It was not all that long ago that the government guaranteed that its “three management and five checkpoint” measures for the importation of US beef would prevent problematic meat products from ending up on tables. So why is it that reports have come out of high-class restaurants serving steaks that contain the leanness-enhancing agent zilpaterol?
A few days ago, the Ministry of Health and Welfare guaranteed once again that it would strictly inspect beef imports, but can this really stop people from consuming beef with zilpaterol in it?
It is highly doubtful.
The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) allows US cattle breeders to add leanness-enhancing agents like ractopamine and zilpaterol, saying these two additives are low in toxicity and that as long as they do not exceed allowable standards, the beef produced will be safe. The FDA has also come up with maximum residue limits for ractopamine and zilpaterol of 10 parts per billion (ppb). The agency believes that consuming beef that contains 10ppb of the aforementioned leanness-enhancing agents will not affect public health.
From September last year to date this year, many shipments of US beef containing zilpaterol have been found by customs officials, as well as in stores and restaurants. While only between 0.3ppb and 0.4ppb of zilpaterol was found in these products, they were all sent back, or confiscated and destroyed. However, it is quite ironic to think that while this beef is safe according to FDA standards and people in the US, where food safety is given much more attention, can eat it, here in Taiwan, where food safety is laxer, people cannot eat it.
In September, South Korea imposed a total ban on the import of US beef after finding beef containing zilpaterol — an action that upset several well-known US meat suppliers. Video footage of cattle that could not walk properly and were falling over as a result of the additives was shown, and buyers say they refuse to purchase this type of beef. This caused a series of selling and price wars in the industry.
So what are the chances of zilpaterol-laced beef ending up here in Taiwan, where food safety checks are lax? It is little wonder that in recent months, local health authorities have found US beef containing zilpaterol in local restaurants.
It is said that as many as 70 percent of US cattle farms do not use leanness-enhancing agents and, as such, it should not be hard for Taiwan to import US beef that is free of such agents.
There are several well-known chain restaurants and meat suppliers in the US that claim that their products are natural and that they do not contain any additives like leanness-enhancing agents.
They charge high prices and they still have a strong customer base. So, why cannot Taiwanese officials demand US beef that is 100-percent free of leanness-enhancing agents during trade talks with the US.
US beef containing zilpaterol that has been seized has either been sent back or destroyed; this is not something US exporters can be too happy about. It is inevitable that the US Congress will apply pressure on the US government.
Sooner or later, US officials will demand that Taiwan reopen trade talks for the importation of beef and there is a high possibility that Taiwan will once again loosen controls because of political concerns.
Just like what happened with ractopamine, US beef containing zilpaterol will also flood Taiwanese shopping aisles and restaurants.
Liou Pei-pai is a former director of the Taiwan Animal Health Research Institute.
Translated by Drew Cameron
Saudi Arabian largesse is flooding Egypt’s cultural scene, but the reception is mixed. Some welcome new “cooperation” between two regional powerhouses, while others fear a hostile takeover by Riyadh. In Cairo, historically the cultural capital of the Arab world, Egyptian Minister of Culture Nevine al-Kilany recently hosted Saudi Arabian General Entertainment Authority chairman Turki al-Sheikh. The deep-pocketed al-Sheikh has emerged as a Medici-like patron for Egypt’s cultural elite, courted by Cairo’s top talent to produce a slew of forthcoming films. A new three-way agreement between al-Sheikh, Kilany and United Media Services — a multi-media conglomerate linked to state intelligence that owns much of
The US and other countries should take concrete steps to confront the threats from Beijing to avoid war, US Representative Mario Diaz-Balart said in an interview with Voice of America on March 13. The US should use “every diplomatic economic tool at our disposal to treat China as what it is... to avoid war,” Diaz-Balart said. Giving an example of what the US could do, he said that it has to be more aggressive in its military sales to Taiwan. Actions by cross-party US lawmakers in the past few years such as meeting with Taiwanese officials in Washington and Taipei, and
Denmark’s “one China” policy more and more resembles Beijing’s “one China” principle. At least, this is how things appear. In recent interactions with the Danish state, such as applying for residency permits, a Taiwanese’s nationality would be listed as “China.” That designation occurs for a Taiwanese student coming to Denmark or a Danish citizen arriving in Denmark with, for example, their Taiwanese partner. Details of this were published on Sunday in an article in the Danish daily Berlingske written by Alexander Sjoberg and Tobias Reinwald. The pretext for this new practice is that Denmark does not recognize Taiwan as a state under
The Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan has no official diplomatic allies in the EU. With the exception of the Vatican, it has no official allies in Europe at all. This does not prevent the ROC — Taiwan — from having close relations with EU member states and other European countries. The exact nature of the relationship does bear revisiting, if only to clarify what is a very complicated and sensitive idea, the details of which leave considerable room for misunderstanding, misrepresentation and disagreement. Only this week, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) received members of the European Parliament’s Delegation for Relations