The 27-year-old journalist wore a green jail uniform, with his head shaved and hands in metal cuffs, when he appeared on national TV in China and confessed his guilt in bribery allegations, but he had yet to be charged with anything.
“I willingly admit my crime and I repent it,” Chen Yongzhou (陳永洲) said in footage aired by state broadcaster China Central Television (CCTV).
He said he took money while he was a reporter at a metropolitan newspaper in southern China in exchange for running several stories smearing a company that makes heavy machinery.
It was the latest of several high-profile, televised confessions, a new tactic by Chinese authorities attempting to scrub information they deem harmful, illegal or false from the public domain, especially from the Internet. The confessions have come alongside a propaganda campaign warning against relaying false information and new penalties for reposting untrue information in social media sites.
Critics warn that the government is trying to curb public speech and legal and journalism academics say the airing of confessions before court trials tramples on China’s rule of law.
“The street parades of yesterday have become television parades of today,” China University of Political Science and Law professor He Bing (何兵) lamented on his microblog.
He was alluding to China’s Cultural Revolution in the 1960s and 1970s, when mobs denounced and punished suspected wrongdoers without due process.
This time, police and state media appear to be working together. Police detain the suspect and get a confession. Then the interrogation video footage — mostly likely filmed by police — gets aired on the country’s most powerful state broadcaster before a court gets to hear the case and sometimes even before charges are filed, such as with Chen, who was charged four days after his televised confession.
The practice has been highly selective, with clear political overtones.
“I don’t think this has anything to do with the trials at all,” said Carl Minzner, a professor at Fordham Law School in New York. “Rather, these are experiments with using public confessions on state television — completely independently of any legal proceedings — [are] a mechanism to send political warnings to the rest of Chinese society.”
“The political movement has overtaken the law,” He said in a telephone interview.
Legal academics say evidence gathered during the police investigation should remain confidential by law until the probe is closed. They question on what grounds police have given CCTV access to suspects in detention or video footage of their interrogations. They ask what is behind CCTV’s decision to air the self-incriminating footage and some have raised the possibility of coerced confessions.
“To declare suspects guilty before court trials, CCTV has not only violated the professional code, but also China’s existing law,” said Chen Lidan (陳力丹), a journalism professor at Renmin University in Beijing.
In at least one case, the lawyer of a suspect said his client never accepted an interview with CCTV, but believed the police edited, compiled and shared the footage from the interrogations with the broadcaster.
“For the police to do that, it is completely illegal,” said Yang Mingkua (楊名跨), lawyer for environmentalist and popular microblogger Dong Rubin.