Taiwan’s television news channels are becoming as well-known for making news as for covering it, and not in a good way. This is why the excessive coverage given by several channels to the Chinese entertainment show I Am A Singer (我是歌手) should not have been a surprise, although the National Communications Commission is probing the matter and could slap Eastern TV (ETTV) and CtiTV — and other stations — each with a NT$2 million (US$66,000) fine for their obsequious pandering.
However, the implications of the attention paid to the Chinese TV show make the incident more than just a violation of regulations and journalistic ethics these stations regularly commit with their over-the-top coverage of the deaths of entertainers and gruesome homicide cases.
First, these stations must have aired the show for a reason, which presumably was the participation of four Taiwanese singers. There has been a massive exodus of Taiwanese actors, actresses, singers, filmmakers and producers to China in recent years — both current stars and retired ones — seeking to boost or reboot their careers. Perhaps it is time to examine why going to China seems to be their best option. However, is it really all that different from the hollowing out of Taiwan’s economy by the flood of Taiwanese businesspeople and companies heading across the Taiwan Strait?
Second, the fallout from broadcasts has been dazzling. Not only has China’s Hunan TV, which airs I Am A Singer, reportedly threatened to sue the Taiwanese stations for intellectual property infringement, a mudslinging match has erupted among TV stations and local media outlets.
CtiTV officials held a press conference to announce plans to sue the Liberty Times (the Taipei Times’ sister newspaper) for publishing false stories and defamation, saying the paper claimed the station had aired the entire four-hour show when it had only provided extended coverage during its regular news hour.
The China Times, owned by Tsai Eng-meng’s (蔡衍明) Want Want China Times Group, which also owns CtiTV, has given extensive coverage to the controversy surrounding the show, targeting both the Liberty Times and the Association of Taiwan Journalists, which the China Times accused of making statements in favor of the Liberty Times. To many, the furor looked like payback for the recent battle over Tsai’s bid to purchase part of Next Media Group’s Taiwanese TV and print operations.
Such peer rivalry would not count for much, except for the “China specter” looming over it.
Democratic Progressive Party Chairman Su Tseng-chang (蘇貞昌) said the actions of some of the Taiwanese TV stations showed that China’s strategy of inserting itself “into the island, into households and into the brains” (入島,入戶,入腦) of Taiwanese was working. However, his linking of I Am A Singer to Beijing’s use of “soft power” — economic and cultural influences — to tie Taiwan closer to it has been criticized as an “over-interpretation” of events and a lack of confidence in Taiwan’s own soft power.
However, the growing Chinese influence in almost every aspect of Taiwanese life — especially in the economy, the media and culture — is undeniable and one cannot help but wonder about the long-term effects. Beijing’s attempts at “invisible annexation” of Taiwan appear to be along the lines of its efforts to mold Hong Kong into its likeness both before and after the 1997 handover of the territory.
While economic dependence on China seems to be an irreversible trend, how successful Beijing is in winning the “hearts and minds” of the Taiwanese ultimately depends on the Taiwanese themselves and how steadfast their determination is to retain their own identity, morals and mores. This may be the most valuable lesson to be drawn from the controversy over I Am A Singer.
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
The past few months have seen tremendous strides in India’s journey to develop a vibrant semiconductor and electronics ecosystem. The nation’s established prowess in information technology (IT) has earned it much-needed revenue and prestige across the globe. Now, through the convergence of engineering talent, supportive government policies, an expanding market and technologically adaptive entrepreneurship, India is striving to become part of global electronics and semiconductor supply chains. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Vision of “Make in India” and “Design in India” has been the guiding force behind the government’s incentive schemes that span skilling, design, fabrication, assembly, testing and packaging, and
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.