The real danger for President Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) administration is not its persistently poor governance and falling credibility, but its leaders’ perception that they can run the country by putting on public relations exercises and manipulating the media.
The voices of the 23 million Taiwanese are strong, yet sometimes too noisy for the administration, which nevertheless pledged to listen to the people at all times.
People have tended to oppose everything the government proposed in the past five years. However, the Ma administration has not considered this too much of a headache because, as a local proverb says, politics is a performing art, and Ma’s administration has truly believed in the power of the media to sway public opinion from Day 1.
One does not need to look further to understand Ma’s mentality than his recent visit to fossil-fuel and nuclear power plants across the country, including the controversial Fourth Nuclear Power Plant in Gongliao District (貢寮), New Taipei City (新北市), and his much-criticized appearance at a military drill.
With a huge entourage of more than 100 members of the media, the trip was more public relations exercise than official government inspection. Everyone was aware it was an opportunity for the administration to endorse nuclear power and the construction of the Gongliao plant, despite Ma saying that he “was not trying to persuade anyone” to buy into the government’s position on nuclear power.
Ma, his usual camera-loving self, posed in front of a nuclear power plant for the print and television cameras. Meanwhile, every Taiwan Power Co employee who spoke at a symposium said nuclear power was the best option for Taiwan, as it were begging the president to keep developing nuclear power.
Just days before his “energy tour,” Ma was seen stepping out of the Presidential Office, formally dressed, without body armor, smiling to the cameras, before boarding an armored vehicle in a drill meant to simulate an evacuation from the Presidential Office under attack.
While the two examples might be funny, unbelievable and pathetic to some, such practices have been the norm during Ma’s presidency and might even date back to his days as Taipei mayor. Ma rose to political stardom because of his ability to play to the cameras and his advisers’ success in manipulating the media.
The “Ma Ying-jeou phenomenon,” arguably one of the primary reasons Ma won the presidential elections in 2008 and again last year, was such a success that his spin doctors never tire of playing the same tricks, neutralizing press coverage of a crisis with yet another agenda, time and again.
However, Ma and his advisers need to be reminded that politics is more than a performing art and it is not just a game of spinning the media. This administration must deliver on its pledges by carefully listening to the public.
Notable, too, have been Ma’s poor choice of words and arrogance when he has tried to communicate directly with people. It shows how detached he is from the public, reflecting how his administration and regular Taiwanese seem to be living in different worlds.
Regardless of how Ma and his team have mastered the art of spinning and performing, the show is — and it has to be — over, since he is not likely personally to participate in another major election.
If Ma is serious about the legacy of his eight years in office, he will need to forget the cameras, newspapers and TV news, because a president who looks good on TV is not guaranteed to look good in history.
Could Asia be on the verge of a new wave of nuclear proliferation? A look back at the early history of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), which recently celebrated its 75th anniversary, illuminates some reasons for concern in the Indo-Pacific today. US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin recently described NATO as “the most powerful and successful alliance in history,” but the organization’s early years were not without challenges. At its inception, the signing of the North Atlantic Treaty marked a sea change in American strategic thinking. The United States had been intent on withdrawing from Europe in the years following
My wife and I spent the week in the interior of Taiwan where Shuyuan spent her childhood. In that town there is a street that functions as an open farmer’s market. Walk along that street, as Shuyuan did yesterday, and it is next to impossible to come home empty-handed. Some mangoes that looked vaguely like others we had seen around here ended up on our table. Shuyuan told how she had bought them from a little old farmer woman from the countryside who said the mangoes were from a very old tree she had on her property. The big surprise
The issue of China’s overcapacity has drawn greater global attention recently, with US Secretary of the Treasury Janet Yellen urging Beijing to address its excess production in key industries during her visit to China last week. Meanwhile in Brussels, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen last week said that Europe must have a tough talk with China on its perceived overcapacity and unfair trade practices. The remarks by Yellen and Von der Leyen come as China’s economy is undergoing a painful transition. Beijing is trying to steer the world’s second-largest economy out of a COVID-19 slump, the property crisis and
As former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) wrapped up his visit to the People’s Republic of China, he received his share of attention. Certainly, the trip must be seen within the full context of Ma’s life, that is, his eight-year presidency, the Sunflower movement and his failed Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement, as well as his eight years as Taipei mayor with its posturing, accusations of money laundering, and ups and downs. Through all that, basic questions stand out: “What drives Ma? What is his end game?” Having observed and commented on Ma for decades, it is all ironically reminiscent of former US president Harry