Talks over the Trade and Investment Framework Agreement (TIFA) between Taiwan and the US that were delayed for five years recently started up again.
The agreement is essentially a mechanism for negotiating trade issues between the US and nations it could possibly enter into free trade agreements (FTA) with.
Taiwan and the US began the trade talks in 1994. At the time, the US was Taiwan’s most important export market. Because Taiwan had not yet joined the WTO, it lacked a communication platform with the US, and the TIFA was very helpful in solving trade issues between the two countries, minimizing trade friction and furthering bilateral trade.
The resumption of TIFA talks is very encouraging for Taiwan.
However, the real challenge has only just started. After a hiatus of five years, it is easy to imagine that the US and Taiwan will have many trade issues to discuss and it is impossible that this most recent round of talks will solve them all in one go. Lessons learned need to be remembered for the TIFA talks to progress smoothly.
Taiwan is an important market for US agricultural products, and during past TIFA meetings the US always viewed agriculture as a priority.
This time has been no exception, with the most important issue being pork. The import of US beef and pork both hinge on to whether Taiwan has adopted food safety laws in line with international standards and whether the government can effectively explain the reliability of those standards to the public.
Looking back at the previous issue of US beef imports, Taiwan still has a lot of room for improvement. In particular, given that pork imports will have a much larger effect on Taiwan’s domestic agricultural industry than the importation of US beef, the government needs to be careful and strive for completeness when it comes to future negotiation strategies, related policies and other measures. Taiwan should rationally face these issues and avoid politicizing them.
Apart from agriculture, the government should strive to handle other issues the US is concerned about, such as investment, taxes, intellectual property rights, government procurement and market liberalization, in an appropriate manner.
Taiwan should also leverage the TIFA to gain entry into the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) which is directed by the US. In recent years, increasing regional economic integration has begun to threaten Taiwan. There are 11 countries currently involved in the TPP and Japan may also soon join. If this happens, about a third of Taiwan’s exports will be tied up with TPP members and the nation would be deeply affected if it is unable to join the TPP soon.
Gaining entry into the TPP would be beneficial for Taiwan because it would help increase its exports, but the TPP operates to high standards of free trade, so Taiwan must also prepare itself to open up its markets. The primary condition in doing this is to make the US and other TPP members believe that Taiwan is determined to open its markets, promote trade liberalization and carry out reform. This is the only way to assure Taiwan’s entry to the TPP.
If the nation remains indecisive when it comes to liberalization and hesitant when dealing with systems reform, instead adopting a conservative wait-and-see approach, there will be no way for Taiwan to gain the US’ support in the future for entry into the TPP. All attempts to use the TIFA as platform for TPP membership will then have been in vain.
Liu Da-nien is head of the Regional Development Study Center of the Chung-Hua Institution for Economic Research.
Translated by Drew Cameron
Could Asia be on the verge of a new wave of nuclear proliferation? A look back at the early history of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), which recently celebrated its 75th anniversary, illuminates some reasons for concern in the Indo-Pacific today. US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin recently described NATO as “the most powerful and successful alliance in history,” but the organization’s early years were not without challenges. At its inception, the signing of the North Atlantic Treaty marked a sea change in American strategic thinking. The United States had been intent on withdrawing from Europe in the years following
My wife and I spent the week in the interior of Taiwan where Shuyuan spent her childhood. In that town there is a street that functions as an open farmer’s market. Walk along that street, as Shuyuan did yesterday, and it is next to impossible to come home empty-handed. Some mangoes that looked vaguely like others we had seen around here ended up on our table. Shuyuan told how she had bought them from a little old farmer woman from the countryside who said the mangoes were from a very old tree she had on her property. The big surprise
The issue of China’s overcapacity has drawn greater global attention recently, with US Secretary of the Treasury Janet Yellen urging Beijing to address its excess production in key industries during her visit to China last week. Meanwhile in Brussels, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen last week said that Europe must have a tough talk with China on its perceived overcapacity and unfair trade practices. The remarks by Yellen and Von der Leyen come as China’s economy is undergoing a painful transition. Beijing is trying to steer the world’s second-largest economy out of a COVID-19 slump, the property crisis and
Former president Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) trip to China provides a pertinent reminder of why Taiwanese protested so vociferously against attempts to force through the cross-strait service trade agreement in 2014 and why, since Ma’s presidential election win in 2012, they have not voted in another Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) candidate. While the nation narrowly avoided tragedy — the treaty would have put Taiwan on the path toward the demobilization of its democracy, which Courtney Donovan Smith wrote about in the Taipei Times in “With the Sunflower movement Taiwan dodged a bullet” — Ma’s political swansong in China, which included fawning dithyrambs