On Thursday last week, about 115,000 US civil servants, or 5 percent of the US federal government work force, were forced to take a day of unpaid leave because of the budget crunch.
National Federation of Federal Employees president Bill Dougan has expressed concern that if the US congressional standoff over the budget cuts is not resolved, more employees may be forced to take unpaid leave.
In late 2008, then-Californian governor Arnold Schwarzenegger laid off about 20,000 state employees and temporarily cut the salaries of 200,000 full-time state employees to the federal minimum wage of US$6.55 per hour.
Compared with US civil servants, Taiwanese civil employees are very lucky. Taiwan’s economy has been in dire straits since the financial crisis started and has deteriorated over time. Private-sector employees have been forced to take unpaid leave and some have even lost their jobs.
However, civil servants are under no such threat. The phrase “unpaid leave” is not part of their vocabulary and salary cuts are taboo.
Two years ago, despite a rising national debt, civil servants were given a salary increase of 3 percent, while employees at state-owned CPC Corp, Taiwan, and Taiwan Power Co — both of which have long been operating at a loss — continued to receive annual performance bonuses of between 4.3 and 4.6 months of their salary. They are indeed very lucky.
Last year, the government revised down its annual GDP forecast nine times. Economic growth in the first quarter of this year also fell below the government forecast of 3.26 percent, at 1.54 percent.
Despite this ridiculous performance, President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) has said that the public should not blame or criticize civil servants because “if we did, who would ever want to become a civil servant?”
The question is, why would anyone not want to be a civil servant? Civil service is an iron rice bowl guaranteeing lifetime employment and benefits.
Ma has also asked: “How will telling an official who made an inaccurate forecast to step down solve the problem?”
One or two mistakes may be chalked down to inaccurate forecasting, but when it happens nine or 10 times in a row, it shows an unwillingness to face up to reality by reporting only the good news while ignoring the bad. With that approach, it will become impossible to solve issues that originally stood a chance of being resolved.
Is it really impossible to fire civil servants, cut their salaries or tell them to take unpaid leave? The US, the world’s biggest economy, has given us the answer to that question.
As Mencius (孟子) said: “Life springs from sorrow and calamity, and death from ease and pleasure.” Does it not apply to civil servants too?
Chang Kuo-tsai is a retired associate professor at National Hsinchu University of Education and a former deputy secretary-general of the Taiwan Association of University Professors.
Translated by Perry Svensson
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
The past few months have seen tremendous strides in India’s journey to develop a vibrant semiconductor and electronics ecosystem. The nation’s established prowess in information technology (IT) has earned it much-needed revenue and prestige across the globe. Now, through the convergence of engineering talent, supportive government policies, an expanding market and technologically adaptive entrepreneurship, India is striving to become part of global electronics and semiconductor supply chains. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Vision of “Make in India” and “Design in India” has been the guiding force behind the government’s incentive schemes that span skilling, design, fabrication, assembly, testing and packaging, and
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
As former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) wrapped up his visit to the People’s Republic of China, he received his share of attention. Certainly, the trip must be seen within the full context of Ma’s life, that is, his eight-year presidency, the Sunflower movement and his failed Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement, as well as his eight years as Taipei mayor with its posturing, accusations of money laundering, and ups and downs. Through all that, basic questions stand out: “What drives Ma? What is his end game?” Having observed and commented on Ma for decades, it is all ironically reminiscent of former US president Harry