More honest than Ma
Although he was stating the obvious, it was music to my ears to hear Minister of National Defense Yen Ming (嚴明) say that China is Taiwan’s enemy (“Taiwan-China ties remain adversarial: minister of defense,” Oct. 22, page 4).
President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) recently said that relations between China and Taiwans are not international relations. This statement was obviously well-received in China, where it likely made the Chinese Communist Party jump up and down with joy.
Through his efforts to placate China by making such a statement, Ma has insulted Taiwanese and in particular, the military.
Yen is stating the obvious when he says that China and Taiwan are adversaries, especially when one considers that China has 1,700 missiles aimed at Taiwan.
Thank you for speaking the truth, Minister Yen.
Dave Hall
Taipei
Service pact can hurt schools
The signing in June of the cross-strait service trade agreement in Shanghai will have a huge impact on the private language learning environment in Taiwan and across the Taiwan Strait in China. The pact, which is currently being stifled in the legislature by opposition groups, will certainly include the private language school sector.
The largest organizations in Taiwan will be able to benefit from economies of scale by expanding into China. The largest private language school in the nation already has a branch across the Strait. It will certainly be eager to gain access to the rest of the lucrative Chinese market, if the service pact is passed.
In addition to the service pact, a proposed amendment to the Supplementary Education Act (補習及教育進修法) is also being stifled in the legislature. The draft amendment is aimed at introducing stricter regulations on private language education for children in cram schools under the age of six.
An article appeared on the Taipei Times’ front page regarding this amendment and its proposed impact on private language learning in cram schools (“Stricter rules on language learning for kids proposed,” Aug. 30, page 1).
Will a free-trade agreement between Taiwan and China really benefit the whole private language sector in Taiwan, or will only the largest organizations survive? How can the smaller language schools benefit? Will they be able to survive in the tough business world where the larger organizations can benefit from economies of scale?
The service trade agreement will allow large amounts of Taiwanese capital to leave these shores. Taiwanese private language schools will be able to open many new branches in Chinese cities. The service pact does not stipulate where the company should declare its income, ie in Taiwan or China. So, which government would receive the schools’ corporate tax?
The service trade pact must be debated in the legislature by politicians and the input of economics professors must be considered. Close economic integration between China and Taiwan will inevitably lead to arguments over tax harmonization and therefore, closer political integration will be the next logical step.
Taiwan needs to look at the EU as a model. The bloc is currently experiencing a recession and countries within it that have higher taxation rates are undergoing tough austerity measures to try to balance their books. European politicians cannot agree on tax harmonization rates across the EU.
Greece is in a deep recession, but Germany is not. There is a free-trade agreement between these two countries, but this has not prevented Greece from exiting its recession. So will a free-trade agreement between Taiwan and China really improve the living standards of all Taiwanese?
In the EU, having free-trade agreements has not led to a better standard of living for all citizens of the member countries. Look at Greece, Portugal, Spain and Italy. They have high rates of unemployment and high levels of national debt. Does Taiwan want to go down the same path?
I urge Taiwanese politicians to carefully debate the pros and cons of entering any free-trade agreement with China. Any hasty cross-strait economic pact could have detrimental ramifications for the nation.
Paul Gilford
Taipei
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
Since the Russian invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, people have been asking if Taiwan is the next Ukraine. At a G7 meeting of national leaders in January, Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida warned that Taiwan “could be the next Ukraine” if Chinese aggression is not checked. NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg has said that if Russia is not defeated, then “today, it’s Ukraine, tomorrow it can be Taiwan.” China does not like this rhetoric. Its diplomats ask people to stop saying “Ukraine today, Taiwan tomorrow.” However, the rhetoric and stated ambition of Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) on Taiwan shows strong parallels with