The government should consider scrapping the trading platform for Taiwan depositary receipts (TDR), as it has failed to achieve its goal of boosting local stock market turnover and has only created a financial loophole, with overseas TDR issuers not required to report their financial statements to local regulators like other locally listed stocks.
Based on the Financial Supervisory Commission’s rules, TDR issuers are not required to file regular revenue or earnings reports, as they already do so in the stock exchanges where they are listed. As such, TDR investors can only gain indirect access to these companies’ financial statements through their local agents. The commission seems to think that this is enough for investors to track their investments, but is it?
The lack of financial transparency is a vital reason why many consider TDRs unattractive or unsafe investment targets. One cannot overlook the risks that it poses: Investors could face massive losses if the TDR issuers were to run into problems such as embezzlement or poor management.
For example, lawmakers have alleged that the Wei (魏) family, major shareholders of the Ting Hsin Group, which includes Hong Kong-listed Tingyi (Cayman Islands) Holding Corp, had used more than half of the NT$17.1 billion (US$577 million) raised from issuing Tingyi TDRs to speculate on real estate. They have accused the family of using the proceeds to acquire a 37 percent stake in Taipei Financial Center Corp, the operator of Taipei 101, rather than to improve its core business operations. However, the FSC has said that based on its investigation, the investment was in line with the company’s plan to use part of the funds for investment in the property market, as stated in the company’s prospectus.
Lack of transparency is just the tip of iceberg amid a wave of TDR delistings after Want Want China Holdings announced in August that it was delisting on Oct. 15. The announcement sent a shock wave through the market, as the Hong Kong-listed food conglomerate’s TDR listing in 2009 was viewed as a milestone in Taiwan’s move to promote this trading platform. After Want Want’s withdrawal, Thai rubber manufacturer Hwa Fong Rubber (Thailand) Public Co also said it would delist its TDRs on Dec. 3.
Another two companies are likely to follow suit, as their turnover had fallen below 10 million units — the minimum threshold set by the Taiwan Stock Exchange — over the past three months. The delisting of these two companies will bring the number of TDR issuers down to 27 by the end of this year, from 36 when TDR issuance was at its peak. Over the past two years, not a single company had issued TDRs.
Clearly, the TDR trading platform has failed to give the stock market the boost that the government was expecting. Turnover on the main bourse has remained weak, reaching only NT$77 billion yesterday — far from a healthy level of NT$100 billion.
The FSC seems to have realized the shortcomings of TDRs and has turned its focus to encouraging companies to launch initial public offerings on the local stock market. It has also said it will step up its oversight on TDR companies.
Since TDRs are unable to bring the positive effect expected and have lost their appeal to local investors, the commission would do well to just get rid of this platform.
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
The past few months have seen tremendous strides in India’s journey to develop a vibrant semiconductor and electronics ecosystem. The nation’s established prowess in information technology (IT) has earned it much-needed revenue and prestige across the globe. Now, through the convergence of engineering talent, supportive government policies, an expanding market and technologically adaptive entrepreneurship, India is striving to become part of global electronics and semiconductor supply chains. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Vision of “Make in India” and “Design in India” has been the guiding force behind the government’s incentive schemes that span skilling, design, fabrication, assembly, testing and packaging, and
As former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) wrapped up his visit to the People’s Republic of China, he received his share of attention. Certainly, the trip must be seen within the full context of Ma’s life, that is, his eight-year presidency, the Sunflower movement and his failed Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement, as well as his eight years as Taipei mayor with its posturing, accusations of money laundering, and ups and downs. Through all that, basic questions stand out: “What drives Ma? What is his end game?” Having observed and commented on Ma for decades, it is all ironically reminiscent of former US president Harry