Let Taiwanese be happy
If Taiwanese are happy, leave them alone and let them be happy (“Happy index not a true reflection,” Sept. 2, page 8).
It does not seem possible, economically or politically, that Taiwanese are happier than Japanese and South Koreans. One thing for sure, and pertinent, is that Taiwanese are happier than Chinese.
A good, smart government always tries its best to make its people happy. Unfortunately, President Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) administration has done many things against the public’s will.
Here are some examples: The so-called “one China” policy is trying to convert Taiwanese into Chinese; the service trade agreement with China will allow Chinese to take over local jobs; the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) has many illegal party assets to fund elections; corruption cases are treated differently according to political affiliation; the government acts like an enemy, infringing on property and human rights; the electromagnetic wave irradiation of farmlands is a health hazard for farmers; and finally, Ma seldom keeps his campaign promises and has failed to make Taiwan a “normal” country.
Fighting for citizenship
Article 15 (1) of the Universal Human Rights Declaration says everyone has the right to a nationality. What is the nationality of people from Taiwan?
A Taiwanese student at Oslo University, Lu Yu-ta (呂昱達), ached at being registered as a citizen of the People’s Republic of China. His complaints were ignored by the Norwegian police and immigration authorities.
Lu became frustrated and said: “Although we are granted visa-free access to 140 countries, it is sad that we must suffer through not being recognized as citizens of an independent country.”
Lu has issued a wake-up call for all Taiwanese to face their citizenship.
Citizenship awareness is closely tied to the nation’s future. What does the younger generation dream of? Everyone, like Lu, dreams of being a citizen of a nation called Taiwan with the pride of UN membership. Unfortunately, people have been under the KMT’s brainwashing program for 68 years, which says the Republic of China (ROC) is an independent sovereign state and Taiwan is a province of its territory. The reality is that the ROC is not an independent country, but an exiled government without international recognition.
In the e-generation, people can easily verify historical records. There is no international treaty or legal document declaring that sovereignty over Taiwan has been transferred from Japan to the ROC. President Ma said Chiang Kai-shek (蔣介石) did ask for Taiwan’s sovereignty in the Cairo declaration and under the Taipei treaty, Japan transfered Taiwan sovereignty to the ROC in 1952.
However, the Cairo declaration was only a news release. Japan renounced all rights, titles and claims to Formosa and the Pescadores on Sept. 8, 1951 in the San Francisco Peace Treaty.
The US military government was named as the principal occupying power. There was no resolution passed by the ROC’s National Assembly or the Legislative Yuan to record Taiwan as annexed territory. There is no proof that the ROC has sovereignty over Taiwan. It is no wonder the international community refer to the ROC as Chinese Taipei; the Chinese exiled government in Taipei.
Why is the nation referred to as Chinese Taipei and not Formosa or Taiwan? That is the puzzle the younger generation needs to solve. They have been educated as Chinese, but the real world tells them they are Formosan.
Sixty-two years ago, on Sept. 5, 1951, three days before the signing of the San Francisco treaty, then-US secretary of state John Foster Dulles said “the foundation for this peace was laid by the many who gave up their lives in faith that the very magnitude of their sacrifice would compel those who survived to find and take the way to peace.”
World War II is over everywhere except in Taiwan. Taiwanese are entitled to self-determination. Hopefully, activist group Citizen 1985 will continue to declare “injustice,” “anger” and “we want truth” to help Lu fight for his nationality claim and to finally define Taiwan’s status.
French firm DCI-DESCO in April won a bid to upgrade Taiwan’s Lafayette frigates, which has strained ties between China and France. In 1991, France sold Taiwan six Lafayette frigates and in 1992 sold it 60 Mirage 2000 fighter jets. To prevent arms sales between the nations, China negotiated an agreement with France and in 1994 in a joint statement, France promised that there would be no future arms sales to Taiwan. From China’s point of view, the DCI-DESCO deal constitutes a breach of the agreement, but the French stance is that it is not selling Taiwan new weapons, but instead providing a
Chung Yuan ChristiaN University is clearly in bed with the People’s Republic of China. This can be the only explanation why the school’s authorities have done their utmost to shield a student, who lodged a complaint against an associate professor, and then used thuggish tactics to compel the teacher to issue two separate apologies to China. The original complaint, filed by an unnamed Chinese student, was for remarks by associate professor Chao Ming-wei (招名威) during a class on the origin of COVID-19. A second complaint was filed by the same student after Chao, during an apology, stated that he was a
President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) in her inaugural address on May 20 firmly said: “We will not accept the Beijing authorities’ use of ‘one country, two systems’ to downgrade Taiwan and undermine the cross-strait status quo.” The Chinese government was not too happy, and later that day, an opinion piece on the Web site of China’s state broadcaster China Central Television said: “While Tsai’s first inaugural address four years ago was read by Beijing as an ‘unfinished answer sheet,’ the one she presented this time was even more below-par.” Speaking to the China Review News Agency, Shanghai Institutes for International Studies vice president
The COVID-19 pandemic continues to wreak havoc worldwide. Despite countries being under pressure economically and from the novel coronavirus, China’s National People’s Congress last month passed national security legislation for Hong Kong, a decision that has shocked the world. Let there be no doubt: This move is the beginning of the end of China’s plans for “one country, two systems” in Hong Kong and Taiwan. Proposed amendments to extradition laws last year ignited massive protests in Hong Kong, with millions of participants, shocking the world and making confrontation between government forces and those who opposed the change a permanent part of Hong