The Ministry of Transportation and Communications recently decided to increase the cost of domestic flight tickets in three waves.
The decision has met with strong resistance from the residents of the outlying islands of Kinmen, Matsu and Penghu. Air transport is the main form of transportation for those who live on the islands.
These islands have a low elasticity of demand and when prices increase, airline monopolies make more money, although it is a huge blow for those living on the islands.
First, the average income of people living on the islands is not even two-thirds of what people living on Taiwan proper make.
Though they receive subsidies on their air tickets, price hikes will increase the burden for those who often have to travel and forth.
Also, once the prices are increased, the cost of tickets may surpass NT$5,000 (US$167), which is close to international tickets to places like Hong Kong and Macau.
The outlying islands, which are heavily reliant on the tourism industry, will suffer even more once flight prices go up because of the large choice of other destinations on offer to tourists.
This comes on top of impacts from the three links — direct transportation, communications and trade links between Taiwan and China.
The Civil Aeronautics Administration (CAA) justified the price hikes by saying that there has not been an increase for eight years and pointed to increases in the cost of fuel.
By increasing ticket prices, the airlines are planning to make consumers pay for their losses, which is unreasonable.
Most airline companies providing domestic flights are losing money and when we take a closer look into things, we will see that the main reason is not increased fuel prices.
There are studies that show that because of the abnormally competitive environment of the domestic flight market, when flight prices are raised, tickets sell on the market for less than that of their listed price and this is causing huge losses to airlines.
To turn around and demand that the ministry allow them to increase ticket prices to make up for their losses by citing the fact they have not increased ticket prices for many years is thus not a legitimate reason.
In addition, an excessive number of flights means that airline companies are not efficient.
Also, the opening of the highspeed rail had a large “magnet effect” that caused the passenger load of flights within Taiwan to shrink.
When this happened, the airline companies either lowered their prices to attract more customers, shut down, or reduced the number of flights offered.
A look at flights between Taiwan proper and Kinmen reveals that this has always been a popular route.
It normally has a passenger load of about 70 percent, although during peak season, all flights are full.
The annual revenues of the airline companies operating this route are in excess of NT$2 billion and it is only natural that these firms would give something back to the residents of Kinmen.
How can they say that flight costs to places further away will have to rise more, and then raise the cost of flights to Kinmen the most?
What sort of twisted logic is that?
It cannot be doubted that rises in fuel costs affect the profits of airline companies, although the CAA should look into whether deregulation of the domestic market has gone too far and whether this has resulted in an excessively competitive environment.
Airline companies should also think about how to become more efficient, lower their costs and then reflect these changes in their ticket prices.
There is really no way that they should be able to cite an increase in fuel costs alone and use that as an excuse to cover up the fact that they are not being run well, while requesting that ticket prices be increased to make up for their losses.
This reasoning is very unlikely to convince residents of these outlying islands.
A responsible government has the duty to protect the rights and interests of the people that live on the outlying islands and to allow them to enjoy convenient and reasonably priced flights.
In other words, the most basic need of those living on the outlying islands is a safe, convenient and reasonably priced way home.
Lee Wo-chiang is a professor in Tamkang University’s department of banking and finance.
Translated by Drew Cameron
Saudi Arabian largesse is flooding Egypt’s cultural scene, but the reception is mixed. Some welcome new “cooperation” between two regional powerhouses, while others fear a hostile takeover by Riyadh. In Cairo, historically the cultural capital of the Arab world, Egyptian Minister of Culture Nevine al-Kilany recently hosted Saudi Arabian General Entertainment Authority chairman Turki al-Sheikh. The deep-pocketed al-Sheikh has emerged as a Medici-like patron for Egypt’s cultural elite, courted by Cairo’s top talent to produce a slew of forthcoming films. A new three-way agreement between al-Sheikh, Kilany and United Media Services — a multi-media conglomerate linked to state intelligence that owns much of
The US and other countries should take concrete steps to confront the threats from Beijing to avoid war, US Representative Mario Diaz-Balart said in an interview with Voice of America on March 13. The US should use “every diplomatic economic tool at our disposal to treat China as what it is... to avoid war,” Diaz-Balart said. Giving an example of what the US could do, he said that it has to be more aggressive in its military sales to Taiwan. Actions by cross-party US lawmakers in the past few years such as meeting with Taiwanese officials in Washington and Taipei, and
The Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan has no official diplomatic allies in the EU. With the exception of the Vatican, it has no official allies in Europe at all. This does not prevent the ROC — Taiwan — from having close relations with EU member states and other European countries. The exact nature of the relationship does bear revisiting, if only to clarify what is a very complicated and sensitive idea, the details of which leave considerable room for misunderstanding, misrepresentation and disagreement. Only this week, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) received members of the European Parliament’s Delegation for Relations
Denmark’s “one China” policy more and more resembles Beijing’s “one China” principle. At least, this is how things appear. In recent interactions with the Danish state, such as applying for residency permits, a Taiwanese’s nationality would be listed as “China.” That designation occurs for a Taiwanese student coming to Denmark or a Danish citizen arriving in Denmark with, for example, their Taiwanese partner. Details of this were published on Sunday in an article in the Danish daily Berlingske written by Alexander Sjoberg and Tobias Reinwald. The pretext for this new practice is that Denmark does not recognize Taiwan as a state under