The turmoil following the Arab Awakening has all but decimated the affected countries’ economies. Political assassinations and polarization in Tunisia, civil unrest and a military takeover in Egypt, terrorist attacks in Yemen, sectarian strife and an institutional vacuum in Libya and civil war in Syria have contributed to a sharp fall in investment, tourism, exports and GDP growth, aggravating macroeconomic imbalances. For example, Egypt’s fiscal deficit now stands at 14 percent of GDP, with public debt approaching 100 percent of GDP. Most of the Arab Awakening countries lack buffers to withstand further economic shocks.
Worse, beyond the removal of individual autocratic leaders, few of the problems that fueled the uprisings have been addressed. Indeed, unemployment is higher today than in 2010. Untargeted fuel subsidies and the public-sector wage bill have increased, crowding out much-needed public investment and relief to poor families, while impeding the development of a dynamic and competitive private sector, and limiting new firms’ access to finance. Meanwhile, public-service delivery has deteriorated.
Moreover, the political situation remains unsettled, with transitional or interim governments, unfinished constitutions and uncertain timetables for future elections. In short, the Arab world’s transition countries are much more vulnerable today than they were at the height of the protests in 2011.
Against this background, an external shock could bring these fragile economies to a sudden stop, leading to devastating poverty and hardship, and imbalance-correcting policies – such as sharp tax increases, spending cuts, or currency devaluation — could backfire, fueling political unrest, delaying elections further and exacerbating the very imbalances that they were meant to rectify.
Even if governments managed to restore macroeconomic balance gradually, the structural problems of high unemployment, poor investment climates and inadequate provision of public services would likely remain unaddressed.
Growth would be insufficient to create jobs for the millions of young people entering the labor market. The Arab Awakening could become little more than a blip in the affected countries’ socioeconomic development.
Until now, the international community’s response has been piecemeal at best. In 2011, the G8 Deauville Partnership — which brought the European Bank for Reconstruction and Development (EBRD) to the region — pledged that international financial institutions (IFIs) would provide US$38 billion to the transition countries over three years.
However, that promise was based more on existing IFI pipelines than on transition countries’ emerging needs. Furthermore, poor macroeconomic fundamentals, slow progress on reform and political turmoil have constrained the use of these resources. From the transition countries’ perspective, bilateral support from the G8 and the EU has been disappointing.
The Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) countries — especially Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates, Qatar and Kuwait — have contributed roughly US$28 billion to the transition countries. While these resources have helped to finance budget shortfalls, stabilize reserves and calm nervous markets, they have not been sufficiently leveraged to improve the policy framework, strengthen implementation of public investment projects or, more generally, put the transition countries on an inclusive and sustainable growth path.
To give the Arab Awakening countries the needed space to transform their economies alongside their political systems, while avoiding destabilization or collapse, the international community must scale up financial, policy and institutional assistance. This should include new financial assistance linked to long-term reforms, amounting to US$30 billion to US$40 billion annually for about three years; technical support to ensure that these funds are channeled toward productive public investment in short-term public-works programs that create jobs and longer-term infrastructure projects that ease supply bottlenecks; broad frameworks for trade, regulatory reform and investment provided by, for example, deep and comprehensive free-trade agreements with the EU; policy and institutional support to restore trust between governments and their citizens, including by eliminating red tape and nepotism in business transactions, enabling poor people to hold public-
service providers accountable and enhancing social protection for the most vulnerable citizens.
This combination of assistance plays to the strengths of bilateral and multilateral partners like the GCC, the EU, and the US, as well as IFIs like the World Bank, the IMF, the EBRD, the African Development Bank, the Islamic Development Bank and Arab development funds.
These players complement each other in terms of systemic knowledge, implementation capacity and available financial resources.
The upcoming gathering of finance ministers in Washington for the World Bank-IMF Annual Meetings is an ideal opportunity to begin building consensus around this much-needed effort. Without urgent action, there is a good chance that those who took to the streets — indeed, risked their lives — in the struggle for dignity and opportunity will have done so in vain.
Erik Berglof is chief economist at the European Bank for Reconstruction and Development. Shanta Devarajan is the World Bank’s chief economist for the Middle East and North Africa.
Copyright: Project Syndicate
Could Asia be on the verge of a new wave of nuclear proliferation? A look back at the early history of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), which recently celebrated its 75th anniversary, illuminates some reasons for concern in the Indo-Pacific today. US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin recently described NATO as “the most powerful and successful alliance in history,” but the organization’s early years were not without challenges. At its inception, the signing of the North Atlantic Treaty marked a sea change in American strategic thinking. The United States had been intent on withdrawing from Europe in the years following
My wife and I spent the week in the interior of Taiwan where Shuyuan spent her childhood. In that town there is a street that functions as an open farmer’s market. Walk along that street, as Shuyuan did yesterday, and it is next to impossible to come home empty-handed. Some mangoes that looked vaguely like others we had seen around here ended up on our table. Shuyuan told how she had bought them from a little old farmer woman from the countryside who said the mangoes were from a very old tree she had on her property. The big surprise
The issue of China’s overcapacity has drawn greater global attention recently, with US Secretary of the Treasury Janet Yellen urging Beijing to address its excess production in key industries during her visit to China last week. Meanwhile in Brussels, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen last week said that Europe must have a tough talk with China on its perceived overcapacity and unfair trade practices. The remarks by Yellen and Von der Leyen come as China’s economy is undergoing a painful transition. Beijing is trying to steer the world’s second-largest economy out of a COVID-19 slump, the property crisis and
As former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) wrapped up his visit to the People’s Republic of China, he received his share of attention. Certainly, the trip must be seen within the full context of Ma’s life, that is, his eight-year presidency, the Sunflower movement and his failed Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement, as well as his eight years as Taipei mayor with its posturing, accusations of money laundering, and ups and downs. Through all that, basic questions stand out: “What drives Ma? What is his end game?” Having observed and commented on Ma for decades, it is all ironically reminiscent of former US president Harry