Last week, the Greater Tainan City Government traveled en masse to Kinmen to visit the Tainan soldiers stationed there. In the command headquarter auditorium, I noticed a sign with the text “Why is the national army fighting? It is fighting to protect the nation’s continued existence and development. Who are the national army fighting for? It is fighting for the people and their security and well-being.”
When I remembered what a retired general said in 2011, that “the national army and the People’s Liberation Army are both Chinese armies,” those two questions and answers made an even deeper impression on me.
Kinmen in June is scorching hot and humid, and the faces of the Tainan soldiers were covered in sweat. It is a source of pride to see them protect the nation’s territory despite living in such an environment. This is also why I was moved to say to these soldiers that we “may not be able to choose our ancestors, but the people have a right to decide the nation’s future and the future of their grandchildren. I hope that the national army will abide by the spirit of the Constitution and remain loyal to the people and protect our right to choose our future.”
A few days ago, the civil affairs department director in a certain city government told draftees reporting for duty that “unification across the Taiwan Strait is unavoidable” because “in this world, a long period of unity must end in separation, and a long period of separation must end in unity.” This is absurd. If it is determined that the two sides of the Taiwan Strait will unify, why do we even need an army? Why do our young have to waste their youth in this way?
We are living in the democratic era, and although countries continue to unite and separate — such as the separation following the collapse of the Soviet Union and the unification between the two Germanys — these separations and unifications result in more governments adhering to democratic values and more people enjoying freedom. There is no doubt that the further spread and consolidation of democracy and human rights is the trend of the times. The big demonstration in Hong Kong on July 1 offered further strong evidence of this trend.
However, authoritarianism is looking to make a comeback, and it is even disguising itself as a guardian of democracy in order to promote unification. Yet the true guardians of democracy are the soldiers who, at this very moment, are protecting 23 million Taiwanese. It is they who make up the strongest defense line for Taiwanese democracy, human rights and 23 million people.
It is like I said in a conversation with Chinese dissident Chen Guangcheng (陳光誠): “Democracy is a Taiwanese value and an advantage. We must use our democracy to direct change in China because a democratic China will make Taiwan more secure.”
That is why Taiwan should not sacrifice its democracy on the altar of excessive economic reliance on China.
We must stand up to defend democracy and the right of future generations to choose their own future.
Democracy is making Taiwan strong; to protect democracy is to protect the nation.
In the end, those who are using spurious arguments to blur people’s national identity will be proven to be contemptible clowns.
William Lai is mayor of Greater Tainan.
Translated by Perry Svensson
Could Asia be on the verge of a new wave of nuclear proliferation? A look back at the early history of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), which recently celebrated its 75th anniversary, illuminates some reasons for concern in the Indo-Pacific today. US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin recently described NATO as “the most powerful and successful alliance in history,” but the organization’s early years were not without challenges. At its inception, the signing of the North Atlantic Treaty marked a sea change in American strategic thinking. The United States had been intent on withdrawing from Europe in the years following
My wife and I spent the week in the interior of Taiwan where Shuyuan spent her childhood. In that town there is a street that functions as an open farmer’s market. Walk along that street, as Shuyuan did yesterday, and it is next to impossible to come home empty-handed. Some mangoes that looked vaguely like others we had seen around here ended up on our table. Shuyuan told how she had bought them from a little old farmer woman from the countryside who said the mangoes were from a very old tree she had on her property. The big surprise
The issue of China’s overcapacity has drawn greater global attention recently, with US Secretary of the Treasury Janet Yellen urging Beijing to address its excess production in key industries during her visit to China last week. Meanwhile in Brussels, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen last week said that Europe must have a tough talk with China on its perceived overcapacity and unfair trade practices. The remarks by Yellen and Von der Leyen come as China’s economy is undergoing a painful transition. Beijing is trying to steer the world’s second-largest economy out of a COVID-19 slump, the property crisis and
As former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) wrapped up his visit to the People’s Republic of China, he received his share of attention. Certainly, the trip must be seen within the full context of Ma’s life, that is, his eight-year presidency, the Sunflower movement and his failed Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement, as well as his eight years as Taipei mayor with its posturing, accusations of money laundering, and ups and downs. Through all that, basic questions stand out: “What drives Ma? What is his end game?” Having observed and commented on Ma for decades, it is all ironically reminiscent of former US president Harry