The Japan-US alliance announced its new direction, “Toward a More Robust Alliance and Greater Shared Responsibilities,” on Oct. 3, following the Security Consultative Committee (2+2) meeting. The primary task is to make changes to the Guidelines for Japan-US Defense Cooperation by the end of next year, amending the guidelines for the first time since 1997. From the conclusion of the meeting, significant changes are to be expected in Japan’s security policy in the near future, and Taiwan must be prepared for these changes.
There were five key issues at the meeting this time: new guidelines for defense cooperation, enhancement of Japan’s ballistic missile defense (BMD) capabilities, bilateral and multilateral regional military cooperation, realignment of the US military base in Okinawa and deployment of new weapons.
The guidelines for defense cooperation were initiated in 1978 as a direct result of increasing tensions in the Cold War. At that time, the situation in Iran was precarious, and the Soviet Union was about to invade Afghanistan. The US responded by accelerating the normalization of diplomatic relations with China on the one hand and strengthening military cooperation with Japan on the other. The guidelines were proposed based on Japan’s “purely defensive defense,” confirming the tactic of the US being the “spear” to Japan’s “shield.”
The Japan-US alliance amended the guidelines for defense cooperation again in 1997 to adapt itself to the post-Cold War era. In the face of the disappearance of the Soviet threat and the appearance of the nuclear crisis in North Korea and the crisis in the Taiwan Strait, the US and Japan reconfirmed the importance of the alliance.
During this period, the focus was on expanding the influence of the Japan-US alliance. Japan had even changed its long-term principle of “purely defensive defense.” The Japan-US Security Treaty highlighted Article 6 regarding “the maintenance of international peace and security in the Far East,” instead of Article 5 regarding armed attacks against either party. Based on this, the Japanese government later passed the Law Concerning Measures to Ensure the Peace and Security of Japan in Situations in Areas Surrounding Japan in 1999.
After the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks in the US, Japan used the “war on terror” as an opportunity to further expand its influence in the alliance. Consequently, the alliance made a joint statement on globalization at the 2005 Security Consultative Committee meeting.
Since Japan expects to complete the amendments to the National Defense Program Guidelines by the end of the year, and is set to hold a Japan-US summit in the first half of next year, the alliance is likely to launch the new guidelines for defense cooperation at the summit. And this time, the content of the 2+2 meeting shows that Japanese Prime Minister Shinzo Abe’s administration might push for the constitutionality of Japan’s “right of collective self-defense” through a reinterpretation of its constitution and new guidelines.
By doing so, Japan will largely reduce restrictions on security and defense affairs and increase the chance for military cooperation with neighboring states. Meanwhile, it will adopt a more proactive attitude in terms of “deterrence capability” and “proactive defense,” and may even change its “rules of engagement” for military offenses. Taiwan must keep abreast of these changes and adjust its national security policy accordingly. After all, consolidating its relationship with the Japan-US alliance is considered the absolute principle for the nation’s strategy with other countries.
Lai I-chung is vice president of Taiwan Thinktank.
Translated by Eddy Chang
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
The past few months have seen tremendous strides in India’s journey to develop a vibrant semiconductor and electronics ecosystem. The nation’s established prowess in information technology (IT) has earned it much-needed revenue and prestige across the globe. Now, through the convergence of engineering talent, supportive government policies, an expanding market and technologically adaptive entrepreneurship, India is striving to become part of global electronics and semiconductor supply chains. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Vision of “Make in India” and “Design in India” has been the guiding force behind the government’s incentive schemes that span skilling, design, fabrication, assembly, testing and packaging, and
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.