Control Yuan out of control
There have always been questions about the need for a Control Yuan and an Examination Yuan.
The Control Yuan has been in the spotlight due to its failure to impeach Keelung Mayor Chang Tong-rong (張通榮). Not only have the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) and the Taiwan Solidarity Union called for the Control Yuan to be abolished, its own president, Wang Chien-shien (王建煊), has also said that perhaps the nation is better off without it.
The functions of Control Yuan are not only ill defined, they also overlap with those of other government institutions in the executive, legislative and judicial branches. What is even worse is that positions in these branches are considered by some as a way to provide political favors.
If the opposition parties are serious about taking up the cause of abolishing the Control Yuan, they need to be more consistent in their stances toward it. For example, when the Control Yuan tried to impeach National Taiwan University Hospital physician Ko Wen-je (柯文哲) last year following an incident in which five HIV-infected organs were accidentally transplanted, many in the pan-green camp attacked it for overstepping its mandate and threatened to have it shut down.
Conversely, earlier this year, when a Control Yuan member’s investigation concluded that imprisoned former president Chen Shui-bian’s (陳水扁) medical care was insufficient, the report was widely cited by many in the green camp as evidence that the President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) administration had mismanaged Chen’s healthcare. Many in the DPP praised the author of the report for his investigation.
The opposition parties are inconsistent with respect to the actions of Control Yuan. It is not possible for them to have their cake and eat it too. If the opposition parties are serious about taking up this cause, they really must be consistent in their attitudes and approaches if they are to achieve their goal.
Tiffany Hsiao
Rockville, Maryland
Economist’s claims ‘absurd’
Against the backdrop of Taiwan’s economy experiencing an international balance of payments fund outflow for the 12th consecutive quarter as investors pull their cash from local investment markets, economic quacks like Taishin Financial Holding spokesman Welch Lin (林維俊) are now encouraging cross-strait services deregulation in the banking industry (“Taishin urges service sector boost,” Aug. 21, page 13).
Lin reportedly said that the financial sector is the backbone of the modern service industry, but he failed to mention that the sector’s employees do not actually contribute anything to the real economy, in which people grow and build things.
He quoted statistics showing that financial sector services account for 70.4 percent of GDP in the UK and 58 percent in the US, then goes on to say that this sector amounts to “only” 25.8 percent of Taiwan’s economy, suggesting ample room for growth. Growth for what? More paper pushing and mouse clicking?
Given that the US and UK have been outsourcing their industrial production for decades, while their large banks simultaneously become so intertwined in revolving-door deals with regulators and governments that they are completely corrupted, Lin’s claim is absurd.
Statistics from Singapore, which is facing a looming financial crisis and has a preposterous Gini coefficient — with a ratio 55.2 percent of GDP — along with Hong Kong, home to the world’s largest property bubble outside of Ordos in Mongolia, at 49.1 percent, do not support Lin’s case very much.
However, it is a blessing that Taiwan’s overpriced property market is also experiencing “tax fears” and that corporate bond issuance has decreased markedly. It is also nice that Taiwanese analysts have finally come to the inevitable conclusion that economic growth appears “lukewarm.”
As an investor, I have no intention of taking my assets into “Formosa bonds,” which are linked to the Chinese yuan.
With today’s investments of time and treasure at their most critical for the future prosperity of mankind, people are living in a world where the blind are leading the blind. Bloomberg news in particular is repeating the deceitful memes of ever-expanding growth in a finite world, which is shameful for the Fourth Estate.
The disingenuous statement from Taishin’s spokesman belies the bank’s deep ignorance of what is currently roiling the markets and what is really happening on the ground. The bank’s board of directors is barking up the wrong tree. Shareholders could be handing their car keys to the mafia outside the Gentlemen’s Club, if you know what I mean.
Invest wisely out there. In the end, the one-eyed men will be kings.
Torch Pratt
New Taipei City
Saudi Arabian largesse is flooding Egypt’s cultural scene, but the reception is mixed. Some welcome new “cooperation” between two regional powerhouses, while others fear a hostile takeover by Riyadh. In Cairo, historically the cultural capital of the Arab world, Egyptian Minister of Culture Nevine al-Kilany recently hosted Saudi Arabian General Entertainment Authority chairman Turki al-Sheikh. The deep-pocketed al-Sheikh has emerged as a Medici-like patron for Egypt’s cultural elite, courted by Cairo’s top talent to produce a slew of forthcoming films. A new three-way agreement between al-Sheikh, Kilany and United Media Services — a multi-media conglomerate linked to state intelligence that owns much of
The US and other countries should take concrete steps to confront the threats from Beijing to avoid war, US Representative Mario Diaz-Balart said in an interview with Voice of America on March 13. The US should use “every diplomatic economic tool at our disposal to treat China as what it is... to avoid war,” Diaz-Balart said. Giving an example of what the US could do, he said that it has to be more aggressive in its military sales to Taiwan. Actions by cross-party US lawmakers in the past few years such as meeting with Taiwanese officials in Washington and Taipei, and
Denmark’s “one China” policy more and more resembles Beijing’s “one China” principle. At least, this is how things appear. In recent interactions with the Danish state, such as applying for residency permits, a Taiwanese’s nationality would be listed as “China.” That designation occurs for a Taiwanese student coming to Denmark or a Danish citizen arriving in Denmark with, for example, their Taiwanese partner. Details of this were published on Sunday in an article in the Danish daily Berlingske written by Alexander Sjoberg and Tobias Reinwald. The pretext for this new practice is that Denmark does not recognize Taiwan as a state under
The Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan has no official diplomatic allies in the EU. With the exception of the Vatican, it has no official allies in Europe at all. This does not prevent the ROC — Taiwan — from having close relations with EU member states and other European countries. The exact nature of the relationship does bear revisiting, if only to clarify what is a very complicated and sensitive idea, the details of which leave considerable room for misunderstanding, misrepresentation and disagreement. Only this week, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) received members of the European Parliament’s Delegation for Relations