Save Linkou Forest
The Taipei City Government bid to host the 2017 Taipei Universiade. At first, the news that the city would host the event was received with delight. However, the city decided to build the Universiade village on the grounds of the forest in Linkou District (林口), New Taipei City (新北市), without considering the impact on the environment. The forest covers more than 13 hectares, equal to 1more than 3 soccer fields, and it is heart-wrenching to witness its destruction.
We welcome the best athletes from great universities around the world to come to Taiwan to compete. However, we also hope they can enjoy the nation’s natural beauty.
“Linkou Forest” is home to more than 1,300 trees, many more than 40 years old. Besides this, many birds and tropical insects make the park their home. Linkou Forest is the last piece of nature in the district. Once it is destroyed, the natural ecosystem will be ruined and the soil and water of the surrounding mountains may be harmed.
Another concern is that the buildings will be constructed above “the warning slope for mud slides.” Residents near the site can now see small mudslides. The Taipei City Government lies when it says the warning slope is far from the buildings and will not worsen mudslides in the district. The construction of the village will surely increase the occurrences of major mud slides, especially in the summer and during typhoon season. Please help fight the construction of the Universiade village and oppose the plans of the Taipei City Government.
People who love and want to protect the environment should work together to convince the host organization to choose another place to build the Universiade village and reduce the construction area. Do not destroy Linkou Forest forever for a 12-day Universiade. Let the next generation enjoy the forest ecosystem, a healthy city and a low-carbon future.
Nipa Wu
New Taipei City
Rethinking the Bogar goals
Since the creation of the APEC forum in 1989, the most significant achievement of APEC has been the creation of the “Bogor goals,” which were announced at the 1994 APEC Economic Leaders’ Meeting in Bogor, Indonesia. Essentially, the Bogor goals aimed at achieving free and open trade and investment by 2010 for developed economies and 2020 by developing economies. In 2010, APEC concluded that progress had been made, but many challenges remained in the areas of trade and investment liberalization. Therefore, APEC economies will now strive to achieve free trade by 2020.
As Indonesia is this year’s APEC host, it is fitting that one of the three APEC priorities for this year is “attaining the Bogor goals.” The other two priorities are “achieving sustainable growth with equity” and “promoting connectivity.” It is not surprising that Indonesia is focused on advancing the achievement of the Bogor goals, since Indonesia has played a major role in bringing them about.
Most importantly, the promotion of free trade and investment is strongly linked to the attainment of sustainable growth in an equitable manner. This means that the implementation of policies relating to trade and investment liberalization must support sustainable growth and result in benefits that are shared equally by all people. In addition, the vastness of the Asia-Pacific region means that APEC must seek ways to ensure greater connectivity among its members. Thus, Indonesia has not only developed three interrelated priorities of importance to itself, but also to the APEC community.
“Chinese Taipei,” as Taiwan is called in APEC, can play a major role in APEC. Taiwan’s APEC lead representative, former vice president Vincent Siew (蕭萬長), served in the same capacity in 1994, when the Bogor goals were created. Only one other 1994 APEC economy representative will also attend this year’s meeting, Sultan Hassanal Bolkiah of Brunei Darussalam.
Siew could call on APEC leaders to clarify the meaning of free trade, the main point found in the Bogor goals. The achievement of free trade could mean zero tariffs or other levels in quantitative terms. However, it is suggested that the Bogor goals are defined to mean the promotion of freer trade. This means that APEC will have achieved the Bogor goals when every APEC member has made progress through individual actions, as well as through collective actions.
Furthermore, the spirit of free trade embodied in the Bogor goals entails that APEC members should also ensure that regional undertakings, such as the Trans-Pacific Partnership and the Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership, are open to membership from APEC members. Ultimately, when 2020 arrives, APEC could state that the trade and investment environment in the Asia-Pacific region has become freer and the Bogor goals have been achieved.
Ho Chen-sheng
Taipei
Could Asia be on the verge of a new wave of nuclear proliferation? A look back at the early history of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), which recently celebrated its 75th anniversary, illuminates some reasons for concern in the Indo-Pacific today. US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin recently described NATO as “the most powerful and successful alliance in history,” but the organization’s early years were not without challenges. At its inception, the signing of the North Atlantic Treaty marked a sea change in American strategic thinking. The United States had been intent on withdrawing from Europe in the years following
My wife and I spent the week in the interior of Taiwan where Shuyuan spent her childhood. In that town there is a street that functions as an open farmer’s market. Walk along that street, as Shuyuan did yesterday, and it is next to impossible to come home empty-handed. Some mangoes that looked vaguely like others we had seen around here ended up on our table. Shuyuan told how she had bought them from a little old farmer woman from the countryside who said the mangoes were from a very old tree she had on her property. The big surprise
The issue of China’s overcapacity has drawn greater global attention recently, with US Secretary of the Treasury Janet Yellen urging Beijing to address its excess production in key industries during her visit to China last week. Meanwhile in Brussels, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen last week said that Europe must have a tough talk with China on its perceived overcapacity and unfair trade practices. The remarks by Yellen and Von der Leyen come as China’s economy is undergoing a painful transition. Beijing is trying to steer the world’s second-largest economy out of a COVID-19 slump, the property crisis and
Former president Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) trip to China provides a pertinent reminder of why Taiwanese protested so vociferously against attempts to force through the cross-strait service trade agreement in 2014 and why, since Ma’s presidential election win in 2012, they have not voted in another Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) candidate. While the nation narrowly avoided tragedy — the treaty would have put Taiwan on the path toward the demobilization of its democracy, which Courtney Donovan Smith wrote about in the Taipei Times in “With the Sunflower movement Taiwan dodged a bullet” — Ma’s political swansong in China, which included fawning dithyrambs