The Democratic Progressive Party’s (DPP) Jan. 13 demonstration was followed by another protest march by labor groups on Saturday. While the DPP’s political motive was to launch a bid to recall President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九), workers are struggling against unfavorable political and business conditions.
What worries workers the most is the practice of unpaid leave, what hurts them most is the planned reduction in labor retirement pensions, what confuses them most is that part-timers — but not full-timers — have to pay a 2 percent supplementary premium under the Second Generation National Health Insurance program, and what irritates them most is that each Taiwanese is saddled with an average national debt of NT$220,000 (US$7,570).
The social unrest will not be relieved by the DPP’s call for a change of government, because a change in government will not bring a change in thinking.
Let us use a recent controversial issue as an example: The government has fiscal problems, and Taiwan’s national debt is almost as high as Greece’s. The government and the opposition have argued about canceling year-end bonuses and the 18 percent preferential interest rate for retired military personnel, civil servants and public school teachers, but their focus is on whether these measures should be written into law, whether such a law should be retroactive and whether key officials should resign to take responsibility.
In the end, they cut the bonuses of retired government employees and state-owned enterprise workers to make it seem as if they were determined to push for reform, but the measures fell short of public expectations.
Of all the public complaints, the greatest is about high housing prices. Workers earning NT$30,000 a month will only be able to purchase an apartment in Taipei if they work for 28 years without eating and drinking.
Meanwhile, an insurance company that obtained a large tract of public land in downtown Taipei several years ago made a profit of several billions of New Taiwan dollars by selling it to a construction company.
Without a capital gains tax and a property tax that is based on market value, the government could do nothing to stop speculators from driving up housing prices.
The income gap between the rich and poor is fueling social conflict. The government’s social insurance programs and mutual help organizations for the disadvantaged are unable to provide a sustainable social security net for the needy. The result is that salaried workers and government employees blame each other for having to pay more to fund the pension system, while getting smaller payments in return and having to retire later.
As government revenues decreased and it continued issuing new debts to service existing debts, total hidden government debt might be as high as NT$20 trillion. This debt translates into each Taiwanese owing NT$900,000 — almost NT$700,000 higher than the official debt per capita.
The wages of 90 percent of employees at small and medium-sized enterprises have regressed to the level of 14 years ago. Meanwhile, government lobbying remains rampant, and corrupt officials and their families continue to make illegal profits. The government’s reorganization efforts have also proven to be a big disappointment.
Lastly is the Second Generation National Health Insurance program, which took effect on Jan. 1. Despite a NT$10 million cap on taxable supplementary income, enterprising individuals have thought of various tactics to avoid the tax. It has been less than a month since the program was implemented, but Minister of Health Chiu Wen-ta (邱文達) has already proposed new amendments to push for a “third-generation national health insurance” program by 2016 to close the loopholes.
Taiwan’s 2 percent supplementary premium specifically targets the poor.
Seeing how the ruling and opposition parties restrain themselves on the legislative floor when it comes to the interests of the rich, one cannot help but wonder how the public could ever hope for reform.
Lai Hsiang-ling is the spokeswoman of Raging Citizens Act Now!
Translated by Eddy Chang
China has long sought shortcuts to developing semiconductor technologies and local supply chains by poaching engineers and experts from Taiwan and other nations. It is also suspected of stealing trade secrets from Taiwanese and US firms to fulfill its ambition of becoming a major player in the global semiconductor industry in the next decade. However, it takes more than just money and talent to build a semiconductor supply chain like the one which Taiwan and the US started to cultivate more than 30 years ago. Amid rising trade and technology tensions between the world’s two biggest economies, Beijing has become
With a new White House document in May — the “Strategic Approach to the People’s Republic of China” — the administration of US President Donald Trump has firmly set its hyper-competitive line to tackle geoeconomic and geostrategic rivalry, followed by several reinforcing speeches by Trump and other Cabinet-level officials. By identifying China as a near-equal rival, the strategy resonates well with the bipartisan consensus on China in today’s severely divided US. In the face of China’s rapidly growing aggression, the move is long overdue, yet relevant for the maintenance of the international “status quo.” The strategy seems to herald a new
To say that this year has been eventful for China and the rest of the world would be something of an understatement. First, the US-China trade dispute, already simmering for two years, reached a boiling point as Washington tightened the noose around China’s economy. Second, China unleashed the COVID-19 pandemic on the world, wreaking havoc on an unimaginable scale and turning the People’s Republic of China into a common target of international scorn. Faced with a mounting crisis at home, Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) rashly decided to ratchet up military tensions with neighboring countries in a misguided attempt to divert the
Toward the end of former president Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) final term in office, there was much talk about his legacy. Ma himself would likely prefer history books to enshrine his achievements in reducing cross-strait tensions. He might see his meeting with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) in Singapore in 2015 as the high point. However, given his statements in the past few months, he might be remembered more for contributing to the breakup of the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT). We are still talking about Ma and his legacy because it is inextricably tied to the so-called “1992 consensus” as the bedrock of his