To the Confucian scholar Hsun Tzu (荀子), writing in China 2,500 years ago, calling things by the right name was imperative.
If things were properly named, “there is no longer the danger of people’s ideas not being understood,” Hsun Tzu said.
“All that are alike are given the same name,” said Hsun Tzu (not to be confused with Sun Tzu (孫武), the military strategist), and “all that are unalike are given different names.”
This concept, called by some the “rectification of names,” is as applicable today as it was in ancient times.
Take the vast region that is the area of operations for the US’ Pacific Command (PACOM) with its headquarters in Honolulu. PACOM’s territory stretches from the west coast of the US to the east coast of Africa and from the North Pole to the South Pole. Until recently, that expanse was widely referred to as the “Asia-Pacific” region.
Now comes a subtle shift in the name of that region, a slight change that suggests more intense competition between the US and China as each seeks to draw India and the rest of South Asia into its camp.
In the late 1980s, the US defined the “Asia-Pacific” region as China; Northeast Asia, meaning Japan, Korea and the Russian far east; Southeast Asia, meaning the nations on the shores of the South China Sea; Australia and the Pacific islands.
India and South Asia were largely ignored.
However, today, without any fanfare, that area has been renamed the “Indo-Asia-Pacific” region. The focus of attention has been enlarged to take in India and the other nations of South Asia plus the Indian Ocean through which passes two-thirds of the world’s oil shipments and one-third of its bulk cargo each year.
This revision began during the watch of US Navy admiral Timothy Keating as the PACOM commander; he visited New Delhi twice to widen US contacts. His successor, US Navy admiral Robert Willard, set up a small cell of specialists within his headquarters to fashion a long-term strategy for expanding US military relations with India.
The current commander, US Navy Admiral Samuel Locklear, introduced the term “Indo-Asia-Pacific” in testimony before a US Congressional committee last month.
He said the “Indo-Asia-Pacific” region drives the world economy and was home to the world’s largest democracy, India, and the smallest republic, Nauru.
Locklear also pointed out that this is “the world’s most militarized region with seven of the 10 largest standing militaries, the world’s largest and most sophisticated navies, and five of the world’s declared nuclear armed nations,” Russia, China, India, North Korea and the US
The US is not alone in revising their terms. In Australia, whose west coast faces the Indian Ocean, a “White Paper on Defense” released earlier this month launched the term “Indo-Pacific” as an emerging concept. It sets Australia’s strategic focus on “the arc extending from India through Southeast Asia to Northeast Asia.”
The white paper says the new term reflects India’s new stature “as an important strategic, diplomatic, and economic actor” more engaged in regional frameworks. The paper notes that India has adopted a “look east” tactic to forge new relations with the nations of Southeast Asia.
China, with its expressed objection to being “contained,” is keenly aware of the shift in strategic outlook at PACOM and in Canberra and is seeking to counter it.
Indian Minister of Foreign Affairs Salman Khurshid was welcomed in Beijing last week by Chinese Minister of Foreign Affairs Wang Yi (王毅). Chinese Premier Li Keqiang (李克強) visited India this week.
Wang contended, diplomatically, that China and India were “strategic partners by nature.”
That came against a backdrop of years of border disputes, China’s alliance with India’s adversary, Pakistan and increasing political competition for influence throughout Asia.
At the same time, US and Australian officials privately questioned whether India was prepared to play a major role in the region or on the globe.
They said Indian politicians and bureaucrats seemed stuck in the Cold War days when India proclaimed that it was “non-aligned,” pacifist and aloof from the critical issues of the day.
Several critics pointed to a recent issue of the Economist magazine, edited in Britain, the former colonial ruler of India.
The editors wrote that “India’s politicians and bureaucrats show little interest in grand strategy.”
The magazine contended that the Indian diplomatic service was weak and officials of the Indian Ministry of Defense were unprofessional.
“Whereas China’s rise is a given, India is still widely seen as a nearly-power that cannot quite get its act together,” the magazine said.
Richard Halloran is a commentator in Hawaii.
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
The past few months have seen tremendous strides in India’s journey to develop a vibrant semiconductor and electronics ecosystem. The nation’s established prowess in information technology (IT) has earned it much-needed revenue and prestige across the globe. Now, through the convergence of engineering talent, supportive government policies, an expanding market and technologically adaptive entrepreneurship, India is striving to become part of global electronics and semiconductor supply chains. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Vision of “Make in India” and “Design in India” has been the guiding force behind the government’s incentive schemes that span skilling, design, fabrication, assembly, testing and packaging, and
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.