The local media have recently been paying close attention to the unpredictable situation on the Korean Peninsula. The reports generally focus on either North Korea’s military strength or the impact on Taiwan’s economic interests.
However, if we were to expand our view, we would see that the issue offers an opportunity to rethink cross-strait relations.
Having North Korea — which The Economist has called “the nastiest regime on the planet” — as a neighbor must be an endless nightmare for South Koreans. North Korean leader Kim Jong-un might get burned if he continues to play with fire, but it is not unimaginable that Seoul, just 40km from the demilitarized zone, would also get burned.
Even if the crisis is resolved this time, another one will surely follow somewhere down the road.
The threat that North Korea poses is not limited to its military ambition, but also a whole population of brainwashed people living in ignorance and poverty.
The Kim dynasty will collapse sooner or later, but when that happens, South Korea will have a difficult mess to deal with.
For example, western Germany has poured 2 trillion euros (US$2.62 trillion) into eastern Germany since their unification, yet the east continues to lag behind the west in development.
Perhaps that was why former South Korean president Lee Myung-bak restrained himself after two attacks from the north.
In comparison, Taiwanese are lucky in that the regime across the Taiwan Strait is not ruled by hoodlums such as those in North Korea.
Of course, the People’s Republic of China (PRC) is not a democratic regime: It is a police state that exercises tight control over freedom of expression, and is merciless in cracking down on dissent.
Those at the top are corrupt, and they show no concern for those at the bottom. Even so, the Chinese regime is behaving relatively rationally in international and cross-strait relations.
Despite its little tricks from time to time, Beijing has in general played the game according to civilized rules.
As long as Taiwanese do not intentionally provoke China, they do not have to lose too much sleep over the 1,000 missiles deployed in China’s Fujian Province.
Nonetheless, it is not something that should be taken for granted.
The older generation still remember that prior to the 1960s, when China was ruled by Mao Zedong (毛澤東), the battle between Taiwan and China was a battle of life and death.
Mao was a dictator who did not care about the millions of Chinese who starved to death. For Taiwan at the time, the shadow of “bloody liberation” loomed large.
After the more pragmatic Chinese leader Deng Xiaoping (鄧小平) introduced reforms and promoted an open policy, China turned its focus to economic development. Since then, Chinese authorities have toned down their policy of annexing Taiwan by force.
If then-president Chiang Ching-kuo (蔣經國) had not been willing to accept Beijing’s “olive branch” in a timely manner, the qualitative change in the Chinese Communist Party might not have been enough to escape the standoff between the two sides.
Over the past five years, President Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) government has maintained peaceful cross-strait exchanges.
For some people, exchanges with China are like “drinking poison to relieve thirst,” because Beijing’s goal is still “reunification.”
Those who are opposed to cross-strait exchanges accuse Ma of “leaning toward China while selling out Taiwan.” However, the future is unpredictable. Who can guarantee that China will democratize?
No matter what, China is Taiwan’s neighbor. Compared to the possible military conflict that might break out anytime between North and South Korea, Taiwan is better off. South Koreans must be very envious.
Although the Chinese power transition was not democratic, this enlightened autocratic state is very unlikely to produce a little hooligan that strains the nerves of the whole world and even threatens to plunge millions of people into misery.
The Korean war, which ended 60 years ago, gave Taiwan a new lease on life. Luckily the two sides of the Taiwan Strait have now managed to end the risk of war.
In addition to treasuring what we have, we can only pray for the people of North and South Korea.
Huang Juei-min is a law professor at Providence University.
TRANSLATED BY EDDY CHANG
Could Asia be on the verge of a new wave of nuclear proliferation? A look back at the early history of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), which recently celebrated its 75th anniversary, illuminates some reasons for concern in the Indo-Pacific today. US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin recently described NATO as “the most powerful and successful alliance in history,” but the organization’s early years were not without challenges. At its inception, the signing of the North Atlantic Treaty marked a sea change in American strategic thinking. The United States had been intent on withdrawing from Europe in the years following
My wife and I spent the week in the interior of Taiwan where Shuyuan spent her childhood. In that town there is a street that functions as an open farmer’s market. Walk along that street, as Shuyuan did yesterday, and it is next to impossible to come home empty-handed. Some mangoes that looked vaguely like others we had seen around here ended up on our table. Shuyuan told how she had bought them from a little old farmer woman from the countryside who said the mangoes were from a very old tree she had on her property. The big surprise
The issue of China’s overcapacity has drawn greater global attention recently, with US Secretary of the Treasury Janet Yellen urging Beijing to address its excess production in key industries during her visit to China last week. Meanwhile in Brussels, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen last week said that Europe must have a tough talk with China on its perceived overcapacity and unfair trade practices. The remarks by Yellen and Von der Leyen come as China’s economy is undergoing a painful transition. Beijing is trying to steer the world’s second-largest economy out of a COVID-19 slump, the property crisis and
As former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) wrapped up his visit to the People’s Republic of China, he received his share of attention. Certainly, the trip must be seen within the full context of Ma’s life, that is, his eight-year presidency, the Sunflower movement and his failed Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement, as well as his eight years as Taipei mayor with its posturing, accusations of money laundering, and ups and downs. Through all that, basic questions stand out: “What drives Ma? What is his end game?” Having observed and commented on Ma for decades, it is all ironically reminiscent of former US president Harry