South Africa not homophobic
What Stephen Whitehead wrote in an opinion piece about South Africa is not only spurious; it is also incorrect and insulting to South African society as a whole (“‘Gay index’ underrates Taiwan,” April 7, page 8).
Whitehead states with seeming authority that “it is difficult to understand how South Africa and Mexico — two of the most violent, sexist and homophobic countries on the planet — can be ranked above, or indeed even alongside, Thailand, a country where being lesbian, gay, bisexual or transgender (LGBT) is acceptable, if not openly tolerated across most levels of society.”
I cannot speak for Mexico, but on the topic of South Africa, allow me to set the record straight (no pun intended).
Yes, there is a lot of violent crime in South Africa, but the number of incidents has been falling steadily for several years — so much so that the country does not even appear on those regularly published “most violent in the world” lists anymore, like it used to.
However, for the life of me, how is South Africa “sexist and homophobic?”
This is not what I want to address, but Whitehead may be surprised to learn that South Africa is widely seen as having one of the constitutions that most empowers women among modern democracies. For instance, it is far, far easier for a woman to get a job than it is for many men, and women have experienced true legal and social upliftment since the birth of democracy in South Africa. Their rights have also been specifically enshrined in the constitution and are enforced.
The thing that really got my goat was Whitehead’s unfounded utterance about South Africa being homophobic. On what facts is this complete nonsense based on?
It would have been easy for Whitehead to understand why South Africa is ranked above or alongside Thailand as far as gay rights are concerned, if he had done his homework before putting pen to paper.
In South Africa, gay people have the legal right to get married. They have the legal right to adopt children. They have the right to do anything they please, as long as their actions fall within the boundaries of the country’s laws — just like all people in the country, of whatever sexual orientation.
South Africa’s LGBT citizens live their lives openly, with complete acceptance and, in many cases, to great acclaim. LGBT people form an integral and vibrant part of South African society, and play an important role in that young democracy’s development. Without fear of a backlash of any kind, gay people in South Africa — regardless of color — openly occupy important positions, from much-loved, award-winning authors, artists and musicians, to high-power senior judges, opinion-makers and masters of commerce.
Cape Town is not called the “San Francisco of Africa” for nothing. I would like to see a city in Thailand where gay people openly contribute so much to the place where they live, and where events like the annual Mother City Queer Project parties are held and attended by thousands of gay and straight people from all over the world.
There are people of all sexual orientations who have fought long and hard to get LGBT people the legal rights that they deserve. The LGBT community itself has won the right to live openly, unfettered and completely accepted in a country known as the Rainbow Nation. For anybody to suggest otherwise out of ignorance of the facts is a slap in the face to all South Africans.
Carina Koen
Taipei
Could Asia be on the verge of a new wave of nuclear proliferation? A look back at the early history of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), which recently celebrated its 75th anniversary, illuminates some reasons for concern in the Indo-Pacific today. US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin recently described NATO as “the most powerful and successful alliance in history,” but the organization’s early years were not without challenges. At its inception, the signing of the North Atlantic Treaty marked a sea change in American strategic thinking. The United States had been intent on withdrawing from Europe in the years following
My wife and I spent the week in the interior of Taiwan where Shuyuan spent her childhood. In that town there is a street that functions as an open farmer’s market. Walk along that street, as Shuyuan did yesterday, and it is next to impossible to come home empty-handed. Some mangoes that looked vaguely like others we had seen around here ended up on our table. Shuyuan told how she had bought them from a little old farmer woman from the countryside who said the mangoes were from a very old tree she had on her property. The big surprise
The issue of China’s overcapacity has drawn greater global attention recently, with US Secretary of the Treasury Janet Yellen urging Beijing to address its excess production in key industries during her visit to China last week. Meanwhile in Brussels, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen last week said that Europe must have a tough talk with China on its perceived overcapacity and unfair trade practices. The remarks by Yellen and Von der Leyen come as China’s economy is undergoing a painful transition. Beijing is trying to steer the world’s second-largest economy out of a COVID-19 slump, the property crisis and
As former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) wrapped up his visit to the People’s Republic of China, he received his share of attention. Certainly, the trip must be seen within the full context of Ma’s life, that is, his eight-year presidency, the Sunflower movement and his failed Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement, as well as his eight years as Taipei mayor with its posturing, accusations of money laundering, and ups and downs. Through all that, basic questions stand out: “What drives Ma? What is his end game?” Having observed and commented on Ma for decades, it is all ironically reminiscent of former US president Harry