As the nation celebrates Youth Day today in commemoration of the dozens of young patriots who sacrificed their lives for the birth of a new country more than a century ago, Taiwanese should also be proud of today’s young people, who, in some ways, are even more courageous than their predecessors and perhaps deserve their own Youth Day.
Youth Day was designated in memory of the more than 80 revolutionaries killed in the Huanghuagang Uprising (also known as the “Yellow Flower Mound Uprising”) on April 27, 1911. The uprising failed, but eventually led to the Xinhai Revolution later that year that overthrew the Qing Dynasty and led to the establishment of the Republic of China (ROC).
In the past century, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) regime in Taiwan has advocated the spirit of the “72 martyrs” — only 72 bodies were identified in the aftermath of the failed uprising — using their patriotic act to inspire young people.
Let us first put aside the potential argument that some, staunch Taiwan independence supporters in particular, might raise about the relationship between the ROC and Taiwan, and how young Taiwanese nowadays could relate to and find motivation in the bravery of the martyrs across the Taiwan Strait more than 100 years ago: For them to die for what they believed in was truly admirable.
However, times have changed. Barring military conflicts and wars, it would be difficult for young people today to imagine that they would have to give up their lives to safeguard their country.
Born in the post-Martial Law era, they could be inspired by Deng Nan-jung’s (鄭南榕) self-immolation and death for freedom of speech and democracy, yet they probably could not imagine themselves having to do the same thing to fight an authoritarian regime, because Taiwan without democracy is the furthest thing from their minds.
While many see young people today as the “strawberry generation,” a group that is spoiled and selfish, who do not work hard and do not care, they have shown they do care about what is happening around them and when they have the determination, they work very hard.
Perhaps because they were born in a democratic era and “take democracy for granted,” these young people value equality, freedom and justice more than their predecessors, which is why, in the past two years, they have fought against injustice and the things they believe jeopardize the world in which they live.
They fought in Losheng (樂生), Huaguang (華光) and Wenlin Yuan (文林苑) against mandatory demolition by the government, as well as against the Miramar Resort in Taitung and Kuokuang Petrochemical Technology Co’s plans to build a chemical plant in Changhua County, projects that could endanger the environment.
They marched in the streets against monopolization of the media and besieged government buildings not once, but many times, vowing to make their voices heard.
In some ways, young people have taken on the spirit of the 72 martyrs and the ideology the former authoritarian regime bestowed upon Taiwanese with its slogan: “This is your country; save it by yourself.”
Some of them may go into politics, some may work for civic groups, while others will simply become fathers, mothers and employees who work in fields unrelated to advocacy. However, it seems very likely that they will be citizens who care and try to change the world for the better.
If young people keep doing what they are doing, they could be the first generation since the late 1980s to bring about epoch-making changes to Taiwan.
That would be a movement everyone can relate to and, perhaps, they deserve a Youth Day of their own.
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
The past few months have seen tremendous strides in India’s journey to develop a vibrant semiconductor and electronics ecosystem. The nation’s established prowess in information technology (IT) has earned it much-needed revenue and prestige across the globe. Now, through the convergence of engineering talent, supportive government policies, an expanding market and technologically adaptive entrepreneurship, India is striving to become part of global electronics and semiconductor supply chains. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Vision of “Make in India” and “Design in India” has been the guiding force behind the government’s incentive schemes that span skilling, design, fabrication, assembly, testing and packaging, and
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.