The Cabinet’s announcement last week that it plans to set up “free economic pilot zones” presents a significant challenge to the nation. While the plan is aimed at stimulating economic growth and development, the enormous investment benefits and tax incentives budgeted for these economic zones will have a sizeable impact on the domestic economy, both positively and negatively.
According to the Cabinet’s blueprint, the pilot zones would be aimed at developing the high-end service sector in Taiwan, including international logistics centers, international medical services centers as well as production and marketing centers for value-added agricultural products. In addition, the government expects the zones to help local companies promote industrial innovation and integration.
It seems that the government has proposed the pilot zones to attract foreign investment because it is far easier to start its economic liberalization experiments in designated areas rather than in the nation as a whole. In addition, the government would be able to open Taiwan’s market in a measured way to avoid creating a sudden shock to the economy, while allowing policymakers to learn from the pilot areas before introducing nationwide changes.
In view of a lackluster track record in attracting foreign direct investment in recent years, along with slow progress in industrial transformation characterized by the “hollowing out” of the nation’s manufacturing sector and the underdeveloped service sector, the plan for pilot zones shows policymakers’ desire to open up and stimulate economic growth. However, the government has already provided investment benefits, tax breaks and other deregulation measures in its previous free-trade zones project, and in the Asia-Pacific regional operations center plan in the 1990s. What makes its latest scheme any different? If these measures did not work previously, how will they work this time?
Last week, government officials said the tax revenue generated from the pilot zones would grow quickly to offset the loss of tax revenue because of its tax breaks.
Perhaps, before pondering what measures should be offered to attract investors, policymakers should ask themselves this question: If the Asia-Pacific regional operations center plan, which was copied from Singapore, failed to become a reality, why would this plan for free economic pilot zones, based on South Korea’s Incheon free economic zone, have a chance of succeeding?
According to local media reports, policymakers seem more confident this time because of improved trade relations with China. However, one has to wonder whether the plan for pilot zones will become nothing more than an upgraded model under the Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement, rather than one that will help improve Taiwan’s infrastructure, business environment and living environment to embrace more multinational companies.
The government has said the establishment of these pilot zones will create conditions that will pave the way for participation in regional trade blocs, but for now that is just wishful thinking.
In the near term the government will have to face opposition from farmers, labor unions and civic organizations over concern about job losses and other possible negative side-effects caused by greater deregulation and liberalization in these pilot zones.
Surely, no one will oppose the government’s efforts to further the nation’s economic development. However, the success of its plan will depend on the government’s ability to learn from experience and draw up complementary measures for the plan.
The government will need to take bold steps in reforms, making the pilot zones an experimental field for a future opening-up drive. So before the policymakers can confidently indicate their optimism about the plan, they should make sure the government has done what is right and necessary.
Saudi Arabian largesse is flooding Egypt’s cultural scene, but the reception is mixed. Some welcome new “cooperation” between two regional powerhouses, while others fear a hostile takeover by Riyadh. In Cairo, historically the cultural capital of the Arab world, Egyptian Minister of Culture Nevine al-Kilany recently hosted Saudi Arabian General Entertainment Authority chairman Turki al-Sheikh. The deep-pocketed al-Sheikh has emerged as a Medici-like patron for Egypt’s cultural elite, courted by Cairo’s top talent to produce a slew of forthcoming films. A new three-way agreement between al-Sheikh, Kilany and United Media Services — a multi-media conglomerate linked to state intelligence that owns much of
The US and other countries should take concrete steps to confront the threats from Beijing to avoid war, US Representative Mario Diaz-Balart said in an interview with Voice of America on March 13. The US should use “every diplomatic economic tool at our disposal to treat China as what it is... to avoid war,” Diaz-Balart said. Giving an example of what the US could do, he said that it has to be more aggressive in its military sales to Taiwan. Actions by cross-party US lawmakers in the past few years such as meeting with Taiwanese officials in Washington and Taipei, and
Denmark’s “one China” policy more and more resembles Beijing’s “one China” principle. At least, this is how things appear. In recent interactions with the Danish state, such as applying for residency permits, a Taiwanese’s nationality would be listed as “China.” That designation occurs for a Taiwanese student coming to Denmark or a Danish citizen arriving in Denmark with, for example, their Taiwanese partner. Details of this were published on Sunday in an article in the Danish daily Berlingske written by Alexander Sjoberg and Tobias Reinwald. The pretext for this new practice is that Denmark does not recognize Taiwan as a state under
The Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan has no official diplomatic allies in the EU. With the exception of the Vatican, it has no official allies in Europe at all. This does not prevent the ROC — Taiwan — from having close relations with EU member states and other European countries. The exact nature of the relationship does bear revisiting, if only to clarify what is a very complicated and sensitive idea, the details of which leave considerable room for misunderstanding, misrepresentation and disagreement. Only this week, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) received members of the European Parliament’s Delegation for Relations