Taipei has undergone massive changes in recent decades, with new areas springing up and old ones being demolished or redeveloped. Very little appears to be permanent, save a few relics like the four remaining city gates. Communities are razed, despite the protests of residents, in the name of modernity. Often the protests come too late, along with the question: “Why was something not done sooner to try and save it?”
The latest addition to the list of endangered environments is Novel Hall in Taipei’s Xinyi District (信義). The 935-seat theater was built by the Koo (辜) family’s Chinatrust Commercial Bank as part of its headquarters’ facility and became Taipei’s first privately operated performing arts center when it opened in 1997.
Named after the original Novel Hall that Koo Hsian-jung (辜顯榮) established in 1915 in Taipei, the theater is the home stage for the Taipei Li-Yuan Peking Opera Theatre and the annual Novel Hall Dance Series. It has hosted a variety of local and international theater, dance and music groups, and has become an integral part of Taipei’s cultural life. It is run by Vivien H.C. Ku (辜懷群), a granddaughter of Koo Hsian-jung.
The theater had just reopened on Sept. 23 last year after undergoing a multimillion-dollar upgrade of its lighting and stage system, so it was a major shock when Chinatrust announced on May 4 that it would be selling its Songshou Road location as part of a planned move to new headquarters in Nangang District (南港), and that the theater would have to go.
A protest Web page was set up, cultural icons such as Cloud Gate Dance Theatre founder Lin Hwai-min (林懷民) and author Kenneth Pai (白先勇) called for the theater’s preservation, Minister of Culture Lung Ying-tai (龍應台) asked for consultations, questions were raised in the Taipei City Council and Taipei Mayor Hau Lung-bin (郝龍斌) spoke of promises made before the Xinyi site was developed.
On Friday last week, Hau promised the city government would present written documents within a week to remind the company of its promise — although as of press time last night there had been no further word from him or sight of the documents. Meanwhile, Taipei Deputy Mayor Chang Chin-oh (張金鶚) said the city would not agree to any request from the company to reclassify the land or demolish the theater.
Left unasked was the question of how this situation was allowed to reach a crisis point to begin with.
Chinatrust Financial Holding began construction at its Nangang site in 2009, mentioning in its past few annual reports that the site would be home to a 30-story headquarters building, a 20-story commercial building and a 14-story business hotel, with a moving date set for next year. There was no mention of a theater at the new place, though now company officials say they will try to find a place in Nangang for one.
Company officials note that under the Banking Act (銀行法), the banking industry is not allowed to invest in commercial real estate, so Chinatrust has to sell the Xinyi site.
Given that the relocation has been planned for years and the Banking Act’s requirements are well known, why were questions not raised about Novel Hall’s fate back in 2009? What about last year, when the Ministry of Culture, among other benefactors, gave NT$20 million (US$667,100) to subsidize Novel Hall’s overhaul? Why was Chinatrust not asked about its intentions before the fundraising began and so much money was allocated?
Novel Hall is unique precisely because it is privately run and has been able to avoid the staleness of city-run sites such as Chungshan Hall and Metropolitan Hall. It plays a vital role in Taipei life, one that would be hard to replicate in Nangang. Hopefully, the company, the city, the ministry and others will be able to work out some arrangement to keep the theater where it is. However, it is equally important to determine why no one noticed the threat to the theater before May 4. What other development time bombs are ticking away?
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
Since the Russian invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, people have been asking if Taiwan is the next Ukraine. At a G7 meeting of national leaders in January, Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida warned that Taiwan “could be the next Ukraine” if Chinese aggression is not checked. NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg has said that if Russia is not defeated, then “today, it’s Ukraine, tomorrow it can be Taiwan.” China does not like this rhetoric. Its diplomats ask people to stop saying “Ukraine today, Taiwan tomorrow.” However, the rhetoric and stated ambition of Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) on Taiwan shows strong parallels with