Sat, Aug 10, 2013 - Page 9 News List

Owners took paper to peak of reporting, but stumbled on descent

By Ed Pilkington  /  The Guardian, New York

The picture tells the story: Captured from behind as they walk towards the exit of the boomingly empty auditorium of the Washington Post building are Don Graham, head of the legendary newspaper family, on the left, flanked by his wife and two of his children.

The photograph was posted on Facebook and Instagram by Marcus Brauchli, a former executive editor of the Post, shortly after Graham announced to a stunned newsroom that after 80 years in his family’s hands the paper was being sold to the Amazon founder, Jeff Bezos, for US$250m.

“A brave, selfless act, as hard as any, done with dignity and from loyalty,” Brauchli wrote beneath the image of the Grahams’ final moments in the institution they had so long cherished.

Whether media historians look back on the sale as a selfless act of bravery will depend largely on how Bezos conducts himself.

No one can dispute how hard the move was for Graham personally, for the wider family whose ownership stretches back to 1933 when the financier Eugene Meyer bought the Post in a bankruptcy sale, and for the staff of the paper.

The shock announcement led to an outpouring of sadness and nostalgia from employees.

One reporter recalled on Twitter the congratulatory notes Graham would regularly distribute to the authors of articles he had enjoyed.

“One of the great joys of working at Donald Graham’s Post: receiving a Donniegram in praise of an article. The newsroom’s favorite reader,” the reporter said.

The impact of the Graham era’s passing has rippled far beyond the newspaper building, and even beyond the US capital.

Under the family’s stewardship the Washington Post, arguably even more than the titan of US journalism the New York Times, came to epitomize the heyday of US newspapers.

That reputation had everything to do with Graham’s predecessor, his mother Katharine, who was thrown into the man’s world of newspapers on the suicide of her husband Philip in 1963. Instead of quitting, she outclassed them all. Three years after taking over the helm she was given the closest thing to a coronation in a republic: She was guest of honor at Truman Capote’s Black and White Ball.

Forging a formidable double act with her chosen editor-in-chief, Ben Bradlee, she matched glamor to gutsiness, standing behind her journalists as they negotiated choppy waters. First they succeeded along with the New York Times in batting off the government’s threat of prior restraint on publication of the Vietnam war Pentagon Papers, then in 1972 they hurled themselves into Watergate.

“The whole world was against us, and against her,” says Len Downie, executive editor of the Washington Post from 1991 to 2008. “As important as Watergate was in political history, the importance to us was Katharine Graham’s unstinting and vigorous support.”

Downie recalls listening over Carl Bernstein’s shoulder as the reporter was on the telephone to former US president Nixon’s attorney general John Mitchell when the official issued the memorable threat that if the Post went ahead with an upcoming article then “Katie Graham’s gonna get her tit caught in a big fat wringer.”

“No matter how tricky it was, no matter if the president was opposed to publishing, we always had the Grahams’ backing,” Downie says.

Challenging though they were journalistically, those days were easy at least in one regard — the money flow. From the 1970s through to the 1990s, the Post held a largely monopoly position in Washington, had only three TV networks to compete with for advertising and enjoyed at its peak in 1993 a solid base of more than 800,000 daily subscribers.

This story has been viewed 1224 times.
TOP top