After having been delayed for many years, fisheries negotiations between Taiwan and Japan have finally been concluded and an agreement has been reached.
Japan’s willingness to make concessions was mainly due to cooperation in several areas.
In terms of timing, the conflict between China and Japan over the Diaoyutai Islands (釣魚台), which Japan calls the Senkaku Islands, started heating up last year.
In addition, Taiwanese fishermen and activists working to protect Republic of China (ROC) sovereignty over the islands have also entered the disputed area.
Of course, Japan does not want to have to deal with both Taiwanese and Chinese sovereignty claims over the Diaoyutais at the same time. Since it seems unlikely that tensions between China and Japan will ease in the short term, the only way to avoid a situation where China and Taiwan would cooperate on the issue was for Japan to pro-actively bring the fisheries agreement with Taiwan to a conclusion.
From a geographical perspective, the scope of the fisheries dispute between Taiwan and Japan did not only include traditional Taiwanese fishing grounds, it also included the waters around the Diaoyutais.
Japan was hoping to take advantage of the talks to create a tacit agreement between the two countries regarding the waters around the islands. This would allow Japan to effectively control the area and reduce the risk of conflict with Taiwan over the disputed territory.
Finally, in terms of human relations, the main Japanese representative during the negotiations was Koji Ishikawa of the China division at the Japanese foreign ministry. While serving in the same division in 1999, he was in charge of planning the first fisheries talks between Taiwan and Japan.
He fully understood the importance of the talks to the relationship between the two countries and he was also very familiar with the content of the negotiations.
When he returned to the China division for the recently concluded talks, he was naturally very familiar with the situation and was able to deal smoothly with protests from the Japanese Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries and from fishermen in Okinawa, and push through the talks.
One question that arises is what future political ramifications the fisheries agreement will have.
First, it means a platform has been established for handling fisheries issues between Taiwan and Japan.
In the past, the fisheries issue has always constituted the biggest bone of contention between the two nations. The most important result of this agreement is that it establishes a fisheries commission to function as a platform for resolving fisheries disputes and conflicts between the two countries.
The commission can even handle questions concerning the two countries’ fishing quotas in the Northern Pacific and the Southern Atlantic oceans and thus help further stabilize Taiwanese-Japanese relations.
Second, it sets a precedent for agreements between the two countries.
In the past, the level of official exchanges between Taiwan and Japan has always been too low, but following the common understanding reached during these talks, the two sides will be able to elevate the official level of exchange when handling procedural talks.
This will facilitate bilateral talks and once the precedent has been set, it will be helpful for holding procedural talks.
Tsai Zheng-jia is head of the Second Research Division at the Institute of International Relations at National Chengchi University.
Translated by Perry Svensson
With its passing of Hong Kong’s new National Security Law, the People’s Republic of China (PRC) continues to tighten its noose on Hong Kong. Gone is the broken 1997 promise that Hong Kong would have free, democratic elections by 2017. Gone also is any semblance that the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) plays the long game. All the CCP had to do was hold the fort until 2047, when the “one country, two systems” framework would end and Hong Kong would rejoin the “motherland.” It would be a “demonstration-free” event. Instead, with the seemingly benevolent velvet glove off, the CCP has revealed its true iron
At the end of last month, Paraguayan Ambassador to Taiwan Marcial Bobadilla Guillen told a group of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) legislators that his president had decided to maintain diplomatic ties with Taiwan, despite pressure from the Chinese government and local businesses who would like to see a switch to Beijing. This followed the Paraguayan Senate earlier this year voting against a proposal to establish ties with China in exchange for medical supplies. This constituted a double rebuke of the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) diplomatic agenda in a six-month span from Taiwan’s only diplomatic ally in South America. Last year, Tuvalu rejected an
US President Donald Trump’s administration on Friday last week announced it would impose sanctions on the Xinjiang Production and Construction Corps, a vast paramilitary organization that is directly controlled by the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and has been linked to human rights violations against Uighurs and other ethnic minorities in Xinjiang. The sanctions follow US travel bans against other Xinjiang officials and the passage of the US Hong Kong Autonomy Act, which authorizes targeted sanctions against mainland Chinese and Hong Kong officials, in response to Beijing’s imposition of national security legislation on the territory. The sanctions against the corps would be implemented
US President Donald Trump on Thursday issued executive orders barring Americans from conducting business with WeChat owner Tencent Holdings and ByteDance, the Beijing-based owner of popular video-sharing app TikTok. The orders are to take effect 45 days after they were signed, which is Sept. 20. The orders accuse WeChat of helping the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) review and remove content that it considers to be politically sensitive, and of using fabricated news to benefit itself. The White House has accused TikTok of collecting users’ information, location data and browsing histories, which could be used by the Chinese government, and pose