The Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) has long had difficulties attracting members. Following recent media reports that numerous people with ties to the underworld had applied to join the party, DPP chairman Su Tseng-chang (蘇貞昌) found himself set upon from both within his own party and without.
Although the party’s central office immediately denied the claims, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) had a field day.
Member votes form the basis of the DPP’s leadership elections and the party power structure, as well as one of the main sources for nominations for election to public office. They will affect the nominations for next year’s seven-in-one elections, and even those for the 2016 presidential election.
The DPP has always been paranoid about infiltration by the KMT, and has kept itself a tight-knit operation, one that is not very easy to join. Despite a recent push for greater internal party democracy, the party’s structure has seen few changes in recent years.
Also, as civil society seems to become more apathetic and more reluctant to get involved, problems with attracting new members remain.
The main players in the DPP can be divided into two types: The first attracts supporters by virtue of their record in public office, and these supporters then become members. The second type includes local figures who see attracting members as a form of political investment to secure their own nominations or to engage in factional politics. The former attracts members through their political convictions; the latter just brings people to wherever they want them to vote and hands out temporary membership cards together with a list of who to vote for.
Initially, the DPP had opted for voting by local leaders, allowing party members in public positions to decide candidates, but the emergence of internal vote-buying scandals, especially involving legislators, forced a change. The party then implemented US-style primaries to select a candidate for the nation’s first presidential election in 1996, choosing Peng Ming-min (彭明敏), who had recently returned from exile in the US.
This system was subsequently abandoned, as several factions within the party were reluctant to relinquish control.
More recently, public polls have gained importance, and have completely replaced nominations by party members only, allowing all potential voters to decide the candidate. This not only minimizes distortions introduced by the party membership, but also appeals to the wider public.
Political parties cannot require people to provide a certificate to prove they have no criminal record when applying for party membership. The DPP is strictly vetting applicants, and now the party’s Central Standing Committee has decided that new party members would only be allowed to run or vote in party elections after they have been a member for two years. This decision will have serious repercussions, for it increases the current membership’s power and influence within the party, making the party vulnerable to factional control.
The party needs to strike a balance between how it would like to do things and what is realistic.
Party membership reform presents the party’s central leadership with a difficult choice. The DPP is still a fairly closed organization, and it needs to decide if it wants to open up and move in the direction of how political parties are run in the US. It needs to decide if it is willing to allow funding to come mainly from political donations, to allow regular party members to choose central and local party leaders and to allow candidates for public office to be selected through open primaries.
This could be a painful process, but reform is likely to go in this direction in the long run.
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
The past few months have seen tremendous strides in India’s journey to develop a vibrant semiconductor and electronics ecosystem. The nation’s established prowess in information technology (IT) has earned it much-needed revenue and prestige across the globe. Now, through the convergence of engineering talent, supportive government policies, an expanding market and technologically adaptive entrepreneurship, India is striving to become part of global electronics and semiconductor supply chains. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Vision of “Make in India” and “Design in India” has been the guiding force behind the government’s incentive schemes that span skilling, design, fabrication, assembly, testing and packaging, and
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
As former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) wrapped up his visit to the People’s Republic of China, he received his share of attention. Certainly, the trip must be seen within the full context of Ma’s life, that is, his eight-year presidency, the Sunflower movement and his failed Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement, as well as his eight years as Taipei mayor with its posturing, accusations of money laundering, and ups and downs. Through all that, basic questions stand out: “What drives Ma? What is his end game?” Having observed and commented on Ma for decades, it is all ironically reminiscent of former US president Harry