After Jiang Yi-huah (江宜樺) took over as premier last month, Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Chairman Su Tseng-chang (蘇貞昌) set a “3-4-5” goal for the Cabinet this year: A 3 percent increase in the average salary, an unemployment rate below 4 percent and an economic growth rate above 5 percent.
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) responded by launching a publicity campaign saying that Su would be responsible if the government fails to reach a 5 percent rate of economic growth by the end of the year.
Leaving aside the issue of which party is in charge and should be taking responsibility; is aiming for 5 percent economic growth too high a target?
Currently, Taiwan’s GDP per capita is less than half that of the US or Japan, and much lower than that of Hong Kong and South Korea. However, demanding a nation, whose economic growth rate is lower than that of other advanced countries, maintain a medium or high rate of economic growth is not an excessive demand. A 5 percent economic growth rate should be the minimum, especially since an economic downturn is often followed by a rebound.
Despite its incompetence in developing the economy, President Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) administration is good at playing the numbers games when dealing with economic policy to fool the public.
It never talks about past negative growth, but highlights the 10.76 percent economic growth rate of 2010 without mentioning that the boom was the result of a rebound following a drop in growth.
This information helped Ma in the presidential election last year and is why the government was not worried when the economic growth rate fell nine times last year: It knows a downturn will be followed by a rebound, and that the worse the downturn, the greater the rebound.
The government is certain to repeat the same trick to once again deceive voters in the local elections next year.
As the base period is so low, it should not be a problem to achieve economic growth rate of 5 percent this year. The government is forecasting a 3.8 percent economic growth rate this year, so when it demands that Su take responsibility if it cannot achieve 5 percent growth, it is trying to trick the public into thinking that this is no easy task.
The government will then repeat the show it put on last year and increase the forecast nine times to convince the public that is doing a good job.
This is something the opposition parties have to be prepared for.
Keeping unemployment below 4 percent should also be easy, because more Taiwanese are working in China.
If Beijing reaches out a helping hand by allowing Taiwanese companies in China to hire more Taiwanese workers, the jobless rate would decline immediately.
Statistically, Taiwanese working in China are categorized as “employed.” This statistical method fails to distinguish between those employed at home and abroad, and has been harshly criticized for years. Still, this is in line with Ma’s goal of eventual unification with China.
What Jiang’s Cabinet really needs to work hardest at is the demand for an average 3 percent salary growth, because this affects the profits of Taiwanese businesspeople both in Taiwan and China.
However, since the average Taiwanese salary has dropped to the level it was at 14 years ago, it should not be very difficult to achieve a 3 percent increase each year.
It is clear that Su’s “3-4-5” demand is a very “friendly” and achievable demand.
Huang Tien-lin is a former presidential adviser.
Translated by Eddy Chang
Saudi Arabian largesse is flooding Egypt’s cultural scene, but the reception is mixed. Some welcome new “cooperation” between two regional powerhouses, while others fear a hostile takeover by Riyadh. In Cairo, historically the cultural capital of the Arab world, Egyptian Minister of Culture Nevine al-Kilany recently hosted Saudi Arabian General Entertainment Authority chairman Turki al-Sheikh. The deep-pocketed al-Sheikh has emerged as a Medici-like patron for Egypt’s cultural elite, courted by Cairo’s top talent to produce a slew of forthcoming films. A new three-way agreement between al-Sheikh, Kilany and United Media Services — a multi-media conglomerate linked to state intelligence that owns much of
The US and other countries should take concrete steps to confront the threats from Beijing to avoid war, US Representative Mario Diaz-Balart said in an interview with Voice of America on March 13. The US should use “every diplomatic economic tool at our disposal to treat China as what it is... to avoid war,” Diaz-Balart said. Giving an example of what the US could do, he said that it has to be more aggressive in its military sales to Taiwan. Actions by cross-party US lawmakers in the past few years such as meeting with Taiwanese officials in Washington and Taipei, and
The Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan has no official diplomatic allies in the EU. With the exception of the Vatican, it has no official allies in Europe at all. This does not prevent the ROC — Taiwan — from having close relations with EU member states and other European countries. The exact nature of the relationship does bear revisiting, if only to clarify what is a very complicated and sensitive idea, the details of which leave considerable room for misunderstanding, misrepresentation and disagreement. Only this week, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) received members of the European Parliament’s Delegation for Relations
Denmark’s “one China” policy more and more resembles Beijing’s “one China” principle. At least, this is how things appear. In recent interactions with the Danish state, such as applying for residency permits, a Taiwanese’s nationality would be listed as “China.” That designation occurs for a Taiwanese student coming to Denmark or a Danish citizen arriving in Denmark with, for example, their Taiwanese partner. Details of this were published on Sunday in an article in the Danish daily Berlingske written by Alexander Sjoberg and Tobias Reinwald. The pretext for this new practice is that Denmark does not recognize Taiwan as a state under