If presidents campaign in poetry and govern in prose then their second inaugural address is generally delivered in PowerPoint — a less utopian, more businesslike rollout of what they have not yet done. The first time they take the oath is a moment of promise, announced in technicolor. The second is for posterity, offered in sepia. With expectations for the future tempered by experience and lowered by familiarity after re-election, they crane their necks to history.
This time was different. US President Barack Obama’s second inauguration address was far more idealistic, strident, combative and determined than his first — and most others. If his first term was characterized by compromise, in his second he seems determined to do battle. Explicitly championing gay rights, immigration and healthcare reform, and implicitly endorsing tighter gun laws and wealth redistribution, he sought not to articulate the consensus but to fashion a new one.
His decision not to shroud matters of principle and conviction in the rhetoric of unity and bipartisanship marks a difference in tone and strategy. With his search for common ground not bearing fruit, he has shifted to the high ground.
“Our journey is not complete until our gay brothers and sisters are treated like anyone else under the law — for if we are truly created equal, then surely the love we commit to one another must be equal as well. Our journey is not complete until no citizen is forced to wait for hours to exercise the right to vote. Our journey is not complete until we find a better way to welcome the striving, hopeful immigrants who still see America as a land of opportunity. Our journey is not complete until all our children, from the streets of Detroit to the quiet lanes of Newtown, know that they are cared for, and cherished, and always safe from harm,” he said.
For almost every lofty sentiment, there is a caveat, of course. Obama’s record now includes everything from drone attacks to healthcare reform; the bombing of Libya to the withdrawal of troops from Iraq. Those who seek to assert parallels with Martin Luther King Jr, whose birthday was celebrated on Monday, must remember that this is a president with a drones “kill list.”
His position on gay rights evolved just in time for the election and, in his first term, he deported far more people than former US president George W. Bush did in his. However, inauguration speeches — especially second ones — are crafted in paragraphs of intention that omit sub-clauses of justification, let alone calculation. And this was no different.
Circling back to the constitutional refrain “We the people” (a phrase he used five times), it was a call for collective action to enable the country to live up to its founding creed.
“For history tells us that while these truths may be self-evident, they have never been self-executing; that while freedom is a gift from God, it must be secured by his people here on Earth ... We have always understood that when times change, so must we; that fidelity to our founding principles requires new responses to new challenges; that preserving our individual freedoms ultimately requires collective action,” he said.
As such, there were two audiences for this speech. The first was the US public. If Monday’s ceremony, with its celebrations of the trappings of democracy, marked a ritual veneration of the office of the presidency, the past four years have shown the limitations of the office. Four years that have seen the country teeter close to a fiscal cliff and almost bash its head on a debt ceiling, illustrate Obama’s naivety in believing he could simply rise above partisan divide as though it were beneath him.
The speech was an appeal to civic engagement that might goad the political class out of its dysfunction.
“For we, the people, understand that our country cannot succeed when a shrinking few do very well and a growing many barely make it ... We, the people, still believe that every citizen deserves a basic measure of security and dignity ... We, the people, still believe that enduring security and lasting peace do not require perpetual war,” he said.
On most key issues — wealth distribution, gun control, gay marriage — the public, “we the people,” is more inclined to Obama’s positions than those held by the US Congress, but have yet to feel sufficiently energized to fight for those views the way their opponents do. With his election victory behind him, Obama now understands that any legacy beyond being the first black president will hinge on his ability to bring pressure to bear on Congress from the outside.
So the second audience was Congress in general and Republicans in particular. There were scathing lines for them.
“We cannot mistake absolutism for principle, or substitute spectacle for politics, or treat name-calling as reasoned debate,” he said.
The crowds in Washington of course were smaller than last time and, even though it was Martin Luther King Day, the historic nature of the event was more low key. Nonetheless, the energy in the crowd still, at times, came off more like a campaign rally than a state event. The romance may have gone. However, the love is still there.
Could Asia be on the verge of a new wave of nuclear proliferation? A look back at the early history of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), which recently celebrated its 75th anniversary, illuminates some reasons for concern in the Indo-Pacific today. US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin recently described NATO as “the most powerful and successful alliance in history,” but the organization’s early years were not without challenges. At its inception, the signing of the North Atlantic Treaty marked a sea change in American strategic thinking. The United States had been intent on withdrawing from Europe in the years following
My wife and I spent the week in the interior of Taiwan where Shuyuan spent her childhood. In that town there is a street that functions as an open farmer’s market. Walk along that street, as Shuyuan did yesterday, and it is next to impossible to come home empty-handed. Some mangoes that looked vaguely like others we had seen around here ended up on our table. Shuyuan told how she had bought them from a little old farmer woman from the countryside who said the mangoes were from a very old tree she had on her property. The big surprise
The issue of China’s overcapacity has drawn greater global attention recently, with US Secretary of the Treasury Janet Yellen urging Beijing to address its excess production in key industries during her visit to China last week. Meanwhile in Brussels, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen last week said that Europe must have a tough talk with China on its perceived overcapacity and unfair trade practices. The remarks by Yellen and Von der Leyen come as China’s economy is undergoing a painful transition. Beijing is trying to steer the world’s second-largest economy out of a COVID-19 slump, the property crisis and
As former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) wrapped up his visit to the People’s Republic of China, he received his share of attention. Certainly, the trip must be seen within the full context of Ma’s life, that is, his eight-year presidency, the Sunflower movement and his failed Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement, as well as his eight years as Taipei mayor with its posturing, accusations of money laundering, and ups and downs. Through all that, basic questions stand out: “What drives Ma? What is his end game?” Having observed and commented on Ma for decades, it is all ironically reminiscent of former US president Harry