The Ministry of Finance has said that while the capital gains tax on securities transactions can be amended, it cannot be abolished. It would be better the other way around: It would be more appropriate to abolish, not amend, the tax.
First, there is just one reason given for why the tax cannot be abolished: tax justice. However, this is just a ruse. If tax justice were an inviolable principle, but foreign investors are exempt from it, what kind of justice is that? Furthermore, the tax on futures transactions, in which only large institutional investors can afford to invest, was cut in half last month, from 0.00004 percent to 0.00002 percent, and this month the Cabinet has passed a gaming act that gives a 20-year tax exemption on gambling income.
Giving such favors to the gaming industry, but implementing such a harsh tax system on the stock market, which is where the general public can participate, runs counter to what the government calls its “principle of justice.”
Second, levying a capital gains tax on securities transactions is outdated. In the past, it was indeed an effective tax, but times have changed. The flow of capital has been deregulated, stock markets in different countries are linked to each other and foreign investors are given preferential treatment in order to vitalize markets. These changes have brought us further away from ideas of justice and fairness.
Taiwan is very close to the stock markets in China, a country with which its shares a common language, and China, including Hong Kong, does not levy a capital gains tax on securities transactions. This does not mean that it would be impossible for Taiwan to implement such a tax, but doing so is a losing gambit both in terms of effect and in terms of international competitiveness.
Furthermore, the tax has in practice become a tax on the middle class and less well-off ordinary people. Seventy or 80 years ago, the tax was indeed a tax on the wealthy, but following globalization and liberalization, foreign investors have become the main investors in the stock market and the tax has thus become a tax directed at the middle class and the less well-off that are just entering the stock market.
As of March, there were 9.12 million stock market investment accounts in the nation. Although the stock market was anemic last year, trading still occurred in 3.67 million of those accounts. In particular over the past several years when real-estate prices have shot through the roof so that young people can only dream of owning their own house, the stock market has become the only place — apart from the lottery — where people can build their dreams.
The government’s plan to implement the capital gains tax on securities transactions and block people from realizing their dreams is a heavy blow to investors.
Over the past decade, China’s economic appeal may have attracted many Taiwanese businesses, but Taiwan’s stock market’s ability to maintain a higher earnings ratio than in neighboring countries has reaped benefits for major institutional investors. The credit for this should go to the insistence on exemption from the capital gains tax on securities transactions for foreign firms which has allowed Taiwan to maintain a reasonable level of economic growth.
Those academics, media outlets and officials that advocate their false brand of “justice” by opposing the abolition of the capital gains tax on securities transactions should stop being taken in by this outdated idea that only serves to destroy growth. They should give ordinary people and small retail investors a chance to build and realize their own dreams.
Huang Tien-lin is a former presidential adviser.
Translated by Perry Svensson
Could Asia be on the verge of a new wave of nuclear proliferation? A look back at the early history of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), which recently celebrated its 75th anniversary, illuminates some reasons for concern in the Indo-Pacific today. US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin recently described NATO as “the most powerful and successful alliance in history,” but the organization’s early years were not without challenges. At its inception, the signing of the North Atlantic Treaty marked a sea change in American strategic thinking. The United States had been intent on withdrawing from Europe in the years following
My wife and I spent the week in the interior of Taiwan where Shuyuan spent her childhood. In that town there is a street that functions as an open farmer’s market. Walk along that street, as Shuyuan did yesterday, and it is next to impossible to come home empty-handed. Some mangoes that looked vaguely like others we had seen around here ended up on our table. Shuyuan told how she had bought them from a little old farmer woman from the countryside who said the mangoes were from a very old tree she had on her property. The big surprise
The issue of China’s overcapacity has drawn greater global attention recently, with US Secretary of the Treasury Janet Yellen urging Beijing to address its excess production in key industries during her visit to China last week. Meanwhile in Brussels, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen last week said that Europe must have a tough talk with China on its perceived overcapacity and unfair trade practices. The remarks by Yellen and Von der Leyen come as China’s economy is undergoing a painful transition. Beijing is trying to steer the world’s second-largest economy out of a COVID-19 slump, the property crisis and
The past few months have seen tremendous strides in India’s journey to develop a vibrant semiconductor and electronics ecosystem. The nation’s established prowess in information technology (IT) has earned it much-needed revenue and prestige across the globe. Now, through the convergence of engineering talent, supportive government policies, an expanding market and technologically adaptive entrepreneurship, India is striving to become part of global electronics and semiconductor supply chains. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Vision of “Make in India” and “Design in India” has been the guiding force behind the government’s incentive schemes that span skilling, design, fabrication, assembly, testing and packaging, and