According to reports in the media, President Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) parting comments to the delegation leaving for the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT)-Chinese Communist Party (CCP) forum was that observers think that the service trade agreement was negotiated behind closed doors when over the past year, there have been more than 100 meetings with 264 industry representatives from 46 different service industries, whether behind closed doors or at small discussions.
He was also reported as saying that “when talks are ongoing, it is impossible to announce [what is going on] because that would affect the end result. This is the case anywhere in the world; no one will announce the contents of talks before the talks are over; that is impossible.”
Ma’s “anywhere in the world” seems to differ from that of most other people. During the preparations for signing the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership between the US and the EU, European Commission trade officials have had to submit regular reports to the Council of Europe and the European Parliament, and they have to accept irregular supervision, inspection and instructions.
The future draft agreement must also be reviewed, amended, and approved or rejected by these institutions.
The same regulations apply on the US side.
Article 218 and paragraph 3 of article 207 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the EU clearly stipulates that, when it comes to talks and conclusions of international agreements, including the opening of negotiations, ongoing proceedings, the finalization, the signing of the draft, the signing of the final agreement, temporary application, suspension and termination: “The European Parliament shall be immediately and fully informed at all stages of the procedure.”
In Germany, the federal Law on Cooperation Between the Federal Government and the German Bundestag in Matters Concerning the EU stipulates that the German government is obligated to immediately answer and submit a report on free-trade agreement talks on the demand or wish of a member of the Bundestag.
The law also states that organizations with a right to obtaining information should include citizen’s groups and regular citizens in order to promote extensive public debate and concern.
Are the differences becoming clear yet?
Even if what Ma says were true and assuming that industry consultations are not unilateral and lacking binding force, the government deliberately avoids supervision by parliament and the public.
The lawyer C.V. Chen (陳長文) said that there is no need for negotiations and the signing to be transparent; so long as the results are transparent, everything is fine.
Yet the government was not even planning on accepting legislative oversight after the agreement was signed.
Georges Clemenceau, French prime minister during the final year of World War I, said that democracy is the art of self-control, and that if you do not control yourself, someone else will.
There is a Bulgarian saying that it is better to go to hell with a smart person than to go to heaven with an idiot.
The government is deliberately distorting democracy, self-righteously spreading false information and constantly walking with idiots. However, the nation is still not gaining entry into heaven.
The cross-strait service trade agreement is indeed a touchstone for Taiwanese democracy.
Lin Chia-ho is an assistant professor at National Chengchi University’s College of Law.
Translated by Perry Svensson
Saudi Arabian largesse is flooding Egypt’s cultural scene, but the reception is mixed. Some welcome new “cooperation” between two regional powerhouses, while others fear a hostile takeover by Riyadh. In Cairo, historically the cultural capital of the Arab world, Egyptian Minister of Culture Nevine al-Kilany recently hosted Saudi Arabian General Entertainment Authority chairman Turki al-Sheikh. The deep-pocketed al-Sheikh has emerged as a Medici-like patron for Egypt’s cultural elite, courted by Cairo’s top talent to produce a slew of forthcoming films. A new three-way agreement between al-Sheikh, Kilany and United Media Services — a multi-media conglomerate linked to state intelligence that owns much of
The US and other countries should take concrete steps to confront the threats from Beijing to avoid war, US Representative Mario Diaz-Balart said in an interview with Voice of America on March 13. The US should use “every diplomatic economic tool at our disposal to treat China as what it is... to avoid war,” Diaz-Balart said. Giving an example of what the US could do, he said that it has to be more aggressive in its military sales to Taiwan. Actions by cross-party US lawmakers in the past few years such as meeting with Taiwanese officials in Washington and Taipei, and
Denmark’s “one China” policy more and more resembles Beijing’s “one China” principle. At least, this is how things appear. In recent interactions with the Danish state, such as applying for residency permits, a Taiwanese’s nationality would be listed as “China.” That designation occurs for a Taiwanese student coming to Denmark or a Danish citizen arriving in Denmark with, for example, their Taiwanese partner. Details of this were published on Sunday in an article in the Danish daily Berlingske written by Alexander Sjoberg and Tobias Reinwald. The pretext for this new practice is that Denmark does not recognize Taiwan as a state under
The Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan has no official diplomatic allies in the EU. With the exception of the Vatican, it has no official allies in Europe at all. This does not prevent the ROC — Taiwan — from having close relations with EU member states and other European countries. The exact nature of the relationship does bear revisiting, if only to clarify what is a very complicated and sensitive idea, the details of which leave considerable room for misunderstanding, misrepresentation and disagreement. Only this week, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) received members of the European Parliament’s Delegation for Relations