Earlier this month, former Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) chairman Wu Poh-hsiung (吳伯雄) and a KMT delegation met with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) in Beijing.
In a bid to curry favor with Xi, Wu said that “the two sides [of the Taiwan Strait] should promote nationalistic identity, because we cannot choose our ancestors,” a statement that has caused much controversy and discussion in Taiwan.
During his visit, Wu repeated the old cliche about lineage and blood ties, saying that Taiwan and China share the same language and their respective peoples belong to the same race.
Over the past week or so, many people have argued strongly against this view.
As a Taiwanese with free will and Taiwanese awareness, I feel that Wu’s statement was left unfinished.
One cannot choose one’s ancestors, nor can one change the fact that all humans are descendants of the hominids that developed in Eastern Africa.
However, that does not mean that people are not free to pursue an individual and community happiness, autonomously and freely.
In addition to the Aborigines that have lived in Taiwan for thousands of years, the ancestors of many people living in Taiwan today risked their lives crossing the strait from China to this unknown new land.
They did so to escape from war, disaster or hunger, hoping to pursue their happiness and that of their children.
Taiwan is the original homeland of the Austronesian peoples who are dispersed between Chile’s Easter Island in the east and Madagascar in the west.
Thousands of years ago, some brave Austronesians sailed from their Taiwanese homeland on wooden boats and began an ocean adventure stretching beyond the horizon, eventually settling Southeast Asia and Oceania. Those Austronesians did so out of their own free will and in the pursuit of a happy life. Nobody would criticize them as having forgotten their origins and ancestors.
Other peoples who pursued their happiness out of their own free will include those who relocated from British colonies and created the first 13 states of the US in the second half of the 18th century.
They fought the British officials and troops with whom they shared ancestors. Both sides “had no choice” in who their ancestors were.
Still, these early Americans chose to seek their happiness through a bloody revolution against British rule, an unfair tax system and policies.
The experience of this struggle is reflected in the US Declaration of Independence, which states: “We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.”
It is self-evident that these rights take precedence over the shackles of the outdated concept of lineage and blood ties.
To complete Wu’s statement: “Although one cannot choose one’s ancestors, everyone can pursue their own happiness.”
Chi Chun-chieh is a professor in the Department of Ethnic Relations and Cultures at National Dong Hwa University.
Translated by Eddy Chang
Saudi Arabian largesse is flooding Egypt’s cultural scene, but the reception is mixed. Some welcome new “cooperation” between two regional powerhouses, while others fear a hostile takeover by Riyadh. In Cairo, historically the cultural capital of the Arab world, Egyptian Minister of Culture Nevine al-Kilany recently hosted Saudi Arabian General Entertainment Authority chairman Turki al-Sheikh. The deep-pocketed al-Sheikh has emerged as a Medici-like patron for Egypt’s cultural elite, courted by Cairo’s top talent to produce a slew of forthcoming films. A new three-way agreement between al-Sheikh, Kilany and United Media Services — a multi-media conglomerate linked to state intelligence that owns much of
The US and other countries should take concrete steps to confront the threats from Beijing to avoid war, US Representative Mario Diaz-Balart said in an interview with Voice of America on March 13. The US should use “every diplomatic economic tool at our disposal to treat China as what it is... to avoid war,” Diaz-Balart said. Giving an example of what the US could do, he said that it has to be more aggressive in its military sales to Taiwan. Actions by cross-party US lawmakers in the past few years such as meeting with Taiwanese officials in Washington and Taipei, and
Denmark’s “one China” policy more and more resembles Beijing’s “one China” principle. At least, this is how things appear. In recent interactions with the Danish state, such as applying for residency permits, a Taiwanese’s nationality would be listed as “China.” That designation occurs for a Taiwanese student coming to Denmark or a Danish citizen arriving in Denmark with, for example, their Taiwanese partner. Details of this were published on Sunday in an article in the Danish daily Berlingske written by Alexander Sjoberg and Tobias Reinwald. The pretext for this new practice is that Denmark does not recognize Taiwan as a state under
The Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan has no official diplomatic allies in the EU. With the exception of the Vatican, it has no official allies in Europe at all. This does not prevent the ROC — Taiwan — from having close relations with EU member states and other European countries. The exact nature of the relationship does bear revisiting, if only to clarify what is a very complicated and sensitive idea, the details of which leave considerable room for misunderstanding, misrepresentation and disagreement. Only this week, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) received members of the European Parliament’s Delegation for Relations