The Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) on May 24 forecast that Taiwan’s GDP is set to grow by 2.4 percent this year, a drop of more than 1 percentage point adjustment from its February forecast. This was a major cut and it now seems that economic growth is unlikely to exceed 3 percent this year. Following the publication of the forecast, the government attracted widespread criticism, leading Premier Jiang Yi-huah (江宜樺) to announce a set of measures aimed at stimulating the lackluster economy.
The agency’s numerous forecast adjustments have made people question its abilities. However, adjustments to economic forecasts are standard practice. A comparison between the agency’s February forecast and its most recent one indicates that the driver for the downward adjustment was that export shipments for the first quarter of the year were lower than expected.
Taiwan’s economy is small and open, and fluctuations in the global economy can have a great impact on it. The global economy is affected by many factors and its performance is very difficult to forecast. Although the agency’s February forecast may have been slightly more optimistic than forecasts from other institutions, its recent downward adjustment was still reasonable.
Given current knowledge, economists still have a long way to go before they are able to deliver more precise forecasts. If those in charge of DGBAS were able to reliably forecast economic activity, they would have been picked up by overseas financial institutions long ago. Instead, the real problem is how economic forecasts should be considered, and whether they require direct responses.
Since economic forecasts are often not reliable, the government should not respond directly to them. According to media reports, the Cabinet immediately reacted to the DGBAS latest forecast by proposing measures to stimulate the economy. A closer look at these measures shows that most of them were already planned or in the process of being implemented, and their implementation was simply accelerated.
The announced NT$3.24 billion (US$108.2 million) investment is but a drop in the ocean in terms of the overall economy. Most of the announced measures are politically, not economically, motivated, and are largely symbolic.
Government policy should not be a direct response to such forecasts. If these hastily formulated measures were to have a substantive effect, the economy could perform even worse: Massive rushed investments would only lead to waste and misallocation of resources, and there is a risk that it could increase collusion between government and industry, benefiting the wealthy at the expense of the less well-off. This would do more harm than good to the nation.
After a prolonged slump, the economy is experiencing long-term structural problems that cannot be resolved by short-term stimulus measures. For ideological reasons and because of the composition of its supporter base, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) is constantly advocating closer ties with China. It does little to promote other forms of foreign investment to diversify risk, and nor does it encourage effective measures to upgrade industry and keep businesses in Taiwan.
The long-term result of this approach has been a cross-strait factor price-equalization that has caused real wages in Taiwan to stagnate.
Additionally, since President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) came to power, government policies have facilitated housing speculation, leading to high property prices that restrict the spending of workers and concentrates capital in an unproductive sector. The result is anaemic domestic demand.
Over the past few years, the government has tried to increase domestic demand while economic growth has been restricted by fluctuations in the global economy. However, to be able to stimulate domestic spending through government policy it is also necessary to effect increases in real salaries and to bring speculation in the housing market under control.
Regrettably, to be able to deal with these issues, it is necessary to touch on the interests of the KMT’s core supporters and that would hurt donations to the party. Since the problem goes deep, addressing it will be a painful experience. Further, since Ma lacks the courage, every Cabinet measure aimed at stimulating the economy will be perfunctory at best.
For policy implementation to have a tangible effect it is not necessary to focus on GDP growth. Rather than being concerned about a few tenths of a percent, it would be far better to improve income distribution and social security guarantees which would allow the public to maintain a reasonable standard of living in the face of the international economic slump.
In the past, the KMT always boasted that it was adept at handling the economy and had promoted a set of values focused on economic growth. Now that it has to deal with economic stagnation resulting from structural problems, it cannot stop the public from using economic growth as the only standard by which to measure political achievement.
Therefore, when performance is poor, Cabinet members with responsibility for economic and financial matters end up being scapegoats for Ma.
Sher Chien-yuan is an assistant professor of business management at National Sun Yat-sen University. Liu Yu-hsi is a candidate for a doctoral degree in economics at Suffolk University, Boston, Massachusetts.
Translated by Perry Svensson
Saudi Arabian largesse is flooding Egypt’s cultural scene, but the reception is mixed. Some welcome new “cooperation” between two regional powerhouses, while others fear a hostile takeover by Riyadh. In Cairo, historically the cultural capital of the Arab world, Egyptian Minister of Culture Nevine al-Kilany recently hosted Saudi Arabian General Entertainment Authority chairman Turki al-Sheikh. The deep-pocketed al-Sheikh has emerged as a Medici-like patron for Egypt’s cultural elite, courted by Cairo’s top talent to produce a slew of forthcoming films. A new three-way agreement between al-Sheikh, Kilany and United Media Services — a multi-media conglomerate linked to state intelligence that owns much of
The US and other countries should take concrete steps to confront the threats from Beijing to avoid war, US Representative Mario Diaz-Balart said in an interview with Voice of America on March 13. The US should use “every diplomatic economic tool at our disposal to treat China as what it is... to avoid war,” Diaz-Balart said. Giving an example of what the US could do, he said that it has to be more aggressive in its military sales to Taiwan. Actions by cross-party US lawmakers in the past few years such as meeting with Taiwanese officials in Washington and Taipei, and
The Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan has no official diplomatic allies in the EU. With the exception of the Vatican, it has no official allies in Europe at all. This does not prevent the ROC — Taiwan — from having close relations with EU member states and other European countries. The exact nature of the relationship does bear revisiting, if only to clarify what is a very complicated and sensitive idea, the details of which leave considerable room for misunderstanding, misrepresentation and disagreement. Only this week, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) received members of the European Parliament’s Delegation for Relations
Denmark’s “one China” policy more and more resembles Beijing’s “one China” principle. At least, this is how things appear. In recent interactions with the Danish state, such as applying for residency permits, a Taiwanese’s nationality would be listed as “China.” That designation occurs for a Taiwanese student coming to Denmark or a Danish citizen arriving in Denmark with, for example, their Taiwanese partner. Details of this were published on Sunday in an article in the Danish daily Berlingske written by Alexander Sjoberg and Tobias Reinwald. The pretext for this new practice is that Denmark does not recognize Taiwan as a state under