Russia is not defeated, then “today, it’s Ukraine, tomorrow it can be Taiwan.” China does not like this rhetoric. Its diplomats ask people to stop saying “Ukraine today, Taiwan tomorrow.” However, the rhetoric and stated ambition of Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) on Taiwan shows strong parallels with