On Jan. 30, President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) held a press conference to announce the government’s new pension reform plan.
Hopefully, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Democratic Progressive Party will be able to negotiate the issue and eventually come up with a satisfactory reform plan.
The biggest flaw with the retirement pension reforms so far has been the creation of a confrontation between military personnel, civil servants and public schoolteachers, and private-sector workers.
Private-sector workers will not receive more as government employees start to receive less, and because private-sector workers’ insurance premiums will gradually increase in the future, the reforms are likely to cause even greater discontent among them.
To ensure fairness for all, the government should make every effort to take good care of private-sector workers.
Businesspeople may protest government plans requiring them to pay more for their employees’ pensions, and the government needs to stand its ground on this issue.
Otherwise, the pension reform plan could end up as a jumbled mess.
The Ma administration’s pension reform plan is based on a gradual approach and the government is set to conduct an overall review every five years.
According to Ma, the main purpose of the plan is to ensure the stability of pensions for the next 30 years.
However a regular review also means that Taiwanese will have to experience the painful process of reform every five years.
As far as Ma’s promise of ensuring stable pensions for the next 30 years, I cannot help but think that pensions will be somewhat less than stable once those 30 years come to an end.
The Ma administration’s pension reform plan is temporary in nature because it is aimed at delaying the bankruptcy of the nation’s pension program for at least the next 30 years.
However, in the face of the near-bankruptcy of the four major retirement funds and the Labor Insurance Fund.
The government is having a harder time appropriating funds to make up for the losses.
A large question mark hangs over whether current pension programs can keep going for another 30 years.
Today, debt across all levels of the government is as high as NT$5.8493 trillion (US$197.5 billion), accounting for 42.7 percent of the nation’s average of GDP over the past three years.
While the figure does not exceed the legal debt ceiling of 48 percent, if the hidden debt of all levels of the government –– which now stands at NT$14.9052 trillion –– is included the total amount of public debt stands in excess of NT$20 trillion, almost placing the government on the edge of a “fiscal cliff.”
The key to whether the nation’s various pension programs can remain stable for 30 years following reform lies in the government’s ability to cope with loss appropriation.
The government should take effective measures to boost economic growth.
It should be more frugal and show determination in pushing forward on tax reforms. It should also slow down the accumulation of national debt and enhance its ability in managing loss appropriation.
Otherwise, the nation’s pension program and finances will be bankrupted within 30 years and the public will suffer greatly as a result.
Yang Chung-hsin is dean of Chinese Culture University’s College of Environmental Design.
Translated by Eddy Chang
The past few months have seen tremendous strides in India’s journey to develop a vibrant semiconductor and electronics ecosystem. The nation’s established prowess in information technology (IT) has earned it much-needed revenue and prestige across the globe. Now, through the convergence of engineering talent, supportive government policies, an expanding market and technologically adaptive entrepreneurship, India is striving to become part of global electronics and semiconductor supply chains. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Vision of “Make in India” and “Design in India” has been the guiding force behind the government’s incentive schemes that span skilling, design, fabrication, assembly, testing and packaging, and
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
As former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) wrapped up his visit to the People’s Republic of China, he received his share of attention. Certainly, the trip must be seen within the full context of Ma’s life, that is, his eight-year presidency, the Sunflower movement and his failed Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement, as well as his eight years as Taipei mayor with its posturing, accusations of money laundering, and ups and downs. Through all that, basic questions stand out: “What drives Ma? What is his end game?” Having observed and commented on Ma for decades, it is all ironically reminiscent of former US president Harry
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.