"I think I can take [US] President [Barack] Obama one-on-one in basketball,” newly elected Bhutanese Prime Minister Tshering Tobgay said in an interview. “I’ve got some special moves.”
The prime minister is 10cm shorter than Barack Obama, so beating the US president in hoops might be a stretch. However, after his surprise election this summer, almost no one in South Asia doubts that he has special moves and he is renowned for his grit.
Four years ago while competing in the first Tour of the Dragon, billed as the most difficult one-day mountain bike race in the world, he fell and broke his jaw after riding 68km. In searing pain, he got up and rode the rest of the race — 200 more kilometers.
Tobgay, 48, was one of just two opposition members chosen by voters in Bhutan’s first parliamentary elections in 2008 and few gave him better than even odds at toppling the governing Bhutan Peace and Prosperity Party in the country’s second set of national elections in July.
Several factors went his way, including a currency crisis last year and threats from India just before the vote to withdraw vital financial support. However, many analysts credit Tobgay with running an unusually disciplined campaign that included a long manifesto of specific promises. His People’s Democratic Party won 32 of 47 seats, a resounding victory.
The son of a soldier, Tobgay was sent to boarding school near Darjeeling, India, when he was five. After graduating from high school, he won a government scholarship to attend the University of Pittsburgh where he earned a degree in mechanical engineering. In 1991, he became a civil servant in Bhutan’s education department, but left government service in 2007 to dive into politics. He is married and has two children.
Now, he is overseeing a country of 725,000 people in the midst of one of the most thorough transformations in the world. Bhutan’s feudal system continued until 1953 and its first road was built in 1962.
“In the last few years, we have transformed beyond recognition — politically, economically and socially,” Tobgay said.
He has largely abandoned the country’s signature gross national happiness measure, its alternative to gross national product. Introduced in 1972 by Bhutanese King Jigme Singye Wangchuck, gross national happiness was seen as a way of balancing the country’s gradual embrace of modernity with an effort to preserve its traditions.
Tobgay’s predecessor, former Bhutanese prime minister Jigme Thinley, had traveled the world promoting the happiness measure, making him a popular figure among Western academics and literati, but less so among his countrymen.
Tobgay’s catalog of modest promises during the election campaign included a motorized rototiller for every village and a utility vehicle for each district. Happiness was not on his list.
“Rather than talking about happiness, we want to work on reducing the obstacles to happiness,” he said.
Those obstacles remain substantial, including a growing national debt and high unemployment. Bhutan’s infrastructure, still woefully inadequate, has been built almost entirely by Indian companies and laborers. At first, Bhutan relied on Indians because few Bhutanese possessed the necessary skills. Now, a more educated and urbanized younger generation is refusing construction work as beneath it.
“The bottom line is that we have to work harder,” Tobgay said. “We need to grow our own food, build our own homes.”
He lamented that so many of Bhutan’s youth were voluntarily unemployed.
“If we can restructure the construction sector to make it more attractive, that should provide a lot of jobs,” he said.
The country’s major industries are hydroelectric power, which it exports to India, and tourism. While most of the population is still involved in subsistence farming, a growing number of people are abandoning their traditional single-family mud-and-wood homes in isolated villages and moving to the country’s towns and cities.
“Who wants to do subsistence farming and get up at four in the morning and carry water if you don’t have to?” asked Paljor Dorji, a member of the royal family and a longtime close adviser to the former king. “Once you educate the people, nobody is going to live the same miserable life their parents did.”
Between 2005 and last year, more than 1,300 apartment buildings were built in Bhutan’s capital, Thimphu, and they now house nearly two-thirds of the city’s 116,000 residents.
Unlike most cities in South Asia, Thimphu is being developed within strict guidelines, which include adequate roads, sewers and schools. The city requires every building to incorporate elements from traditional Bhutanese architecture like pitched roofs, distinctive windows and upper-story projections, making the town feel like a downscale Vail, Colorado.
Thimphu is a pleasant walking city, with none of the chaotic warrens present in many Indian cities. Its people are cheerful, its merchants show none of the pushiness common in South Asia and even its stray dogs seem benign. There are no slums.
Tobgay has eliminated some of the restrictive customs enforced by the previous government, including occasional bans on vehicular traffic and a dress code requiring men to wear **ghos**, a dress-like, traditional garment. He acknowledged that preserving the country’s traditional culture would be challenging in an era of rapid urbanization.
Bhutan’s royal family is revered and criticism of royalty remains unthinkable. However, there is a lively national news media and the country’s many and growing democratic and educational institutions have made Bhutan the darling of development and nongovernmental funding organizations.
“Bhutan is an exceptional success story,” said Sekhar Bonu of the Asian Development Bank. “It’s a ray of hope in South Asia and it sets a new benchmark when we talk to other countries.”
Tobgay said one of his top priorities was to crack down on growing political corruption. The previous government was considering measures that would have weakened the country’s anti-corruption agency, but Tobgay, who has shunned his predecessor’s limousine and luxury accommodations, said that he planned to strengthen it.
“If corruption creeps in and takes root, we have had it,” Tobgay said. “We need to ensure that rule of law prevails.”
He plans to host a weekly call-in radio program, hold monthly news conferences and have public office hours when anyone can come and complain. He has a blog and a Twitter account and is active on Facebook.
“Friend me,” he said with a mischievous smile.
Thinley lobbied for a nonpermanent seat on the UN Security Council, opened new embassies and held discussions with China; efforts that alarmed India. Tobgay has promised to end much of that international outreach.
“Opening embassies is expensive,” he said. “We have to understand how poor we are.”
He expressed a clear preference for India, which gives Bhutan considerable financial assistance, over China.
“The friendship between India and Bhutan transcends party politics and personalities,” he said with some warmth.
When asked about the country’s other neighbor, his face fell. “We engage with China. That is a reality.”
While he intends to spend little time on international affairs, he said he would make an exception to play basketball with Obama.
“I need to practice my 3-pointers, sharpen my elbows and strengthen my shoulders,” he said with a clear understanding of foreign diplomacy. “You’re a superpower, so my only chance is going one on one.”
Saudi Arabian largesse is flooding Egypt’s cultural scene, but the reception is mixed. Some welcome new “cooperation” between two regional powerhouses, while others fear a hostile takeover by Riyadh. In Cairo, historically the cultural capital of the Arab world, Egyptian Minister of Culture Nevine al-Kilany recently hosted Saudi Arabian General Entertainment Authority chairman Turki al-Sheikh. The deep-pocketed al-Sheikh has emerged as a Medici-like patron for Egypt’s cultural elite, courted by Cairo’s top talent to produce a slew of forthcoming films. A new three-way agreement between al-Sheikh, Kilany and United Media Services — a multi-media conglomerate linked to state intelligence that owns much of
The US and other countries should take concrete steps to confront the threats from Beijing to avoid war, US Representative Mario Diaz-Balart said in an interview with Voice of America on March 13. The US should use “every diplomatic economic tool at our disposal to treat China as what it is... to avoid war,” Diaz-Balart said. Giving an example of what the US could do, he said that it has to be more aggressive in its military sales to Taiwan. Actions by cross-party US lawmakers in the past few years such as meeting with Taiwanese officials in Washington and Taipei, and
The Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan has no official diplomatic allies in the EU. With the exception of the Vatican, it has no official allies in Europe at all. This does not prevent the ROC — Taiwan — from having close relations with EU member states and other European countries. The exact nature of the relationship does bear revisiting, if only to clarify what is a very complicated and sensitive idea, the details of which leave considerable room for misunderstanding, misrepresentation and disagreement. Only this week, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) received members of the European Parliament’s Delegation for Relations
Denmark’s “one China” policy more and more resembles Beijing’s “one China” principle. At least, this is how things appear. In recent interactions with the Danish state, such as applying for residency permits, a Taiwanese’s nationality would be listed as “China.” That designation occurs for a Taiwanese student coming to Denmark or a Danish citizen arriving in Denmark with, for example, their Taiwanese partner. Details of this were published on Sunday in an article in the Danish daily Berlingske written by Alexander Sjoberg and Tobias Reinwald. The pretext for this new practice is that Denmark does not recognize Taiwan as a state under