China has adjusted its policy on the Diaoyutai Islands (釣魚台), known as the Senkaku Islands in Japan, since the Japanese government announced its decision to “nationalize” the contested islands last year. Beijing has gone from a passive, indirect approach to a much more active, direct one, and in the process Taiwan has been downgraded from a main actor to a supporting role in the unfolding drama.
Chinese reconnaissance patrols have been traveling within 12 nautical miles (22km) of the islands five or six times a month, and surveillance aircraft have also flown over them.
On two occasions, Chinese Jiangwei-class frigates have directed weapons-related fire-control radar at Japanese vessels, once at a Maritime Self-Defense Force (MSDF) destroyer — the Yuudachi — and once targeting a Japanese military helicopter, giving rise to concerns and protest from Tokyo over what it saw as provocative actions.
China has had to refit a variety of ocean-going vessels, such as ice-breakers or military ships like ocean tugs, survey vessels and electronic reconnaissance ships, as high-tonnage ocean surveillance ships that can patrol the waters around the Diaoyutais just to show that it already has de facto jurisdiction over the area.
This has emboldened Taiwanese fishermen, but the Diaoyutais situation has already made the security issue in the waters to the northeast of Taiwan precarious.
The nation’s coast guard and armed forces have been forced to operate in restricted areas in these waters and are obliged to make regular checks on the position of Chinese vessels and aircraft.
China has been making its sovereignty claims for the Diaoyutais known through a combination of announcements, adverts in international publications and a foreign relations propaganda war, in much the same way as Taiwan and Japan have. It has also submitted to the UN secretary-general maritime maps, territorial sea baselines and base points for the Diaoyutais and affiliated islands along with continental shelf charts extending out 200 nautical miles (370.4km) into sections of the East China Sea to the UN’s Commission on the Limits of the Continental Shelf, pointing out weak points in Taiwan’s sovereignty claims.
At the same time, it has called on the US to remain neutral over the Diaoyutais issue. For example, Chinese Vice President Xi Jinping (習近平) has expressed the wish that the US will exercise restraint and not interfere in the controversy over sovereignty of the islands, or do anything that could incite conflict.
The US is keen for President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) to be mindful of the sensitivity of timing and not to further complicate the US-Japanese response to the Diaoyutais issue through his handling of it.
Indeed, Ma has said that he will not ally with China over the Diaoyutais issue, giving three reasons for this: First, because China does not recognize the 1952 Treaty of Taipei between Japan and the Republic of China (ROC), which the ROC is using to support its sovereignty claim. Second, because China has yet to respond to Ma’s East China Sea peace initiative. Last, because China opposes Taiwan-Japan talks involving the sovereignty issue.
His position has not only left Beijing disappointed, showing this will be detrimental to cross- strait mutual political trust, but it has also thrown cold water over the hopes of individuals and sections of the media in Taiwan wanting a joint China-Taiwan response to protect sovereignty over the islands.
Ma would like to have both sides strive to this end separately, but there is no guarantee that this is how things will turn out.
Lin Cheng-yi is a research fellow at Academia Sinica’s Institute of European and American Studies.
Translated by Paul Cooper
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
The past few months have seen tremendous strides in India’s journey to develop a vibrant semiconductor and electronics ecosystem. The nation’s established prowess in information technology (IT) has earned it much-needed revenue and prestige across the globe. Now, through the convergence of engineering talent, supportive government policies, an expanding market and technologically adaptive entrepreneurship, India is striving to become part of global electronics and semiconductor supply chains. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Vision of “Make in India” and “Design in India” has been the guiding force behind the government’s incentive schemes that span skilling, design, fabrication, assembly, testing and packaging, and
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.