Japanese Prime Minister Shinzo Abe on Wednesday unveiled the last of the “three arrows” in his arsenal to boost the country’s economy. The first two arrows — fiscal and monetary stimulus — were launched during the past six months to raise Japan’s short-term economic prospects.
However, Tokyo stocks tumbled 3.83 percent to close at a two-month low that day, an indication that investors were disappointed by Abe’s latest plans.
Since taking office after a landslide victory in December, Abe has used aggressive monetary easing and fiscal expansion to push down the value of the yen. This has in turn lifted Japan’s stock markets and people’s confidence in the economy, boosting the approval rating for his Cabinet.
However, overall optimism toward so-called “Abenomics” has started to sour. On May 23, Japanese stocks plunged by more than 7 percent amid concerns over global economic conditions and the impact on Japan’s export-reliant economy.
The public’s support of the prime minister’s reforms has also cooled recently. The latest approval rating for Abe’s Cabinet released on May 27 had dropped to 68 percent from a record 76 percent in April, according to the Nikkei business daily.
The key to Abe’s growth strategy is the structural reform of the economy, which is a matter Japan has not taken seriously in the past 20 years. But can the economy’s newly found recovery be sustained?
During the past few months, Abe has highlighted that the country needs to deregulate its labor, energy, environment, health and medicine sectors. He has also expressed his intention to reduce business regulation and increase corporate competitiveness.
A more important factor to Abe’s reform agenda is an affordable execution plan and a determination to carry it out. That is because many people remain fearful about drastic pledges to reform. They remember all too well what happened to the reform plans of former Japanese prime minister Junichiro Koizumi after he took office in 2001.
At that time, Koizumi promised to bring changes to the economy’s decade-long structural problems. His plans included slashing public works spending, cleaning up banks’ bad debts and pushing through privatization of the national post office, among others.
Unfortunately, Koizumi’s reforms lost steam after he stepped down in 2006. They were summed up by former Japanese deputy minister of finance Eisuke Sakakibara as more rhetoric than fact.
It is too early to say whether Abenomics will succeed in ending the country’s years of deflation and sluggish growth, but it is encouraging to see a government setting a clear economic agenda and operational guidelines on matters related to the reforms.
There is no such thing as “perfect reform” and neither is there a magic wand that can solve the nation’s decade-long problems in the short term.
If there is anything in Abenomics that deserves praise, it is the attempt to drum up Japanese confidence in the economy and offer corporations hope to turn their businesses around.
This is a lesson Taiwan can learn from Japan: The nation needs a government with vision for the future and that offers hope to people and businesses.
Over the years, our policymakers have demonstrated their seriousness in tackling the weakening economy with one stimulus plan after another, but their plans have either fallen short of deep regulatory changes or lacked action to effect structural changes in key industries.
More often, the government’s plans are based on electoral considerations rather than Taiwan’s long-term needs. However, the longer people lose faith in the efforts of policymakers to revive the economy, the greater the risk to their credibility.
Could Asia be on the verge of a new wave of nuclear proliferation? A look back at the early history of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), which recently celebrated its 75th anniversary, illuminates some reasons for concern in the Indo-Pacific today. US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin recently described NATO as “the most powerful and successful alliance in history,” but the organization’s early years were not without challenges. At its inception, the signing of the North Atlantic Treaty marked a sea change in American strategic thinking. The United States had been intent on withdrawing from Europe in the years following
My wife and I spent the week in the interior of Taiwan where Shuyuan spent her childhood. In that town there is a street that functions as an open farmer’s market. Walk along that street, as Shuyuan did yesterday, and it is next to impossible to come home empty-handed. Some mangoes that looked vaguely like others we had seen around here ended up on our table. Shuyuan told how she had bought them from a little old farmer woman from the countryside who said the mangoes were from a very old tree she had on her property. The big surprise
The issue of China’s overcapacity has drawn greater global attention recently, with US Secretary of the Treasury Janet Yellen urging Beijing to address its excess production in key industries during her visit to China last week. Meanwhile in Brussels, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen last week said that Europe must have a tough talk with China on its perceived overcapacity and unfair trade practices. The remarks by Yellen and Von der Leyen come as China’s economy is undergoing a painful transition. Beijing is trying to steer the world’s second-largest economy out of a COVID-19 slump, the property crisis and
As former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) wrapped up his visit to the People’s Republic of China, he received his share of attention. Certainly, the trip must be seen within the full context of Ma’s life, that is, his eight-year presidency, the Sunflower movement and his failed Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement, as well as his eight years as Taipei mayor with its posturing, accusations of money laundering, and ups and downs. Through all that, basic questions stand out: “What drives Ma? What is his end game?” Having observed and commented on Ma for decades, it is all ironically reminiscent of former US president Harry