A few days ago, the chairman of the Council for Economic Planning and Development admitted that the “golden cross” — defined as when GDP growth rises over 4 percent and the jobless rate drops below 4 percent — that was predicted in February will not happen.
It is unavoidable that economic forecasts will sometimes fail, but the deviation in this case is bordering on the absurd. Not three months after the grand proclaimation of an upcoming golden cross, the economic growth forecast was adjusted downward to 2.4 percent.
In August, it was further adjusted downward to 2.31 percent, and people are now beginning to worry that it will drop below 2 percent. The jobless rate, on the other hand, has not dropped; it rose to 4.33 percent in August, and youth unemployment now stands at 14.57 percent.
The problem is that this is not the first time this has happened. Last year, the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics made an equally optimistic economic growth forecast. That has since been adjusted downward nine times, from 4.5 percent to a paltry 1.05 percent. It is clear that the government’s economic estimates do not suffer from inaccuracy, but are rather deliberate attempts to deceive the public.
Its vicious ways can almost be compared to economic fraud, the only difference being that the goal of a fraudster is to make money, while the government’s economic scam is driven by deep ideological motivations and the goal of eventual unification with China.
These are the reasons the officials in charge of economic policy, who were so high-spirited at the start of the year, are hanging their heads dejectedly.
The blueprint for economic development, which is based on the ideology of eventual unification, requires integration with China, and its guiding principle is “deregulation.” After five years in government, the single policy guiding President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) and his administration is “opening up toward China.” When he talks about “moving outside of Taiwan,” what he really means is “moving over to China.” The result is that the capital, technology and talent that the nation has accumulated over 50 years of economic construction are being invested in China.
There is no way the government can know what the consequences of this will be — it is all based on ideology. The Ma administration is only evaluating the positive aspects and covers up anything negative, directing all its efforts toward making things look good in order to gain the public’s trust.
The big “6-3-3” campaign lie in 2008 was a product of this state of mind, as was the 2010 cross-strait Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement (ECFA). When the government is working hard for the economy, it is working hard on opening up. However, over the past five years, the harder it has worked, the worse the economy has become, the more incomes have dropped and the harder life has become.
As GDP has tumbled, China’s economy has been doing better, enabling it to put more power behind its attempts to besiege Taiwan. It is becoming obvious that when Ma and his government are working hard for the economy, they are in fact working hard for China.
The ECFA deceit helped Ma reap success in last year’s presidential election. This year, the government continued on the same track as it played up the “golden cross” pie in the sky at the start of the year, followed by the service trade agreement in June and the intimidating slogan “Taiwan can’t wait” to threaten the public and deceive the legislature into supporting it.
However, things change. Last year, the ECFA deceit still had not been exposed, but this year, the service trade agreement scam has met with disaster because of the ECFA calamity and the failure of the “golden cross” prediction.
This has been a major blow to the government, but for the general public the sharp decrease in economic growth and the rise in unemployment, while painful, may be blessings in disguise if they help people recognize these scams, block the service trade agreement from being passed and allow the economy to return to the proper path to internationalization.
Huang Tien-lin is a former national policy adviser.
Translated by Perry Svensson
Could Asia be on the verge of a new wave of nuclear proliferation? A look back at the early history of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), which recently celebrated its 75th anniversary, illuminates some reasons for concern in the Indo-Pacific today. US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin recently described NATO as “the most powerful and successful alliance in history,” but the organization’s early years were not without challenges. At its inception, the signing of the North Atlantic Treaty marked a sea change in American strategic thinking. The United States had been intent on withdrawing from Europe in the years following
My wife and I spent the week in the interior of Taiwan where Shuyuan spent her childhood. In that town there is a street that functions as an open farmer’s market. Walk along that street, as Shuyuan did yesterday, and it is next to impossible to come home empty-handed. Some mangoes that looked vaguely like others we had seen around here ended up on our table. Shuyuan told how she had bought them from a little old farmer woman from the countryside who said the mangoes were from a very old tree she had on her property. The big surprise
The issue of China’s overcapacity has drawn greater global attention recently, with US Secretary of the Treasury Janet Yellen urging Beijing to address its excess production in key industries during her visit to China last week. Meanwhile in Brussels, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen last week said that Europe must have a tough talk with China on its perceived overcapacity and unfair trade practices. The remarks by Yellen and Von der Leyen come as China’s economy is undergoing a painful transition. Beijing is trying to steer the world’s second-largest economy out of a COVID-19 slump, the property crisis and
Former president Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) trip to China provides a pertinent reminder of why Taiwanese protested so vociferously against attempts to force through the cross-strait service trade agreement in 2014 and why, since Ma’s presidential election win in 2012, they have not voted in another Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) candidate. While the nation narrowly avoided tragedy — the treaty would have put Taiwan on the path toward the demobilization of its democracy, which Courtney Donovan Smith wrote about in the Taipei Times in “With the Sunflower movement Taiwan dodged a bullet” — Ma’s political swansong in China, which included fawning dithyrambs