In the Panchkhal Valley of Nepal, shadowed by the Himalaya Mountains, platoons of soldiers from 11 nations are being trained in peacekeeping tactics so that they can be ready to don the blue helmets of a UN peacekeeping mission.
This is not easy, because peacekeeping operations call for deep-seated changes in attitudes among soldiers who have been trained to use maximum force to defeat an enemy. In contrast, peacekeeping requires soldiers to apply only that force needed to separate adversaries and bring calm to a hostile situation.
Experienced peacekeepers have likened their work to police wading into a barroom brawl. First they separate the fighters, then stand watch to keep them apart, and finally seek to bring permanent calm to everyone affected.
For soldiers, this means learning and executing new rules of engagement, not an easy task when they have been trained to kill enemies. In a successful peacemaking and peacekeeping operation, there are no enemies and no one gets hurt.
Sergeant Major Gerald Cornell of the US Army, who has been training peacekeepers for five years, said: “Soldiers are often asked to do things for which we are not prepared. So we have to be flexible. We can do any mission we are given, but it is better if we are prepared for it.”
The sergeant major, who is assigned to the US Pacific Command headquarters in Honolulu, Haiwaii, was speaking in a telephone call from the Panchkhal Valley.
“We train trainers” who then go home to train other soldiers in peacekeeping, he said, adding that restraint in the use of force was taught in every aspect of the course in Nepal.
The platoons of 30 to 35 soldiers being trained in the two-week exercise in the Panchkhal Valley came from Bangladesh, Cambodia, Indonesia, Japan, Jordan, Kazakhstan, Mongolia, Nepal, Philippines, Paraguay and Rwanda. Instruction is in English, with each platoon having brought translators with them. Working with translators was among the learning points in peacekeeping, Cornell said.
Nepal, land of the famed Gurkha warriors, has had decades of blue helmet experience, while Mongolia, home of the 13th-century conqueror Genghis Khan, is relatively new to such operations. The same is true of Japan, long reluctant to be involved in military operations abroad after its devastating defeat in World War II.
The training centers hold field exercises in which civilians, played by Nepalese citizens, need to be protected. In the use of force, peacekeepers are trained to react, not to initiate, and apply only enough force to stop hostilities. In each drill, respect for basic human rights is emphasized.
Some drills are modifications of standard military tactics — guards in checkpoints examining documents, perhaps searching for weapons. Troops practice running convoys in which local customs are observed. Food and medicine are distributed fairly with troops preventing mobs from overrunning supply points.
This field exercise was preceded by a seminar on peacekeeping for officers from 10 nations in the Nepalese army headquarters in Kathmandu, the capital. Lieutenant General Netra Bahadur Thapa, chief of staff, said at the seminar: “UN peacekeepers are facing very complex challenges and are often required to implement intricate mandates.”
In particular, “protection of civilians, [preventing] sex and gender-based violence, sexual exploitation and abuse, and human securities are all matters of grave concern for the UN,” the general said.
For the US, training for peacekeeping can be divided into two phases. From 2005 through 2009, it did much of the training, both of US and foreign soldiers. In that period, 87,000 soldiers were trained, 77,000 of which were African.
From 2010 through to 2014, under the US State Department’s Global Peace Operations Initiative, the US has been supporting other nations that are engaged in preparing for peacekeeping missions. In this case, Americans have been assisting the Nepalese.
As of the beginning of the year, 14 UN peacekeeping operations were under way, mostly in Africa the UN said. Others were posted in India, Pakistan, Lebanon and Kosovo.
About 78,000 soldiers, 16,800 civilians, 12,500 police officers and 1,800 military observers have been deployed in hopes of keeping the peace.
Richard Halloran is a commentator in Hawaii.
Saudi Arabian largesse is flooding Egypt’s cultural scene, but the reception is mixed. Some welcome new “cooperation” between two regional powerhouses, while others fear a hostile takeover by Riyadh. In Cairo, historically the cultural capital of the Arab world, Egyptian Minister of Culture Nevine al-Kilany recently hosted Saudi Arabian General Entertainment Authority chairman Turki al-Sheikh. The deep-pocketed al-Sheikh has emerged as a Medici-like patron for Egypt’s cultural elite, courted by Cairo’s top talent to produce a slew of forthcoming films. A new three-way agreement between al-Sheikh, Kilany and United Media Services — a multi-media conglomerate linked to state intelligence that owns much of
The US and other countries should take concrete steps to confront the threats from Beijing to avoid war, US Representative Mario Diaz-Balart said in an interview with Voice of America on March 13. The US should use “every diplomatic economic tool at our disposal to treat China as what it is... to avoid war,” Diaz-Balart said. Giving an example of what the US could do, he said that it has to be more aggressive in its military sales to Taiwan. Actions by cross-party US lawmakers in the past few years such as meeting with Taiwanese officials in Washington and Taipei, and
Denmark’s “one China” policy more and more resembles Beijing’s “one China” principle. At least, this is how things appear. In recent interactions with the Danish state, such as applying for residency permits, a Taiwanese’s nationality would be listed as “China.” That designation occurs for a Taiwanese student coming to Denmark or a Danish citizen arriving in Denmark with, for example, their Taiwanese partner. Details of this were published on Sunday in an article in the Danish daily Berlingske written by Alexander Sjoberg and Tobias Reinwald. The pretext for this new practice is that Denmark does not recognize Taiwan as a state under
The Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan has no official diplomatic allies in the EU. With the exception of the Vatican, it has no official allies in Europe at all. This does not prevent the ROC — Taiwan — from having close relations with EU member states and other European countries. The exact nature of the relationship does bear revisiting, if only to clarify what is a very complicated and sensitive idea, the details of which leave considerable room for misunderstanding, misrepresentation and disagreement. Only this week, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) received members of the European Parliament’s Delegation for Relations