In the annals of Chinese bureaucratic power, the Ministry of Railways stood apart. Running everything from one of the world’s busiest rail systems to a special police force, the ministry that Chinese called “Boss Railway” was so pervasive and powerful it resisted government reform efforts for years.
On Sunday, Beijing gave notice that it was firing the boss. Under a plan presented to the National People’s Congress — China’s largely rubber-stamp legislature — to restructure Cabinet departments, the government said it would dismantle the ministry, moving its railways operations to a newly created company and placing its regulatory offices in the Chinese Ministry of Transport.
The railway ministry is not the only target of reform: Under the restructuring plan, two agencies that censor broadcasters and print media will be combined into a super media regulator; the commission that enforces the much disliked rules that limit many to only having one child will be merged with the Chinese Ministry of Health; and five agencies that police fisheries and other maritime resources are being united to better assert China’s control over disputed waters, potentially sharpening conflicts with Taiwan, Japan, Vietnam and the Philippines.
Certain to be passed by the legislature this week, the plan reflects the priorities of the newly installed Chinese Communist Party leadership as it seeks to reduce waste, boost efficiency and address quality-of-life issues for a more prosperous, demanding society. The scope and power of the railways ministry made it a natural place for the leadership to stamp its determination. As it expanded the railway system and built the world’s largest high-speed rail network, the ministry ran up hundreds of billions of US dollars in debt and sank into corruption, giving critics an opportunity to pounce.
Reformers crowed at the ministry’s abolition, saying it would further reforms.
“It means the country has removed the last ‘stronghold’ in the way of reforming the industry from a planned economy to market economy,” the Xinhua news agency quoted Wang Yiming (王一鳴), deputy head of the Academy of Macroeconomic Research under the National Development and Reform Commission, as saying.
Even the current — and seemingly last — railways minister had to bow to the inevitable.
“I’ve no regrets. Whether I’m minister of railways or not is no matter,” Sheng Guangzu (盛光祖) said on China National Radio. “The key is to develop China’s railways. I’m subordinate to the needs of the national cause.”
Reform-minded Chinese leaders and officials had been trying to bring the railways to heel for 15 years when the government first started separating state companies from regulatory bodies. At each turn, the ministry resisted, using long-standing ties to the military and building a record for performance. Over the past decade, it created the showcase high-speed rail system touted by the leadership as a symbol for Chinese technological power on par with the space program.
In announcing the restructuring, a senior Chinese official praised the progress, but explained why the ministry had to be abolished.
“In recent years, the railways have developed in leaps and bounds, and safeguarded the smooth running of the economy and the needs of people’s lives and production. However, its government and enterprises are not separated. It doesn’t link smoothly with other modes of transport and there are other problems,” Chinese State Council Secretary-General Ma Kai (馬凱) told legislators.
Complaints about the railway system are common among Chinese. It is the most widely used form of long-distance transport, especially for Chinese who cannot afford to fly. However, buying a ticket is difficult, and food, drink and other services on trains are poor — problems often attributed to corruption.
“Corruption? Of course there is in the railway bureau. There’s that Boss Railway,” 32-year-old businessman Chang Shangxi said as he waited for a high-speed train in Shanghai last week.
“I am sure corruption causes corners to be cut and work to be faked as the companies have to make the money back that they spent on corruption,” he added.
The ministry’s ability to throw money around to get things done and preserve its power ultimately contributed to its downfall.
Former Chinese minister of railways Liu Zhijun (劉志軍), the bullet train network’s top promoter, was ousted two years ago amid accusations that he took massive bribes and steered contracts, some of them associated with the high-speed rail. Among his rumored misdeeds: having 18 mistresses.
Though he awaits trial, his fate — and perhaps the ministry’s — seemed sealed when bullet trains collided near the city of Wenzhou in July 2011, killing 40 people and injuring 177. The accident outraged the country’s growing middle class — the primary users of high-speed trains. Taking to social media sites, they questioned whether speedy development resulted in shoddy work. A government investigation cited design flaws and mismanagement.
In the aftermath, the government began taking a harder look at corruption throughout the railways and the ministry. In one case, almost all of a US$260 million railway line in the country’s northeast had to be redone because unqualified sub-contractors filled bridge foundations with rocks and sand instead of concrete.
The ministry employs 2.1 million staff and handled 1.8 billion passengers in 2011. Its subsidiary departments oversee all railway operations and its companies are involved with everything from the design of railways to construction and freight transport. Beyond that, there is the Railway Art Troupe, which sings, dances and puts on acrobatic shows and operas. The China Locomotive Sports Team trains athletes in soccer, boxing, weightlifting, swimming, and track and field. Until August last year, it operated its own courts, as it did a police force until 2009. Capital spending last year was 630 billion yuan (US$100 billion) — rivaling the 670 billion yuan budgeted for the entire military — and its mounting debts have worried the government.
“Who is going to pay the debt that is expected to amount to nearly 3 trillion yuan?” Beijing Jiaotong University railway expert Zhao Jian (趙堅 ) asked.
He said the official debt figure is 2.6 trillion yuan, but he estimates it will rise as ongoing projects are completed.
The reorganization is supposed to add further restraint. The newly created China Railway Corporation will build and manage freight and passenger services, while a railways administration under the Ministry of Transport will set technical standards and enforce them.
The railway so far has been able to rely for a large part on drawing revenue from freight and passenger services. A big challenge ahead is keeping that money coming in as competition from planes, cars and river transport increases.
Associated Press researchers Yu Bing in Beijing and Fu Ting in Shanghai contributed to this report
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
The past few months have seen tremendous strides in India’s journey to develop a vibrant semiconductor and electronics ecosystem. The nation’s established prowess in information technology (IT) has earned it much-needed revenue and prestige across the globe. Now, through the convergence of engineering talent, supportive government policies, an expanding market and technologically adaptive entrepreneurship, India is striving to become part of global electronics and semiconductor supply chains. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Vision of “Make in India” and “Design in India” has been the guiding force behind the government’s incentive schemes that span skilling, design, fabrication, assembly, testing and packaging, and
As former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) wrapped up his visit to the People’s Republic of China, he received his share of attention. Certainly, the trip must be seen within the full context of Ma’s life, that is, his eight-year presidency, the Sunflower movement and his failed Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement, as well as his eight years as Taipei mayor with its posturing, accusations of money laundering, and ups and downs. Through all that, basic questions stand out: “What drives Ma? What is his end game?” Having observed and commented on Ma for decades, it is all ironically reminiscent of former US president Harry