The government decided to participate in this year’s International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO) assembly, a move it believes will be positive and significant. There is no doubting the Ministry of Foreign Affairs’ commitment to this, but closer analysis reveals that participating in this event is actually a defeat for Taiwan and perhaps the beginning of the deterioration in its diplomatic situation.
When compared with the World Health Assembly (WHA) model, participation in the ICAO assembly entails a serious reduction in Taiwan’s status as a nation and its interests. The Taiwanese delegation is attending the summit as “special guests” — one notch down from being an observer nation — and is seated behind the observer nations. Worse, the delegation will not be there under the name of “Chinese Taipei,” but as “Guest, Chinese Taipei.” Without observer status, we will have to just be seen and not heard, with no legal right to make any proposals.
The ICAO chairman has said that all of this was Beijing’s suggestion. China has its position and is extremely unlikely at this stage to agree to any participation on Taiwan’s part that could be construed as being founded on the principle of “one China, one Taiwan” or even “two Chinas.”
Nevertheless, looking at the list of delegates at the previous ICAO assembly, there were 40 attendees present as “observer delegations” — including the Palestinian Authority and a range of international organizations — in addition to those there as observer nations. If Taiwan were allowed to participate as an observer delegation, this would not — in purely legal terms — have any implications for statehood and would thereby not entail either “one China, one Taiwan” nor “two Chinas.” Despite this, Beijing has regrettably refused to concede an inch on this matter.
Given this, the government was needlessly hasty in agreeing to attend this year’s assembly. Taiwan has not participated in an ICAO event for more than 40 years and this has had little effect on flight safety. At this stage, there is no pressure on Taiwan to participate in the assembly. More importantly, due to diplomatic efforts, the US, the EU and Canada — the host nation — have all voiced their support of Taiwan’s participation in the aviation organization as an observer member.
These major players’ opinions on the matter makes it likely that China is feeling a certain amount of pressure from them. Strategically speaking, with the WHA precedent in place, there is hope that Taiwan could participate as an observer member at the next ICAO event, even if it cannot do so this time. However, the government instead agreed to accept the more lowly “special guest” status in its haste to achieve its goal of attending the meeting, whatever the cost. This will not only affect Taiwan’s participation in the ICAO assembly, it could also have repercussions for attendance in other organizations.
If Beijing continues to object to Taipei’s bids to participate in international organizations, then other members of the international community will be content to accept China’s position, putting Taiwan at serious risk of losing the little flexibility it has in this regard.
Beijing is haggling over the most minute details and refusing to budge an inch on anything when it comes to Taiwan’s international presence, in the erroneous belief that improving cross-strait relations will change Taiwan’s ambition to have more room to maneuver internationally. It is true that the government ought to look at the overall diplomatic situation, but rushing into things to secure one-off success will adversely affect the nation’s diplomatic status in the long run.
Chiang Huang-chih is a professor of law at National Taiwan University.
Translated by Paul Cooper
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
The past few months have seen tremendous strides in India’s journey to develop a vibrant semiconductor and electronics ecosystem. The nation’s established prowess in information technology (IT) has earned it much-needed revenue and prestige across the globe. Now, through the convergence of engineering talent, supportive government policies, an expanding market and technologically adaptive entrepreneurship, India is striving to become part of global electronics and semiconductor supply chains. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Vision of “Make in India” and “Design in India” has been the guiding force behind the government’s incentive schemes that span skilling, design, fabrication, assembly, testing and packaging, and
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.